Literature DB >> 25421923

Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review.

Pieter-Jan Hofkens1, Anton Verrijcken, Kelly Merveille, Stef Neirynck, Niels Van Regenmortel, Inneke De Laet, Karen Schoonheydt, Hilde Dits, Berthold Bein, Wolfgang Huber, Manu L N G Malbrain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is less invasive than a pulmonary artery catheter, and is increasingly used in the Intensive Care Unit and the Operating Room. Optimal treatment of the critically ill patient demands adequate, precise and continuous monitoring of clinical parameters. Little is known about staff knowledge of the basic principles and practical implementation of TPTD measurements at the bedside. The aims of this review are to: 1) present the results of a survey on the knowledge of TPTD measurement among 252 nurses and doctors; and 2) to focus on specific situations and common pitfalls in order to improve patient management in daily practice.
METHODS: Web-based survey on knowledge of PiCCO technology (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany), followed by PubMed and Medline search with review of the relevant literature regarding the use of TPTD in specific situations.
RESULTS: In total, 252 persons participated in the survey: 196 nurses (78%) and 56 medical doctors (22%) of whom 17 were residents in training. Knowledge on the use of TPTD appears to be suboptimal, with an average score of 58.3%. Doctors performed better than nurses (62.7% vs 57.0%, P = 0.012). About 190 out of 252 (75.4%) scored at least 50% but only 45 respondents (17.9%) obtained a score of 70% or more. Having five years of PiCCO experience was present in 15.8% of the participants and this was correlated to passing the test, defined as obtaining a test result of ≥ 50% (P = 0.07) or obtaining a test result of ≥ 70% (P = 0.05). There were no other parameters significantly predictive for obtaining a result above 50% or above 70% such as gender or doctor versus nurse or Belgian versus Dutch residency, or years of ICU experience. High quality education of nursing and medical staff is necessary to perform the technique correctly and to analyse and interpret the information that can be obtained. Visual inspection of thermodilution curves is important as this can point towards specific pathology. Interpretation of the parameters that can be obtained with TPTD in specific conditions is discussed. Finally, a practical approach is given in ten easy steps for nurses and doctors.
CONCLUSION: TPTD has gained its place in the haemodynamic monitoring field, but, as with any technique, its virtue is only fully appreciated with correct use and interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25421923     DOI: 10.5603/AIT.a2014.0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther        ISSN: 1642-5758


  20 in total

1.  A systematic database-derived approach to improve indexation of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived global end-diastolic volume.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Sebastian Mair; Simon Q Götz; Julia Tschirdewahn; Johanna Frank; Josef Höllthaler; Veit Phillip; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Sebastian Mair; Julia Tschirdewahn; Simon Götz; Johanna Frank; Veit Phillip; Benedikt Henschel; Caroline Schultheiss; Ulrich Mayr; Sebastian Noe; Matthias Treiber; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Mandatory criteria for the application of variability-based parameters of fluid responsiveness: a prospective study in different groups of ICU patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Uli Mayr; Andreas Umgelter; Michael Franzen; Wolfgang Reindl; Roland M Schmid; Florian Eckel
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 4.  State-of-the-art literature review methodology: A six-step approach for knowledge synthesis.

Authors:  Erin S Barry; Jerusalem Merkebu; Lara Varpio
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2022-09-05

5.  Extravascular lung water levels are associated with mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Gavelli; Rui Shi; Jean-Louis Teboul; Danila Azzolina; Pablo Mercado; Mathieu Jozwiak; Michelle S Chew; Wolfgang Huber; Mikhail Y Kirov; Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Tobias Lahmer; Manu L N G Malbrain; Jihad Mallat; Samir G Sakka; Takashi Tagami; Tài Pham; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 19.334

6.  Are management decisions in critical patients changed with use of hemodynamic parameters from transpulmonary thermodilution technique?

Authors:  Ye Rim Chang; Seok Ho Choi; Sung Wook Chang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-08

Review 7.  Cardiac Output Monitoring by Pulse Contour Analysis, the Technical Basics of Less-Invasive Techniques.

Authors:  Jörn Grensemann
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-03-06

8.  Accuracy of Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Comparison with Transpulmonary Thermodilution.

Authors:  Ole Broch; Berthold Bein; Matthias Gruenewald; Sarah Masing; Katharina Huenges; Assad Haneya; Markus Steinfath; Jochen Renner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Increased extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) reflects rapid non-cardiogenic oedema and mortality in COVID-19 associated ARDS.

Authors:  Tobias Lahmer; Wolfgang Huber; Sebastian Rasch; Paul Schmidle; Sengül Sancak; Alexander Herner; Christina Huberle; Dominik Schulz; Ulrich Mayr; Jochen Schneider; Christoph D Spinner; Fabian Geisler; Roland M Schmid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Accuracy of an autocalibrated pulse contour analysis in cardiac surgery patients: a bi-center clinical trial.

Authors:  Ole Broch; Jose Carbonell; Carlos Ferrando; Malte Metzner; Arne Carstens; Martin Albrecht; Matthias Gruenewald; Jan Höcker; Marina Soro; Markus Steinfath; Jochen Renner; Berthold Bein
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.