PURPOSE: Although night-shift work has been associated with elevated risk of breast cancer in numerous epidemiologic studies, evidence is not consistent. We conducted a nested case-cohort study to investigate a possible association between shift work including a night shift and risk of breast cancer within a large cohort of women textile workers in Shanghai, China. METHODS: The study included 1,709 incident breast cancer cases and 4,780 non-cases. Data on historical shift work schedules were collected by categorized jobs from the factories, where the study subjects had worked, and then were linked to the complete work histories of each subject. No jobs in the factories involved exclusively night-shift work. Therefore, night shift was evaluated as part of a rotating shift work pattern. Hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using Cox proportional hazards modeling adapted for the case-cohort design for years of night-shift work and the total number of nights worked. Additionally, analyses were repeated with exposures lagged by 10 and 20 years. RESULTS: We observed no associations with either years of night-shift work or number of nights worked during the entire employment period, irrespective of lag intervals. Findings from the age-stratified analyses were very similar to those observed for the entire study population. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study provide no evidence to support the hypothesis that shift work increases breast cancer risk. The positive association between shift work and breast cancer observed in Western populations, but not observed in this and other studies of the Chinese population, suggests that the effect of shift work on breast cancer risk may be different in Asian and Caucasian women.
PURPOSE: Although night-shift work has been associated with elevated risk of breast cancer in numerous epidemiologic studies, evidence is not consistent. We conducted a nested case-cohort study to investigate a possible association between shift work including a night shift and risk of breast cancer within a large cohort of women textile workers in Shanghai, China. METHODS: The study included 1,709 incident breast cancer cases and 4,780 non-cases. Data on historical shift work schedules were collected by categorized jobs from the factories, where the study subjects had worked, and then were linked to the complete work histories of each subject. No jobs in the factories involved exclusively night-shift work. Therefore, night shift was evaluated as part of a rotating shift work pattern. Hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using Cox proportional hazards modeling adapted for the case-cohort design for years of night-shift work and the total number of nights worked. Additionally, analyses were repeated with exposures lagged by 10 and 20 years. RESULTS: We observed no associations with either years of night-shift work or number of nights worked during the entire employment period, irrespective of lag intervals. Findings from the age-stratified analyses were very similar to those observed for the entire study population. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study provide no evidence to support the hypothesis that shift work increases breast cancer risk. The positive association between shift work and breast cancer observed in Western populations, but not observed in this and other studies of the Chinese population, suggests that the effect of shift work on breast cancer risk may be different in Asian and Caucasian women.
Authors: Wenjin Li; Roberta M Ray; Johanna W Lampe; Ming-Gang Lin; Dao Li Gao; Chunyuan Wu; Zakia C Nelson; E Dawn Fitzgibbons; Neilann Horner; Yong Wei Hu; Jackilen Shannon; Jessie A Satia; Ruth E Patterson; Helge Stalsberg; David B Thomas Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-07-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Michelle D Althuis; Jaclyn M Dozier; William F Anderson; Susan S Devesa; Louise A Brinton Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: D B Thomas; D L Gao; S G Self; C J Allison; Y Tao; J Mahloch; R Ray; Q Qin; R Presley; P Porter Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-03-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: E S Schernhammer; F Laden; F E Speizer; W C Willett; D J Hunter; I Kawachi; G A Colditz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-10-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David B Thomas; Dao Li Gao; Roberta M Ray; Wen Wan Wang; Charlene J Allison; Fan Liang Chen; Peggy Porter; Yong Wei Hu; Guan Lin Zhao; Lei Da Pan; Wenjin Li; Chunyuan Wu; Zakia Coriaty; Ilonka Evans; Ming Gang Lin; Helge Stalsberg; Steven G Self Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Florence Menegaux; Alexandru Popa; Sylvia Rabstein; Volker Harth; Beate Pesch; Thomas Brüning; Lin Fritschi; Deborah C Glass; Jane S Heyworth; Thomas C Erren; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Kyriaki Papantoniou; Ana Espinosa; Manolis Kogevinas; Anne Grundy; John J Spinelli; Kristan J Aronson; Pascal Guénel Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Ruth C Travis; Angela Balkwill; Georgina K Fensom; Paul N Appleby; Gillian K Reeves; Xiao-Si Wang; Andrew W Roddam; Toral Gathani; Richard Peto; Jane Green; Timothy J Key; Valerie Beral Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 13.506