Sharif A Halim1, Megan L Neely1, Karen S Pieper1, Svati H Shah1, William E Kraus1, Elizabeth R Hauser1, Robert M Califf1, Christopher B Granger1, L Kristin Newby2. 1. From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (S.A.H., S.H.S., W.E.K., R.M.C., C.B.G., L.K.N.), Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (M.L.N.), Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.A.H., M.L.N., K.S.P., S.H.S., C.B.G., L.K.N.), Duke Center for Human Genetics (S.H.S., E.R.H.), and Duke Translational Medicine Institute (R.M.C.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 2. From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (S.A.H., S.H.S., W.E.K., R.M.C., C.B.G., L.K.N.), Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (M.L.N.), Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.A.H., M.L.N., K.S.P., S.H.S., C.B.G., L.K.N.), Duke Center for Human Genetics (S.H.S., E.R.H.), and Duke Translational Medicine Institute (R.M.C.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. kristin.newby@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although individual protein biomarkers are associated with cardiovascular risk, rarely have multiple proteins been considered simultaneously to identify which set of proteins best predicts risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a nested case-control study of 273 death/myocardial infarction (MI) cases and 273 age- (within 10 years), sex-, and race-matched and event-free controls from among 2023 consecutive patients (median follow-up 2.5 years) with suspected coronary disease, plasma levels of 53 previously reported biomarkers of cardiovascular risk were determined in a core laboratory. Three penalized logistic regression models were fit using the elastic net to identify panels of proteins independently associated with death/MI: proteins alone (Model 1); proteins in a model constrained to retain clinical variables (Model 2); and proteins and clinical variables available for selection (Model 3). Model 1 identified 6 biomarkers strongly associated with death/MI: intercellular adhesion molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinase-3, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, soluble CD40 ligand, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2. In Model 2, only soluble CD40 ligand remained strongly associated with death/MI when all clinical risk predictors were retained. Model 3 identified a set of 6 biomarkers (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinase-3, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, soluble CD40 ligand, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2) and 5 clinical variables (age, red-cell distribution width, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin, and New York Heart Association class) strongly associated with death/MI. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneously assessing the association between multiple putative protein biomarkers of cardiovascular risk and clinical outcomes is useful in identifying relevant biomarker panels for further assessment.
BACKGROUND: Although individual protein biomarkers are associated with cardiovascular risk, rarely have multiple proteins been considered simultaneously to identify which set of proteins best predicts risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a nested case-control study of 273 death/myocardial infarction (MI) cases and 273 age- (within 10 years), sex-, and race-matched and event-free controls from among 2023 consecutive patients (median follow-up 2.5 years) with suspected coronary disease, plasma levels of 53 previously reported biomarkers of cardiovascular risk were determined in a core laboratory. Three penalized logistic regression models were fit using the elastic net to identify panels of proteins independently associated with death/MI: proteins alone (Model 1); proteins in a model constrained to retain clinical variables (Model 2); and proteins and clinical variables available for selection (Model 3). Model 1 identified 6 biomarkers strongly associated with death/MI: intercellular adhesion molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinase-3, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, soluble CD40 ligand, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2. In Model 2, only soluble CD40 ligand remained strongly associated with death/MI when all clinical risk predictors were retained. Model 3 identified a set of 6 biomarkers (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinase-3, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, soluble CD40 ligand, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2) and 5 clinical variables (age, red-cell distribution width, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin, and New York Heart Association class) strongly associated with death/MI. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneously assessing the association between multiple putative protein biomarkers of cardiovascular risk and clinical outcomes is useful in identifying relevant biomarker panels for further assessment.
Authors: Svati H Shah; Christopher B Granger; Elizabeth R Hauser; William E Kraus; Jie-Lena Sun; Karen Pieper; Charlotte L Nelson; Elizabeth R Delong; Robert M Califf; L Kristin Newby Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Christopher R deFilippi; James A de Lemos; Robert H Christenson; John S Gottdiener; Willem J Kop; Min Zhan; Stephen L Seliger Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cynthia M Westerhout; Yuling Fu; Michael S Lauer; Stefan James; Paul W Armstrong; Eyad Al-Hattab; Robert M Califf; Maarten L Simoons; Lars Wallentin; Eric Boersma Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-09-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Eleanor Danielson; Francisco A H Fonseca; Jacques Genest; Antonio M Gotto; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Peter Libby; Alberto J Lorenzatti; Jean G MacFadyen; Børge G Nordestgaard; James Shepherd; James T Willerson; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D A Morrow; N Rifai; E M Antman; D L Weiner; C H McCabe; C P Cannon; E Braunwald Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mark A Hlatky; Philip Greenland; Donna K Arnett; Christie M Ballantyne; Michael H Criqui; Mitchell S V Elkind; Alan S Go; Frank E Harrell; Yuling Hong; Barbara V Howard; Virginia J Howard; Priscilla Y Hsue; Christopher M Kramer; Joseph P McConnell; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sidney C Smith; Peter W F Wilson Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William E Kraus; Christopher B Granger; Michael H Sketch; Mark P Donahue; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Elizabeth R Hauser; Carol Haynes; L Kristin Newby; Melissa Hurdle; Z Elaine Dowdy; Svati H Shah Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Debby Ngo; Sumita Sinha; Dongxiao Shen; Eric W Kuhn; Michelle J Keyes; Xu Shi; Mark D Benson; John F O'Sullivan; Hasmik Keshishian; Laurie A Farrell; Michael A Fifer; Ramachandran S Vasan; Marc S Sabatine; Martin G Larson; Steven A Carr; Thomas J Wang; Robert E Gerszten Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ziyi He; Justin Huffman; Kathrine Curtin; Krista L Garner; Elizabeth C Bowdridge; Xiaojun Li; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Peng Li Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 6.986