D Tidemalm1, K Beckman1, M Dahlin1, M Vaez2, P Lichtenstein3, N Långström3, B Runeson1. 1. Department of Clinical Neuroscience,Centre for Psychiatry Research,Karolinska Institutet,Stockholm,Sweden. 2. Division of Insurance Medicine,Department of Clinical Neuroscience,Karolinska Institutet,Stockholm,Sweden. 3. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Karolinska Institutet,Stockholm,Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Possible age-related differences in risk of completed suicide following non-fatal self-harm remain unexplored. We examined associations between self-harm and completed suicide across age groups of self-harming patients, and whether these associations varied by violent index method, presence of mental disorder, and repeated self-harm. METHOD: The design was a cohort study with linked national registers in Sweden. The study population comprised individuals aged ⩾10 years hospitalized during 1990-1999 due to non-fatal self-harm (n = 53 843; 58% females) who were followed for 9-19 years. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) across age groups (age at index self-harm episode), with time to completed suicide as outcome. RESULTS: The 1-year HR for suicide among younger males (10-19 years) was 14.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1-51.9] for violent method and 8.4 (95% CI 1.8-40.0) for mental disorder. By contrast, none of the three potential risk factors increased the 1-year risks in the youngest females. Among patients aged ⩾20 years, the 1-year HR for violent method was 4.6 (95% CI 3.8-5.4) for males and 10.4 (95% CI 8.3-13.0) for females. HRs for repeated self-harm during years 2-9 of follow-up were higher in 10- to 19-year-olds (males: HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.0-7.8; females: HR 3.7, 95% CI 2.1-6.5). The ⩾20 years age groups had higher HRs than the youngest, particularly for females and especially within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Violent method and mental disorder increase the 1-year suicide risk in young male self-harm patients. Further, violent method increases suicide risk within 1 year in all age and gender groups except the youngest females. Repeated self-harm may increase the long-term risk more in young patients. These aspects should be accounted for in clinical suicide risk assessment.
BACKGROUND: Possible age-related differences in risk of completed suicide following non-fatal self-harm remain unexplored. We examined associations between self-harm and completed suicide across age groups of self-harming patients, and whether these associations varied by violent index method, presence of mental disorder, and repeated self-harm. METHOD: The design was a cohort study with linked national registers in Sweden. The study population comprised individuals aged ⩾10 years hospitalized during 1990-1999 due to non-fatal self-harm (n = 53 843; 58% females) who were followed for 9-19 years. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) across age groups (age at index self-harm episode), with time to completed suicide as outcome. RESULTS: The 1-year HR for suicide among younger males (10-19 years) was 14.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1-51.9] for violent method and 8.4 (95% CI 1.8-40.0) for mental disorder. By contrast, none of the three potential risk factors increased the 1-year risks in the youngest females. Among patients aged ⩾20 years, the 1-year HR for violent method was 4.6 (95% CI 3.8-5.4) for males and 10.4 (95% CI 8.3-13.0) for females. HRs for repeated self-harm during years 2-9 of follow-up were higher in 10- to 19-year-olds (males: HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.0-7.8; females: HR 3.7, 95% CI 2.1-6.5). The ⩾20 years age groups had higher HRs than the youngest, particularly for females and especially within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Violent method and mental disorder increase the 1-year suicide risk in young male self-harm patients. Further, violent method increases suicide risk within 1 year in all age and gender groups except the youngest females. Repeated self-harm may increase the long-term risk more in young patients. These aspects should be accounted for in clinical suicide risk assessment.
Authors: Matthew J Carr; Darren M Ashcroft; Evangelos Kontopantelis; David While; Yvonne Awenat; Jayne Cooper; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Nav Kapur; Roger T Webb Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Hanna Sahlin; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Johan Bjureberg; Paul Lichtenstein; Yasmina Molero; Mina Rydell; Erik Hedman; Bo Runeson; Jussi Jokinen; Brjánn Ljótsson; Clara Hellner Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Mark Olfson; Carlos Blanco; Melanie Wall; Shang-Min Liu; Tulshi D Saha; Roger P Pickering; Bridget F Grant Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Henrik Ohlsson; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Deepak Prabhakar; Edward L Peterson; Yong Hu; Simran Chawa; Rebecca C Rossom; Frances L Lynch; Christine Y Lu; Beth E Waitzfelder; Ashli A Owen-Smith; L Keoki Williams; Arne Beck; Gregory E Simon; Brian K Ahmedani Journal: Crisis Date: 2020-11-05