OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the antitumor activity of everolimus and bevacizumab among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors and to assess perfusion computed tomography (CT) as a potential functional biomarker. METHODS:Patients with low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors received one 3-week cycle of 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab on day 1 or 10 mg of everolimus daily. Subsequent cycles consisted of the combination of both drugs. Perfusion CTs were performed at baseline and at the end of cycles 1 and 3. RESULTS: Therapy decreased blood flow (BF) proportional to baseline measurements. Bevacizumab was associated with a 44% decrease in BF (P < 0.0001). After the addition of everolimus, a further 29% decrease (P = 0.02) in BF was observed. Everolimus alone was associated with 13% increase in mean transit time (P = 0.02). Clinical activity was demonstrated, with a confirmed response rate of 21% and a median progression-free survival of 14.6 (95% confidence interval, 13.0-16.1) months. Pretreatment tumor permeability surface (P = 0.009), posttreatment mean transit time (P = 0.003), percent reduction in BF (P = 0.03), and percent reduction in blood volume (P = 0.002) were associated with best percent reduction in tumor diameters. CONCLUSIONS:Bevacizumab and everolimus demonstrated antitumor activity. Perfusion CT is a promising tool for the development of antiangiogenic strategies and for the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from therapy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the antitumor activity of everolimus and bevacizumab among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors and to assess perfusion computed tomography (CT) as a potential functional biomarker. METHODS:Patients with low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors received one 3-week cycle of 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab on day 1 or 10 mg of everolimus daily. Subsequent cycles consisted of the combination of both drugs. Perfusion CTs were performed at baseline and at the end of cycles 1 and 3. RESULTS: Therapy decreased blood flow (BF) proportional to baseline measurements. Bevacizumab was associated with a 44% decrease in BF (P < 0.0001). After the addition of everolimus, a further 29% decrease (P = 0.02) in BF was observed. Everolimus alone was associated with 13% increase in mean transit time (P = 0.02). Clinical activity was demonstrated, with a confirmed response rate of 21% and a median progression-free survival of 14.6 (95% confidence interval, 13.0-16.1) months. Pretreatment tumor permeability surface (P = 0.009), posttreatment mean transit time (P = 0.003), percent reduction in BF (P = 0.03), and percent reduction in blood volume (P = 0.002) were associated with best percent reduction in tumor diameters. CONCLUSIONS:Bevacizumab and everolimus demonstrated antitumor activity. Perfusion CT is a promising tool for the development of antiangiogenic strategies and for the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from therapy.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Heidi A Lane; Jeanette M Wood; Paul M J McSheehy; Peter R Allegrini; Anne Boulay; Joseph Brueggen; Amanda Littlewood-Evans; Sauveur-Michel Maira; Georg Martiny-Baron; Christian R Schnell; Patrizia Sini; Terence O'Reilly Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Neal J Meropol; James Posey; David P Ryan; Joel Picus; Emily Bergsland; Keith Stuart; Lesley Tye; Xin Huang; Jim Z Li; Charles M Baum; Charles S Fuchs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joseph Baar; Paula Silverman; Janice Lyons; Pingfu Fu; Fadi Abdul-Karim; Nicholas Ziats; Jay Wasman; Paul Hartman; John Jesberger; Leda Dumadag; Erin Hohler; Rosemary Leeming; Robert Shenk; Helen Chen; Keith McCrae; Afshin Dowlati; Scot C Remick; Beth Overmoyer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jun Zhang; Zhiliang Jia; Qiang Li; Liwei Wang; Asif Rashid; Zhenggang Zhu; Douglas B Evans; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Keping Xie; James C Yao Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Vasiliki Mavroeidi; Eleftherios Chatzellis; Gregory A Kaltsas; Krystallenia I Alexandraki Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2018-06