| Literature DB >> 34285714 |
Renata Streck Fernandes1,2, Henrique Bregolin Dias3, Wynnie Amaral de Souza Jaques1, Tiago Becker4, Katya Rigatto1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is characterized by an accelerated decline in pulmonary function and has limited treatment options. Alamandine (ALA) is a recently described protective peptide of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with essential tasks in several conditions. Our group previously demonstrated that ALA is reduced by 365% in the plasma of patients with idiopathic PF, and thus, it is plausible to believe that stimulation of this peptide could represent an important therapeutic target. In this sense, this study investigates the effects of ALA in an experimental model of PF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34285714 PMCID: PMC8265028 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9975315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst ISSN: 1470-3203 Impact factor: 1.636
Figure 1Effect of alamandine on development of pulmonary fibrosis. (a) Bodyweight variation (%) analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison posttest. (b) Ashcroft modified score (F = 33.10) and collagen area quantification in the lungs (F = 8.285). (c) Representative images of effects at two weeks after alamandine treatment on histological findings and collagen deposition in the lungs. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Masson's trichrome (TM) staining. Magnification at 400x. CO: animals that received only saline; ALA: saline intratracheally and alamandine in the osmotic minipumps; BLM: bleomycin intratracheally and saline in the osmotic minipumps; BLM+ALA: bleomycin intratracheally and alamandine in the osmotic minipumps. Arrows: alveolar septa; asterisks: fibrous bands or fibrous masses; arrowhead: inflammatory cells. Tissue changes were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison posttest. All data represent mean ± SEM; n = 7 − 9. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Lung mechanics on day 14. (a) Elastance, F = 11.28. (b) Compliance, F = 20.50. (c) Resistance: level of constriction, F = 8.672. CO: animals that received only saline; ALA: saline intratracheally and alamandine in the osmotic minipumps; BLM: bleomycin intratracheally and saline in the osmotic minipumps; BLM+ALA: bleomycin intratracheally and alamandine in the osmotic minipumps. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test was used. Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 6 − 7; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 3Pearson's correlation between Ashcroft score and pulmonary elastance. (a) BLM and BLM+ALA groups (R2 = 0.7143). (b) BLM group (R2 = 0.8640). (c) BLM+ALA group (R2 = 0.1347). BLM: bleomycin intratracheally and saline in the osmotic minipumps; BLM+ALA: bleomycin intratracheally and alamandine in the osmotic minipumps; N = 7. •: BLM group. °: BLM+ALA group.
Hemodynamic data and spectral and symbolic analysis results. CO: control rats; ALA: rats treated only with alamandine; BLM: rats treated with bleomycin; BLM+ALA: rats treated with bleomycin+alamandine. HR: heart rate; bpm: beats per minute; ABP: average blood pressure. HRV: heart rate variability; LF: low- and HF: high-frequency component; a: absolute and nu: normalized units. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison posttest was used for ABP and HR evaluation. The Kruskal-Wallis and the post hoc Dunn's multiple comparison tests were performed to detect differences in spectral and symbolic analysis. Data represent mean ± SEM, and a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Spectral analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO ( | ALA ( | BLM ( | BLM+ALA ( |
| |
| ABP (mmHg) | 75 ± 6 | 70 ± 3 | 74 ± 5 | 77 ± 3 | 0.81 |
| HR (bpm) | 299 ± 16 | 269 ± 17 | 251 ± 11 | 267 ± 10 | 0.14 |
| HRV (ms2) | 9.18 ± 2.26 | 9.58 ± 2.81 | 9.43 ± 4.28 | 12.69 ± 6.68 | 0.90 |
| LFa (ms2) | 2.12 ± 0.74 | 3.15 ± 1.38 | 1.31 ± 0.37 | 2.12 ± 0.86 | 0.68 |
| HFa (ms2) | 5.50 ± 1.63 | 4.30 ± 0.98 | 7.07 ± 4.12 | 6.03 ± 2.47 | 0.96 |
| LFnu | 0.32 ± 0.09 | 0.32 ± 0.07 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.96 |
| HFnu | 0.68 ± 0.09 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.96 |
| LF/HF ratio | 0.83 ± 0.38 | 0.62 ± 0.19 | 0.56 ± 0.21 | 0.50 ± 0.16 | 0.97 |
| Symbolic analysis (%) | |||||
| 0V pattern | 0.101 ± 0.006 | 0.100 ± 0.019 | 0.111 ± 0.027 | 0.111 ± 0.010 | 0.99 |
| 1V pattern | 0.370 ± 0.010 | 0.372 ± 0.021 | 0.361 ± 0.017 | 0.392 ± 0.010 | 0.40 |
| 2LV pattern | 0.102 ± 0.014 | 0.091 ± 0.012 | 0.103 ± 0.012 | 0.075 ± 0.014 | 0.34 |
| 2UV pattern | 0.418 ± 0.020 | 0.434 ± 0.031 | 0.424 ± 0.035 | 0.413 ± 0.020 | 0.94 |