E Quagliotto1, K R Casali2, P Dal Lago3, A A Rasia-Filho1. 1. Departamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde/Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. 2. Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil. 3. Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Abstract
The rat posterodorsal medial amygdala (MePD) links emotionally charged sensory stimuli to social behavior, and is part of the supramedullary control of the cardiovascular system. We studied the effects of microinjections of neuroactive peptides markedly found in the MePD, namely oxytocin (OT, 10 ng and 25 pg; n=6/group), somatostatin (SST, 1 and 0.05 μM; n=8 and 5, respectively), and angiotensin II (Ang II, 50 pmol and 50 fmol; n=7/group), on basal cardiovascular activity and on baroreflex- and chemoreflex-mediated responses in awake adult male rats. Power spectral and symbolic analyses were applied to pulse interval and systolic arterial pressure series to identify centrally mediated sympathetic/parasympathetic components in the heart rate variability (HRV) and arterial pressure variability (APV). No microinjected substance affected basal parameters. On the other hand, compared with the control data (saline, 0.3 µL; n=7), OT (10 ng) decreased mean AP (MAP50) after baroreflex stimulation and increased both the mean AP response after chemoreflex activation and the high-frequency component of the HRV. OT (25 pg) increased overall HRV but did not affect any parameter of the symbolic analysis. SST (1 μM) decreased MAP50, and SST (0.05 μM) enhanced the sympathovagal cardiac index. Both doses of SST increased HRV and its low-frequency component. Ang II (50 pmol) increased HRV and reduced the two unlike variations pattern of the symbolic analysis (P<0.05 in all cases). These results demonstrate neuropeptidergic actions in the MePD for both the increase in the range of the cardiovascular reflex responses and the involvement of the central sympathetic and parasympathetic systems on HRV and APV.
The rat posterodorsal medial amygdala (MePD) links emotionally charged sensory stimuli to social behavior, and is part of the supramedullary control of the cardiovascular system. We studied the effects of microinjections of neuroactive peptides markedly found in the MePD, namely oxytocin (OT, 10 ng and 25 pg; n=6/group), somatostatin (SST, 1 and 0.05 μM; n=8 and 5, respectively), and angiotensin II (Ang II, 50 pmol and 50 fmol; n=7/group), on basal cardiovascular activity and on baroreflex- and chemoreflex-mediated responses in awake adult male rats. Power spectral and symbolic analyses were applied to pulse interval and systolic arterial pressure series to identify centrally mediated sympathetic/parasympathetic components in the heart rate variability (HRV) and arterial pressure variability (APV). No microinjected substance affected basal parameters. On the other hand, compared with the control data (saline, 0.3 µL; n=7), OT (10 ng) decreased mean AP (MAP50) after baroreflex stimulation and increased both the mean AP response after chemoreflex activation and the high-frequency component of the HRV. OT (25 pg) increased overall HRV but did not affect any parameter of the symbolic analysis. SST (1 μM) decreased MAP50, and SST (0.05 μM) enhanced the sympathovagal cardiac index. Both doses of SST increased HRV and its low-frequency component. Ang II (50 pmol) increased HRV and reduced the two unlike variations pattern of the symbolic analysis (P<0.05 in all cases). These results demonstrate neuropeptidergic actions in the MePD for both the increase in the range of the cardiovascular reflex responses and the involvement of the central sympathetic and parasympathetic systems on HRV and APV.
The posterodorsal medial amygdala (MePD) is a forebrain subcortical component of the
“extended amygdala” (1) with a well-described
role in the response to stressful stimuli (2),
hypothalamic neuroendocrine secretion (3), and
the display of social behaviors, such as aggressive and reproductive behaviors in rats
(4,5).
The MePD is important for higher-level, supramedullary control of cardiovascular
functions (6-8), and, in this sense, sends projections to the central amygdaloid nucleus
(CeA) and then to the A1 noradrenergic cells of the caudal ventrolateral medulla and the
nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS 9,10). The MePD is also interconnected with other
medial amygdala subnuclei that innervate cardiovascular-related areas of the
hypothalamus (9,10) and the sympathetic/parasympathetic-related parts of the periventricular
hypothalamic zone (11). It is highly likely that
this integrated network modulates cardiovascular responses to ensure appropriate
hemodynamic responses concomitant with the expression of social behaviors (7,8,12).The involvement of the MePD in the regulation of heart rate (HR) and arterial blood
pressure (AP) were reported under different methodological conditions. For example,
electrical stimulation of the MePD increased AP in mice (13). Activation of the whole mouse medial amygdala (MeA) after fear or
aversive stress led to sympathetic activation and neurogenic hypertension (14,15),
whereas bilateral neurotoxic lesions of the posterior part of the MeA attenuated the
development of high AP levels in spontaneously hypertensiverats (16). Moreover, central control of short-term reflexes of the
cardiovascular system integrates inputs from peripheral baroreceptors and chemoreceptors
and the sympathetic/parasympathetic output to the heart and vascular beds (17). Microinjection of glutamate (2 μg/0.3 µL) into
the MePD of awake rats elicits a selective activation of the central sympathetic
adjustment to modulate the baroreflex response, whereas microinjection of
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA; 61 ng/0.3 µL) activates the central parasympathetic
counterpart (8). Histamine (30 μg/0.3 µL and 300
μg/0.3 µL) in the MePD shows more complex and dose-dependent responses, with a lower
dose modulating part of the baroreflex response and a higher dose leading to a decrease
in the parasympathetic component of the HR variability (HRV), an increase in the
sympathetic/parasympathetic balance at basal conditions, and impairment of the
chemoreflex bradycardic response (7).It is notable that various neuroactive peptides can be found in the MePD. Oxytocin
(OT)-binding sites occur in different MePD cellular columns (18), and local OT modulates the neural processing of social odorants
and approach behavior (19). Somatostatin (SST) is
found in the MePD as well (20,21) and causes a dose-dependent inhibition of the
rat MeA, either directly or by activating GABAergic synaptic transmission (21). There is also an evident expression of the
angiotensin II (Ang II) 1A receptor in the MePD (22). These findings are worth noting because OT reduces cardiovascular
responses to acute stress in rats (23) and
modulates baroreceptor reflex responses (24). SST
modulates sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular actions and induces hypotension
and bradycardia (25). Ang II can increase AP due
to centrally mediated effects (26), acting in
circumventricular organs or in the NTS, either by activating the central sympathetic
nervous system or by elevating plasma vasopressin, noradrenaline, and adrenaline levels
(6,27).
In rats, central Ang II also blunts parasympathetic activity, reduces baroreflex
sensitivity (28), and stimulates chemoreflex
responses (29). However, it is not currently
known whether there are cardiovascular effects induced by these neuropeptides when
acting in the ratMePD.Here, we studied the basal hemodynamic state and reflex-mediated cardiovascular
responses after microinjections of OT, SST, and Ang II into the MePD of awake male rats.
Baroreflex and chemoreflex responses were tested. Power spectral and symbolic analyses
were performed to evaluate the central involvement of sympathetic and parasympathetic
components in the variability of the HR and AP. We used the same methodological approach
previously described for the study of classical neurotransmitter actions in the MePD
(7,8, and
references therein) and found additional changes in the central control of
cardiovascular reflexes elicited by these neuropeptides in this brain area, providing
additional detail for better understanding of the mechanisms already described in the
literature (6).
Material and Methods
Animals
Adult male Wistar rats (3-4 months old, body weight 250-300 g) were kept in groups
under standard laboratory conditions, with food and water ad libitum
and room temperature around 22°C in a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights off at 7:00
pm). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals and their suffering.
Rats were manipulated according to international laws for ethical care and use
(European Communities Council Directive of 24 November 1986, 86/609/EEC), conforming
to national guidelines, and experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (protocol #05/029).
Implantation of the MePD cannula and vascular catheters for hemodynamic
evaluation
The experimental design is shown in Figure 1.
Animals were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine and xylazine (90 and 10
mg/kg, ip, respectively) and were stereotaxically implanted with a
cannula (0.6 mm outer diameter, OD) 2 mm above the right MePD, according to the
following coordinates: 3.3 mm posterior to the bregma, 3.6 mm lateral to the sagittal
suture, and 5.7 mm below the dura mater (adapted from Ref. 30; Figure 2). After that, each rat received ketoprofen (3 mg/kg in
0.3 mL, ip), one injection per day for 2 days.
Figure 1
Experimental design (in days) with surgical, microinjection, cardiovascular
recordings and histological procedure schedules.
Figure 2
A, Photomicrograph of a coronal section of the ventral
forebrain to show the microinjection (MI) site where substances were
microinjected, diffused out and reached the posterodorsal medial amygdala
(MePD), without lesioning it directly. In this case, the MePD was found
approximately 3.30 mm below the bregma, lateral to the optic tract (opt) and
ventral to the stria terminalis (st). Hematoxylin and eosin stain.
B, Schematic drawing of coronal sections of the ventral
part of the rat brain showing the MePD and the approximate sites for the
microinjections of saline, oxytocin, somatostatin and angiotensin II (filled
circles). Non-target sites are indicated by filled squares. All microinjections
were administered to the right MePD and the points represent the approximate
locale for drug spread. There are fewer points than the number of animals
studied due to overlapping in the microinjection sites in different rats. No
evident signs of parenchymal lesions in the MePD were found in the experimental
groups. Coordinates are in millimeters posterior to the bregma (from 2.8 to 3.8
mm). MePV, posteroventral part of the medial amygdaloid nucleus. Adapted from
Ref. 30.
After 5 days, animals were anesthetized as cited earlier and had a polyethylene
catheter [PE-10 soldered to a PE-50, 0.28 mm inner diameter (ID), Biocorp, Australia,
filled with sterile 0.9% NaCl (pH 7.4) and heparin] placed into the abdominal aorta
and another into the inferior vena cava through the left femoral artery and vein,
respectively. Each catheter was tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized at the back
of the rat neck. Gentamicin (2 mg/rat, im) was injected at the end
of this procedure. The next day, the arterial catheter was attached to a 40-cm
polyethylene tube (PE-50, 0.5 mm ID, Biocorp), and a strain-gauge pressure transducer
(P23 Db, Gould Statham, USA) was used for direct hemodynamic measurements. Signals
passed through a preamplifier (Hewlett-Packard 8805, Puerto Rico) and were delivered
to a microcomputer equipped with an analog-to-digital converter board (CODAS, 1 kHz,
Dataq Instruments, USA). The recorded data were analyzed on a beat-to-beat basis.All rats of the control and experimental groups were subjected to the same recording
protocol. That is, after the catheter was connected to the transducer, rats were
allowed to acclimate to a Plexiglas recording box (25×15×10 cm) over 20 to 30 min
while cardiovascular parameters were being continuously monitored. Values of HR and
AP were obtained during the last 15 min of this period to provide basal within group
and between groups data to be compared with the effects of microinjections into the
MePD. All recordings occurred during the morning (from 8:00 am to 12:00 noon) to
avoid unpredictable circadian variations in the results.Immediately after these initial recordings, a microinjection needle (0.3 mm OD) was
introduced into and 2 mm below the intracerebral guide cannula. Animals were then
randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental groups that were manually microinjected with
1) vehicle (saline, 0.3 µL, n=7) as the control group;
2) OT (10 ng/0.3 µL and 25 pg/0.3 µL, n=6 in both groups);
3) SST (1 μM/0.3 µL, n=8; and 0.05 μM/0.3 µL, n=5);
4) Ang II (50 pmol/0.3 µL and 50 fmol/0.3 µL, n=7 in both
groups). All drugs were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (USA). These higher and
lower values of OT, SST, and Ang II proved to be effective in inducing central
effects when microinjected into different brain areas (described in Ref. 6 and
references therein). The microinjection procedure was monitored by the displacement
of liquid and an air bubble inside the catheter connected to a 2-µL Hamilton
microsyringe (USA), lasted for 1 min, and the needle remained inside the cannula for
an additional minute to avoid reflux. After 4 min, new cardiovascular recordings were
obtained and lasted for the next 15 min. Additional MePD microinjections were
completed before testing baroreceptor- and chemoreceptor-mediated reflexes. Then,
every rat received 3 microinjections of each substance assigned to its experimental
group as follows: one to test the MePD microinjection effects on the HR and AP
values, one before testing the baroreflex responses, and one before testing the
chemoreflex responses. The order for testing baroreflex or chemoreflex activities was
randomly chosen for each rat in all experimental groups. Obvious drug carryover
effects were avoided, and new recordings were only started when hemodynamic values
returned to baseline levels and remained stable during the recording time (7,8).
Baroreflex and chemoreflex stimulation
Reflex responses were tested 5 min following each MePD microinjection.
Baroreflex-mediated changes were measured during peak increases or decreases in mean
arterial pressure (MAP) after vena cava injection of a single dose of phenylephrine
(8 µg/0.1 mL, Sigma Chemical Co.), or sodium nitroprusside (100 µg/0.1 mL, Sigma
Chemical Co.) dissolved in saline (8). These
injections were made manually and, in all experimental groups, at similar and
appropriate infusion rates, to lead to changes in MAP in the range 10-30 mmHg with no
evident artifactual activations. Various data points served to compose sigmoidal
curves. All changes in MAP and HR were measured, and baroreflex sensitivity was
determined by fitting the MAP and HR changes to a sigmoidal logistic equation, as
follows: HR=P1+P2/[1+exp P3×(MAP−P4)]
where P1 is the lower HR plateau [in beats per minute (bpm)],
P2 is HR range between upper and lower curve plateaus (delta HR, in
bpm), P3 is a curvature coefficient that is independent of range, and
P4 is MAP at one-half of the HR range (MAP50, in mmHg),
which is also the point for the calculation of the maximum gain. The upper plateau
was calculated by the sum of P1 and P2 (7,8, and references
therein).Chemoreflex sensitivity was tested under the same methodological conditions, but
after the administration of increasing intravenous doses of potassium cyanide (KCN;
60, 100, 140, and 180 µg/kg; Merck, Germany). Injected volumes ranged from 0.06 to
0.18 mL. Mean HR and MAP were measured continuously 10 s before and 15 s after each
injection of these KCN doses. The inter-injection interval for each dose of KCN was
around 4 min, and a new dose was administered only when appropriate HR and MAP
baselines had been reestablished (7,8).
Power spectral analysis and symbolic analysis
These analyses demonstrate the different components in the variability of the HR and
AP recordings and were applied to the results of the experimental groups as long as
technically possible. For this reason, some results from the Ang II groups were not
sufficient for further analyses and are shown only when they could be reliably
done.These methodological descriptions were reported previously (7,8 and references
therein). Briefly, power spectral analysis was applied to pulse interval (PI) and
systolic arterial pressure (SAP) series. Tachograms and systograms were created from
AP signals through the beat-to-beat PI and SAP, respectively. Frequency domain
analysis of HRV (PI variability) and AP variability (APV) were obtained with an
autoregressive algorithm on stationary sequences of 200 beats that were randomly
chosen, but without artifacts, using the stationary test based on very low
quantification of oscillations. Spectral estimation by the autoregressive model,
using the residual theorem, provides central frequency and associated power with the
additional advantage that, even with short segments of data, they can provide a
reliable spectral resolution. HRV and APV correspond to the total power spectrum of
PI and SAP.The low-frequency (LF; 0.2-0.75 Hz) and high-frequency (HF; 0.75-3.0 Hz) spectral
components of PI and SAP were expressed in both absolute (ms2 and
mmHg2, respectively) and normalized units (NU). NU were obtained by
calculating the power of LF and HF and correlating them to the total power without
the very low frequency component (frequencies that were <0.2 Hz). This method
estimates the center frequency and power of each relevant oscillatory component and
indicates the involvement of the central control of the sympathetic/parasympathetic
systems in the cardiovascular responses. The ratio between LF and HF components
(LF/HF) was considered a synthetic expression of the sympathovagal balance. The
coherence between the PI and the SAP variability was assessed by means of a
cross-spectral analysis. The alpha index was obtained from the square root of the
ratio between the R-R interval and the SAP variability within the LF ranges and was
calculated only when the magnitude of the squared coherence exceeded 0.5 (range=0 to
1) in the LF band. Using this alpha index for the LF component, beat-to-beat values
of the PI and the SAP were used to estimate spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity.Symbolic analysis was applied on the same sequences of PI and SAP data. This method
consisted of the scattering of the time series over 6 bins, each identified by a
number (symbol) from 0 to 5. Symbolic series is a sequence of symbols for each bin,
converted into patterns of 3 symbols. All 3 possible beat patterns are divided into 4
groups as follows: 1) no variations (0V, i.e., three identical
symbols), 2) one variation (1V, two identical symbols and 1
different), 3) two like variations (2LV), and 4)
two unlike variations (2UV). The 0V is a marker of sympathetic modulation, a 1V
pattern reflects sympathetic and parasympathetic modulations, a 2LV pattern indicates
sympathetic and parasympathetic modulations with vagal predominace, and 2UV is an
exclusive marker of vagal modulation (see Ref. 31 and references therein).
Histological procedure
At the end of the experiments, rats were deeply anesthetized as described earlier and
transcardially perfused with saline and 10% formalin solution. Brains were cut into
60-µm thick sections using a vibratome (Leica, Germany) and stained with hematoxylin
and eosin. The microinjection site was histologically determined and compared to the
images of an atlas (30). This microinjection
procedure was validated for accurate drug administration in small brain regions
(32) - further comments about the effects
of microinjected substances in the MePD can be found elsewhere (7,8). Only those rats that
had the microinjections directed to the MePD were considered for further analysis.
Data from rats that had intraparenchimatous hemorrhage, mechanical lesions in the
MePD, or microinjections that damaged the stria terminalis were not included.Approximate sites for drug spread in the targeted area are shown in Figure 2A and B. As described previously (8), an inherent technical limitation of the
present methodological approach is that drugs may have affected all parts of local
neurons and glial cells, including both cell bodies and their prolongments. The
specific diffusion rate for each of the substances microinjected into the MePD was
not directly evaluated, and the average radius of drug diffusion was not estimated by
virtue of comparing a dye with distinct physicochemical properties with the
microinjected drugs. However, it is assumed that substances can diffuse an average
radius of 0.5 mm from the point of microinjection (32). Here, it is also likely that the position of the guide cannula for
the microinjection let the substances spread from the medial border of the MePD
through its neuropil, and the coarse axons of the optic tract, situated in the back
of the microinjection site, might have limited drug diffusion outside the MePD.Nevertheless, non-target groups were also included to control for drug effects
outside the intended area (n=7 rats for each microinjected substance). Cannulae and
microinjections reached the vicinity of the MePD in these non-target groups, and
their data served to evaluate possible effects of the tested drugs in other medial
amygdala subnuclei, other adjacent amygdaloid nuclei, in the optic tract, or in the
ventral basal ganglia, all structures close to the MePD (Figure 2).
Statistical analysis
The basic requirements for the use of parametric analysis were assessed by the
Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests. After that, the values of HR, SAP, diastolic AP
(DAP), and MAP at basal conditions and the results of HR and AP evoked by the
chemoreceptor reflex response were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
for repeated measures. Data obtained after the stimulation of the baroreflex were
analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The Newman-Keuls post hoc test was
used for multiple comparisons.The normal distribution of data from spectral and symbolic analyses was determined by
the Bonferroni test. After that, the results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA
followed by the Tukey test. When Gaussian normality failed, a Kruskal-Wallis test on
ranks and the Dunn's test were performed. In all cases, the statistically significant
level was set a priori as P≤0.05.
Results
Present results focus on the MePD results. To be concise, the non-target control data
did not reproduce in any way the effects obtained in the experimental groups
microinjected with the different neuropeptides in the MePD (ANOVA, P>0.05 in all
cases; data not shown).
Hemodynamic status
Basal hemodynamic values were within normal ranges for adult male rats recorded under
laboratory conditions. No relevant statistical difference was found in the HR, SAP,
DAP, and MAP following microinjections of saline or OT, SST, and Ang II (ANOVA,
P>0.05 in all cases). There were no lasting effects of the microinjections in any
experimental group, which provided stable baseline recordings prior to the assessment
of the baroreflex and the chemoreflex responses (Table 1).
Effects of baroreflex activation
Reflex control of the HR was analyzed by fitting sigmoidal curves to different data
points of each animal. Mean values were calculated for each experimental group (Figure 3). The MAP50, which describes
the MAP value at one-half of the HR range in the baroreflex curve, following the
injections of phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside showed an overall statistical
difference between groups [F(6,47)=3.37, P<0.01]. The post hoc
comparisons revealed that the MePD microinjection of OT (10 ng) or SST (1 μM)
promoted a significant decrease in the MAP50, shifting the barocurve to
the left and to lower HR values when compared with the results from the saline
microinjected group (P<0.05 in both cases).
Figure 3
Plots showing the average values for the relationship between mean arterial
blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), using logistic sigmoidal baroreceptor
curve analysis, of rats that received the following microinjections in the
posterodorsal medial amygdala: saline (0.3 µL, n=7), oxytocin (10 ng/0.3 µL and
25 pg/0.3 µL, n=6 in both groups), somatostatin (1 µM/0.3 µL, n=8 and 0.05
μM/0.3 µL, n=5), or angiotensin II (50 pmol/0.3 µL and 50 fmol/0.3 µL; n=7 in
both groups).
An overall statistical difference was also found in the maximum gain of the reflex
responses when the AP was increased by phenylephrine or decreased by sodium
nitroprusside when compared between the experimental groups [F(6,47)=2.56,
P<0.03], but post hoc comparisons did not show differences
between any tested substances compared with saline. For the HR range [F(6,47)=1.29,
P=0.27], the lower plateau [F(6,47)=1.53, P=0.19] and the upper plateau
[F(6,47)=1.19, P=0.09] did not differ between the experimental groups.
Effects of chemoreflex activation
Data for chemoreflex activation are shown in Figure
4. There was a statistically significant difference in the HR after
injection of the increasing doses of KCN [F(3,123)=69.77, P=0.01] and between
experimental groups microinjected into the MePD [F(6,123)=2.82, P=0.02], but no
statistical interaction was found between these two factors [F(18,123)=1.51,
P=0.09].
Figure 4
A, Heart rate (HR) and B, mean arterial blood
pressure (MAP) of the chemoreceptor reflex response induced by increasing doses
of potassium cyanide (KCN, from 60 to 180 µg/kg) in rats that received
microinjections into the posterodorsal medial amygdala of saline (0.3 µL, n=7),
oxytocin (OT; 10 ng/0.3 µL and 25 pg/0.3 µL, n=6 in both groups), somatostatin
(SST; 1 µM/0.3 µL, n=8 and 0.05 μM/0.3 µL, n=5), or angiotensin II (Ang II; 50
pmol/0.3 µL and 50 fmol/0.3 µL; n=7 in both groups). Data are reported as
means±SD. Data were submitted to the two-way ANOVA test for repeated measures
and the Newman-Keuls post hoc test. In A, for
HR: *P<0.01 compared with 60 µg/kg KCN in the group microinjected with
saline. **P<0.01 compared with 60 µg/kg KCN in the group microinjected with
OT 10 ng. +P<0.01 compared with 60 µg/kg KCN in the group
microinjected with OT 25 pg. †P<0.01 compared with 60 µg/kg KCN
in the group microinjected with SST 0.05 μM. ‡P<0.05 compared
with 60 µg/kg KCN in the group microinjected with Ang II 50 pmol. In
B, for MAP: *P<0.01 compared with 60 µg/kg KCN in the
group microinjected with OT 10 ng. +P<0.05 compared with 140
µg/kg KCN in the group microinjected with SST 1 µM. †P<0.05
compared with 180 µg/kg KCN in the group microinjected with saline.
‡P<0.05 compared with 180 µg/kg KCN in the group microinjected
with OT 10 ng. Expanded and adapted from Ref. 6 with permission from Nova
Science Publishers (USA).
On the other hand, the values of MAP obtained after the injection of the different
doses of KCN reached statistically significant levels [F(3,123)=17.26, P=0.01] and,
although data did not differ between the experimental groups [F(6,123)=1.08, P=0.38],
the interaction between these two factors was significantly different
[F(18,123)=2.22, P<0.01]. The post hoc test showed that, compared
with saline, OT (10 ng) microinjected into the MePD led to a marked increase in the
MAP following KCN (180 µg/kg; P<0.05). No other comparison showed a significant
statistical difference between the experimental groups and the saline group
(P>0.05).
Power spectral analysis
Power spectral analysis results are shown in Table
2 and Figure 5. There were no
statistically significant differences in the SAP [F(5,33)=1.63; P=0.17], in the mean
values of HR [F(5,33)=2.01; P=0.10], in the absolute LF component [F(5,33)=1.87;
P=0.125], or in the absolute HF component of the SAP between the experimental groups
[F(5,33)=1.41; P=0.24].
Figure 5
Power spectrum and symbolic analysis applied to a time series of
cardiovascular parameters of rats. The columns show the pulse interval series,
power spectrum and the symbolic pattern distribution for the data obtained from
the experimental groups that received microinjections into the posterodorsal
medial amygdala with A, saline (0.3 µL, n=7),
B, oxytocin 10 ng and C, 25 pg (n=6 in
both groups), D, somatostatin 1 µM (n=8) and
E, 0.05 μM (n=5), or F, angiotensin II 50
pmol (for the power spectral analysis) and 50 fmol (for the symbolic analysis;
n=7 in both groups). Values are from representative samples of each
experimental group. Mean values for all studied animals are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
However, the HRV analysis showed a statistically significant difference between
experimental groups [F(5,33)=4.50; P<0.05]. The post hoc
comparison showed that OT (25 pg), SST (1 and 0.05 μM), and Ang II (50 pmol) led to
increased values compared with saline (P<0.05 in all cases). In addition, the LF
component of the HRV, in NU, presented a statistically significant difference between
the experimental groups [F(5,33)=2.61; P<0.05] and the post hoc
test indicated that SST (1 µM and 0.05 μM) promoted an increase in this parameter
compared with saline (P<0.05 in both cases). There was also an overall difference
in the absolute power of the HF component of the HRV [F(5,33)=2.65; P<0.05], and
the post hoc comparison showed that OT (10 ng) promoted an increase
in this parameter compared with saline (P<0.05).The sympathetic/parasympathetic balance obtained from the alpha index also showed a
statistically significant difference between experimental groups [F(5,33)=2,71;
P<0.05] and, specifically, SST (0.05 μM) promoted higher values compared with
saline (Newman-Keuls test, P <0.05).
Symbolic analysis
Results are presented in Table 3 and Figure 5. Compared with control data, the
microinjections of OT (10 ng and 25 pg) and SST (1 and 0.05 μM) did not cause evident
effects (Newman-Keuls test, P>0.05), but there was a significant decrease in the
2UV pattern after Ang II (50 fmol) microinjection into the MePD when compared with
saline [F(5,34)=2.282, P<0.05; Newman-Keuls test, P<0.05].
Discussion
Our present results reinforce findings that the ratMePD is a component of the central
network that modulates baroreceptor- and chemoreceptor-mediated cardiovascular
adjustments. These data match with the evident presence of neuropeptides and their
receptors in the MePD (18-22) and indicate functional implications that deserve further
evaluation, as follows.First, it is interesting that the tested neuropeptides promoted long-lasting effects (in
the order of minutes) when microinjected into the MePD, as previously reported for
classical neurotransmitters [glutamate, GABA, and histamine], which appears to be a
particularity of this brain area (7,8). In addition, the MePD contributes more to
changes in cardiovascular reflexes than in basal HR and AP levels. As occurs for other
amygdaloid nuclei (33), it is possible that
transmitter-mediated excitatory, inhibitory, and/or disinhibitory mechanisms in the MePD
can promote a flexible, dose- and context-dependent modulation of the central control of
sympathetic/parasympathetic output (6). We also
propose that the ratMePD is responsive to different neurotransmitters and neuropeptides
that code distinct synaptic inputs for specific fine-tunings of centrally mediated
cardiovascular reflexes and the dynamic display of behaviors in awake animals (7,8). It is
now desirable to determine how neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the MePD can
modulate the activity of specific output pathways that reach other brain areas related
to central cardiovascular control.Second, all the neuropeptides tested here evoked a higher HRV as revealed by the power
spectral analysis. The predominant central sympathetic or parasympathetic modulation of
the cardiovascular system involves the balance between the spectral components in favor
of the LF or the HF band, respectively (34).
However, it is noteworthy that OT microinjections into the MePD did not cause specific
effects on the parameters evaluated by the symbolic analysis. Then, it is possible that
higher absolute LF and HF power values (after OT 25 pg and 10 ng, respectively) can be
explained by the increase in HRV itself and the change of the HF peak value, which is
also associated with ventilatory components and might be correlated with an increased
respiratory rate following OT (10 ng) microinjection into the MePD. The participation of
ratMePD in the central control of breathing is currently unknown. This is a working
hypothesis that needs to be confirmed with other methodological approaches and opens a
new and interesting line of research.Indeed, OT can have site-specific roles on the central modulation of cardiovascular
responses instead of similar and widespread actions. For example, although
intracerebroventricular injection of OT did not evoke significant cardiovascular effects
(35), unilateral microinjections of an OT
receptor antagonist in the NTS reduced the long-lasting vasopressor and tachycardic
responses elicited by local microinjection of this neuropeptide (24). OT also counteracted the vasodepressor and bradycardic
responses induced by glutamate in this nucleus (24). Data from the CeA, a component of the extended amygdala, provided
another interpretation for the effects of OT (36). That is, OT microinjected into the CeA promoted an elevation in plasma
corticosterone, but not epinephrine and norepinephrine. At the same time, the induction
of a tachycardic response was attributable to a somatic-sympathetic/parasympathetic
coupling rather than to a genuine “autonomic” activation (36). Here, the microinjection of OT into the MePD also appeared to
affect central cardiovascular control only indirectly.Otherwise, microinjection of SST into the MePD caused an increase in the HRV suggestive
of a central sympathetic and parasympathetic coactivation. Because this finding was also
accompanied by an increase in the LF (in NU), they rather point to changes in the
central sympathetic regulation. This increase in the HRV was also accompanied by a
higher alpha index, which indicates the relationship between the LF components of the
HRV and the APV along with an increase in baroreflex sensitivity. The precise mechanism
by which SST exerts its effects in the MePD still remains to be established. SST
inhibits the presynaptic release of glutamate, activates potassium channels, and
inhibits voltage-gated calcium channels via sst2 or sst5 receptors (37 and references therein). SST can also promote an
inhibitory action by acting directly on its receptors or indirectly via GABAergic
synapses in the MeA (21). From our present
results, SST induced a central sympathetic effect, whereas, comparatively, GABA in the
MePD decreased the upper plateau of the baroreflex curve and induced higher values of
HRV linked with the central parasympathetic control of the cardiovascular system (8). Therefore, these findings demonstrate
non-overlapping effects of SST and GABA on cardiovascular responses when acting in the
ratMePD.Finally, microinjection of Ang II into the MePD increased the HRV, did not affect power
spectral components, but reduced the 2UV pattern of the symbolic analysis, which was
linked to cardiac vagal activity in pharmacological tests (38). In the group microinjected with 50 pmol ANG II, it is also
possible that the lower bradycardic response produced by pressure increase was related
to the blunting of the parasympathetic component, and the higher baroreflex gain
observed could be associated with the higher tachycardic response after AP reduction.
Microinjection, electrophysiological, and lesion studies demonstrate complex
interactions and multiple sites for the action of Ang II on cardiovascular control and
in different brain areas (26-29). It is interesting that AT1A receptors are
involved in neuronal activation and cardiovascular change after an olfactory-mediated
psychosocial stress in mice (39). Acting in the
MeA, Ang II might inhibit stress-induced aversive responses (39). However, no strain difference (between spontaneously
hypertensive and normotensive Wistar male rats) was identified in c-Fos immunoreactivity
in the MeA after aversive air jet or air noise stress stimulation (40). Then, it is possible that different species and/or types and
intensity of sensory stimulation can trigger the Ang II-evoked responses. Marked central
Ang II actions on the cardiovascular system, partly stimulating sympathetic responses
(27), were not found after its microinjection
into the MePD. Rather, we found a central parasympathetic effect and, in agreement with
NTS data (29), Ang II in the MePD potentiated the
chemoreflex-mediated decrease in HR frequency. These new findings add and expand the
idea of site-specific effects of Ang II on central cardiovascular control and reinforce
the multiple modulatory actions of the MePD.In summary, our work provides additional data for MePD modulation of the baroreflex and
chemoreflex cardiovascular responses in awake rats. Local microinjections promoted
neuropeptidergic-selective responses and involved the central activation of the
sympathetic and parasympathetic effector systems. This MePD plastic capacity could
provide the animal with a dynamic mechanism of cardiovascular control suitable for the
ongoing demands of social behaviors, for which the MePD is a relevant component in
integrated brain circuits (2-6,9-11). Besides the adjustment of homeostatic
responses, these neuropeptidergic actions in the MePD can also be involved in the
pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension (14-16), a possibility that
deserves further studies as well.
Authors: Gloria B Choi; Hong-Wei Dong; Andrew J Murphy; David M Valenzuela; George D Yancopoulos; Larry W Swanson; David J Anderson Journal: Neuron Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Stefano Guzzetti; Ester Borroni; Pietro E Garbelli; Elisa Ceriani; Paolo Della Bella; Nicola Montano; Chiara Cogliati; Virend K Somers; Alberto Malliani; Alberto Mallani; Alberto Porta Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-07-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E Quagliotto; H Neckel; D F Riveiro; K R Casali; C Mostarda; M C Irigoyen; P Dall'ago; A A Rasia-Filho Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Nicolas Singewald; Gary G Chicchi; Clemens C Thurner; Kwei-Lan Tsao; Mariana Spetea; Helmut Schmidhammer; Hari Kishore Sreepathi; Francesco Ferraguti; Georg M Singewald; Karl Ebner Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Brunella F Klippel; Licia B Duemke; Marcos A Leal; Andreia G F Friques; Eduardo M Dantas; Rodolfo F Dalvi; Agata L Gava; Thiago M C Pereira; Tadeu U Andrade; Silvana S Meyrelles; Bianca P Campagnaro; Elisardo C Vasquez Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 4.566