Literature DB >> 25425306

Developing an instrumental activities of daily living tool as part of the low vision assessment of daily activities protocol.

Robert P Finger1, Shane C McSweeney1, Lil Deverell1, Fleur O'Hare1, Sharon A Bentley2, Chi D Luu1, Robyn H Guymer1, Lauren N Ayton1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the validity, reliability, and measurement characteristics using factor and Rasch analysis of the Very Low Vision Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL-VLV) in persons with severe vision loss.
METHODS: From an initial pool of 296 tasks, 25 were shortlisted after conducting a Delphi survey with persons designated legally blind. Using further input from occupational therapy and low-vision professionals, 11 activities were chosen to be pilot tested. Forty legally blind participants (better eye visual acuity < 20/200) underwent clinical assessments and functional tests as well as the 53 IADL tasks related to the 11 activities. The task pool was refined and condensed using factor and Rasch analysis.
RESULTS: Based on iterative principal component analyses, tasks were grouped together into the following domains: reading signs/information access, signature placement, clothes sorting, shelf search, gesture recognition, clock reading, and table search. A final selection of 23 tasks yielded satisfactory measurement characteristics, differentiated between at least four different levels of IADL performance (person separation of 3.8), and had adequate task difficulty for the tested sample (person mean -0.61). In multivariate analyses, only visual acuity (VA) and percent of remaining visual field (VF) were associated with IADL performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a large item pool, participant, and expert input, as well as factor and Rasch analysis, we designed a valid and reliable assessment to measure vision-related IADL performance in persons with severe vision loss. This assessment tool can be used in clinical sight restoration trials. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activities of Daily Living; instrument development; psychometric measurement; retinitis pigmentosa; visual impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25425306     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-14732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 2.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Calibrating the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI): Creation of a Sample-Independent Visual Function Measure for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

Authors:  Judith E Goldstein; Eva Fenwick; Robert P Finger; Vijaya Gothwal; Mary Lou Jackson; Ecosse Lamoureux; Gwyneth Rees; Robert Massof
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Development of the Vision Impairment in Low Luminance Questionnaire.

Authors:  Susanne G Pondorfer; Jan H Terheyden; Helen Overhoff; Jana Stasch-Bouws; Frank G Holz; Robert P Finger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results.

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Samuel A Titchener; Maria Kolic; William G Kentler; Carla J Abbott; David A X Nayagam; Elizabeth K Baglin; Jessica Kvansakul; Nick Barnes; Janine G Walker; Stephanie B Epp; Kiera A Young; Lauren N Ayton; Chi D Luu; Penelope J Allen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Web-Based Versus Print-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Crossover Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Claudia R Pischke; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Tiara Ratz; Manuela Peters; Christoph Buck; Jochen Meyer; Kai von Holdt; Sonia Lippke
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.947

7.  Distinct physical activity and sedentary behavior trajectories in older adults during participation in a physical activity intervention: a latent class growth analysis.

Authors:  Tiara Ratz; Claudia R Pischke; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Sonia Lippke
Journal:  Eur Rev Aging Phys Act       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.878

Review 8.  Revisiting Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Claire Meyniel; Bahram Bodaghi; Pierre-Yves Robert
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-01

9.  Assessment of the Electronic Retinal Implant Alpha AMS in Restoring Vision to Blind Patients with End-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Authors:  Thomas L Edwards; Charles L Cottriall; Kanmin Xue; Matthew P Simunovic; James D Ramsden; Eberhart Zrenner; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Assessing Photoreceptor Status in Retinal Dystrophies: From High-Resolution Imaging to Functional Vision.

Authors:  José-Alain Sahel; Kate Grieve; Chloé Pagot; Colas Authié; Saddek Mohand-Said; Michel Paques; Isabelle Audo; Karine Becker; Anne-Elisabeth Chaumet-Riffaud; Line Azoulay; Emmanuel Gutman; Thierry Léveillard; Christina Zeitz; Serge Picaud; Deniz Dalkara; Katia Marazova
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.