Literature DB >> 19223496

mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) has antiangiogenic/vascular properties distinct from a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Heidi A Lane1, Jeanette M Wood, Paul M J McSheehy, Peter R Allegrini, Anne Boulay, Joseph Brueggen, Amanda Littlewood-Evans, Sauveur-Michel Maira, Georg Martiny-Baron, Christian R Schnell, Patrizia Sini, Terence O'Reilly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comparison of the antiangiogenic/vascular properties of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor vatalanib (PTK/ZK). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Antiproliferative activity against various tumor histotypes and downstream effects on the mTOR pathway were measured in vitro. In vivo, antitumor activity, plasma, and tumor RAD001 levels were measured. Activity in several different angiogenic/vascular assays in vitro and in vivo was assessed and compared with PTK/ZK.
RESULTS: RAD001 inhibited proliferation in vitro (IC50 values<1 nmol/L to >1 micromol/L), and in sensitive and insensitive tumor cells, pS6 kinase and 4E-BP1 were inhibited. Activity in vitro did not correlate with activity in vivo and significant responses were seen in tumors with IC50 values>10-fold higher than tumor RAD001 concentrations. In vitro, RAD001 inhibited the proliferation of VEGF-stimulated and fibroblast growth factor-stimulated human endothelial cells but not dermal fibroblasts and impaired VEGF release from both sensitive and insensitive tumor cells but did not inhibit migration of human endothelial cells. In vivo, in tumor models derived from either sensitive or insensitive cells, RAD001 reduced Tie-2 levels, the amount of mature and immature vessels, total plasma, and tumor VEGF. RAD001 did not affect blood vessel leakiness in normal vasculature acutely exposed to VEGF nor did it affect tumor vascular permeability (Ktrans) as measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. However, the pan-VEGFR inhibitor PTK/ZK inhibited endothelial cell migration and vascular permeability but had less effect on mature vessels compared with RAD001.
CONCLUSIONS: VEGFR and mTOR inhibitors show similar but also distinct effects on tumor vascular biology, which has implications for their clinical activity alone or in combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19223496     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  86 in total

1.  A phase Ib study of combined VEGFR and mTOR inhibition with vatalanib and everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Rhonda L Bitting; Patrick Healy; Patricia A Creel; James Turnbull; Karla Morris; Sarah Yenser Wood; Herbert I Hurwitz; Mark D Starr; Andrew B Nixon; Andrew J Armstrong; Daniel J George
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Everolimus.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Vascular hyperpermeability as a hallmark of phacomatoses: is the etiology angiogenesis comparable with mechanisms seen in inflammatory pathways? Part I: historical observations and clinical perspectives on the etiology of increased CSF protein levels, CSF clotting, and communicating hydrocephalus: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Yosef Laviv; Burkhard S Kasper; Ekkehard M Kasper
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Intrinsic resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is associated with poor clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Christoph Seidel; Steffen Weikert; Ingmar Wolff; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Lisa Weinkauf; Stefan Hinz; Ahmed Magheli; Kurt Miller; Viktor Grünwald
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Everolimus.

Authors:  Michael B Atkins; Uma Yasothan; Peter Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Everolimus inhibits anti-HLA I antibody-mediated endothelial cell signaling, migration and proliferation more potently than sirolimus.

Authors:  Y-P Jin; N M Valenzuela; M E Ziegler; E Rozengurt; E F Reed
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Specific apoptosis induction by the dual PI3K/mTor inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in HER2 amplified and PIK3CA mutant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Saskia M Brachmann; Irmgard Hofmann; Christian Schnell; Christine Fritsch; Susan Wee; Heidi Lane; Shaowen Wang; Carlos Garcia-Echeverria; Sauveur-Michel Maira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Synergistic interactions between sorafenib and everolimus in pancreatic cancer xenografts in mice.

Authors:  Dipti K Pawaskar; Robert M Straubinger; Gerald J Fetterly; Bonnie H Hylander; Elizabeth A Repasky; Wen W Ma; William J Jusko
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Stage 2 combination testing of rapamycin with cytotoxic agents by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Richard Gorlick; Richard B Lock; Hernan Carol; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Stephen T Keir; E Anders Kolb; Jianrong Wu; Amy W Wozniak; Catherine A Billups; Larry Rubinstein; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  Everolimus in combination with exemestane: a review of its use in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.