Hongyun So1, Kunwoo Lee, Niren Murthy, Albert P Pisano. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center and ‡Department of Bioengineering, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Abstract
This paper describes a handheld device that uses an all-in-one membrane for continuous mechanical cell lysis and rapid DNA isolation without the assistance of power sources, lysis reagents, and routine centrifugation. This nanowire-decorated multifunctional membrane was fabricated to isolate DNA by selective adsorption to silica surface immediately after disruption of nucleus membranes by ultrasharp tips of nanowires for a rapid cell lysis, and it can be directly assembled with commercial syringe filter holders. The membrane was fabricated by photoelectrochemical etching to create microchannel arrays followed by hydrothermal synthesis of nanowires and deposition of silica. The proposed membrane successfully purifies high-quality DNA within 5 min, whereas a commercial purification kit needs more than an hour.
This paper describes a handheld device that uses an all-in-one membrane for continuous mechanical cell lysis and rapid DNA isolation without the assistance of power sources, lysis reagents, and routine centrifugation. This nanowire-decorated multifunctional membrane was fabricated to isolate DNA by selective adsorption to silica surface immediately after disruption of nucleus membranes by ultrasharp tips of nanowires for a rapid cell lysis, and it can be directly assembled with commercial syringe filter holders. The membrane was fabricated by photoelectrochemical etching to create microchannel arrays followed by hydrothermal synthesis of nanowires and deposition of silica. The proposed membrane successfully purifies high-quality DNA within 5 min, whereas a commercial purification kit needs more than an hour.
Effective
extraction of nucleic acid from biological samples is
an essential technique for a variety of reasons such as genetic testing,
objective identification, and analysis of forensic evidence. Since
most polymerase chain reaction (PCR) devices have required high-quality
DNA to amplify for analysis effectively, various lysis protocols and
purification techniques have been extensively investigated during
the past decade.[1−3] The emergence of lab-on-a-chip (LOC) has also significantly
affected the development of new DNA purification tools. These new
tools are compact and compatible with microchips and provide a fast,
cost-effective, and high-throughput process with high-quality DNA.[4,5] Among many purification approaches—including selective precipitation[6] and the use of silica-based resins[7] and magnetic beads[8]—silica-based methods have been found to isolate DNA handily
without specialized equipment (such as a centrifuge, electrical source,
or magnetic controller) and minimize DNA degradation, which might
be caused by the shear force resulting from spin centrifugation during
non-silica-based processes.[9] As a result,
new silica-based DNA purification chips using the LOC platform have
recently been developed to fulfil the increasing requirements of market
for a faster, easier, and more reliable process.In all approaches,
cell lysis is the first and one of the most
important steps to release nucleic acids by disrupting cell and nucleus
membranes. In conventional cell lysis methods—including chemical,[10] acoustic,[11] electrical,[12] and mechanical[13,14] methods—mechanical
methods, which allow fast cell lysis while maintaining the integrity
of extracted components, are the ones most commonly used to obtain
nucleic acids.[15] However, since cell lysis
must be conducted prior to the DNA purification step, two separate
devices or protocols for each step have generally been needed to isolate
the DNA, resulting in increased fabrication cost and process time,
and loss of extracted DNA for analysis. Clearly, special LOC-based
designs are required to rapidly lyse cells and to immediately isolate
DNA from the lysate for a simple process, minimum loss of extracted
nucleic acid, and direct analysis. Various types of silica-based DNA
purification devices using silica pillars,[16,17] sol–gel,[18] or silica-coated beads[19] have been extensively developed during the past
decade. However, most of them have concentrated on the integration
of structures within a single microfluidic channel and have involved
complex fabrication processes in which multiple steps, such as lithography,
wet etching, reactive-ion etching, alignment, multilayer deposition,
and anodic bonding, have been needed to fabricate a whole device.
Such devices also might limit the yield of isolated DNA due to the
restricted surface area of silica in a single microchannel. Therefore,
the development of a novel DNA purification device combined with an
effective cell lysis chip still remains an engineering challenge for
simple, rapid, compact, and direct analysis.In this paper,
we propose a handheld device using an all-in-one
nanowire-decorated multifunctional membrane (NMM) for continuous mechanical
cell lysis and rapid DNA purification without the assistance of additional
power sources, lysis reagents, and routine centrifugation. As a first
step, the efficiency of the cell lysis could be dramatically improved
by using the ultrasharp tips of nanowires (NWs) decorated on the periphery
of the vertically aligned microchannel, which were fabricated through
photoelectrochemical (PEC) etching. The direct assembly of the developed
all-in-one membrane with a commercial syringe filter holder also minimizes
the overall sample preparation time, as well as the fabrication cost.Schematic
of the direct assembly of the nanowire-decorated multifunctional
membrane with a commercial handheld syringe filter holder for mechanical
cell lysis and DNA purification. Overall sequential process: (a)–(d).Figure 1 depicts a schematic illustration
of the overall device, which comprises three main parts: a commercial
syringe, the developed all-in-one membrane, and a syringe filter holder.
The NMM is also composed of three main parts: a porous silicon surface
decorated with zinc oxide (ZnO) nanowires for mechanical cell lysis,
vertically aligned microchannels for the transport of the lysate after
lysis, and a silica surface for binding DNA, as seen in the circle
showing the zoomed-in view of the membrane in Figure 1. The NMM is placed in the middle of a syringe filter holder,
and two silicone gaskets are used to tightly hold the NMM minimizing
flow leakage through the edges of the membrane. This assembled device
makes cells flow directly across the NMM, and thus be disrupted by
the ultrasharp tips of nanowires for lysing. The illustration on the
right side in Figure 1 depicts the sequential
and automated process of separating DNA from proteins and other cellular
contaminants using the proposed all-in-one membrane. Cells are first
mixed with a binding buffer. After the solution is put in a commercial
syringe, the syringe filter holder combined with the NMM is directly
plugged into the syringe. Although some of the cells can be chemically
disrupted by the binding buffer containing chaotropic salts, mechanical
cell lysis method by ultrasharp tips of the nanostructures was adopted
again based on our previously reported study to significantly improve
the cell lysis efficiency.[14] The cells
are then released through the NMM by easily pressing a plunger piston
(Figure 1a). The intracellular proteins and
nucleic acids inside the cells are released and transported through
the silica-coated microchannels where the DNA is selectively adsorbed
due to the intermolecular electrostatic force and hydrogen bond formation
in the DNA-silica contact layer[20] (Figure 1b). By the injection of a wash buffer, all other
cellular contaminants and proteins pass through the channels while
the DNA remains bonded to the silica surface (Figure 1c). Finally, the captured DNA is released with an elution
solution (Figure 1d).
Figure 1
Schematic
of the direct assembly of the nanowire-decorated multifunctional
membrane with a commercial handheld syringe filter holder for mechanical
cell lysis and DNA purification. Overall sequential process: (a)–(d).
Experimental
Section
Fabrication of the NMM
The overall fabrication process
for the all-in-one NMM includes four main processes: PEC etching to
create coherent porous silicon, deep reactive-ion etching (DRIE) to
form a thin membrane, hydrothermal synthesis to decorate the nanowires
over the porous silicon membrane, and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor
deposition (PECVD) to coat the inside of the pores and the back surface
with 1 μm thickness of silicon dioxide (SiO2). For
an anisotropic wet etching to form a porous silicon, n-type ⟨100⟩
silicon wafer with 10–20 Ω-cm resistivity was anodized
by the PEC etcher (MPSB 150, AMMT GmbH, Frankenthal, Germany) in 5.5
wt % hydrofluoric acid for 120 min. During the etching, the back side
of the wafer was illuminated by a near-ultraviolet (UV, 365 nm wavelength)
source (Figure 2a). The applied voltage of
3.6 V and current density of 8.6 mA/cm2 were maintained
constant during the PEC etching. The bulk silicon on the back side
of the sample was then patterned using standard lithography (Figure 2b) and removed by DRIE to create a through-hole
thin membrane with 13 mm diameter (Figure 2c), which fits perfectly into a 13 mm commercial syringe filter holder
(Swinnex 13 Filter Holders, Millipore, Bedford, MA).
Figure 2
Schematic illustration of the NMM fabrication process: (a) photoelectrochemical
etching, (b) pattern of photoresist mask for DRIE, (c) DRIE, (d) deposition
of ZnO NPs seed layer, (e) hydrothermal ZnO NWs growth, and (f) PECVD
of SiO2 on the back side.
In preparation
for NWs synthesis, the front side of the porous silicon membrane was
spin-coated by a droplet of ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) (40 wt % in ethanol,
Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as shown in Figure 2d. The sample was then rinsed by ethanol after 30 s, and this
seeding process was repeated two times to deposit a uniform seed layer
for ZnO NWs growth. NWs were synthesized by immersing the seeded sample
in a solution containing 25 mM zinc nitrate hydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, Sigma-Aldrich), 5 mM polyethylenimine
(PEI, C2H5N, branched, low molecular weight,
Sigma-Aldrich) and 25 mM hexamethylenetetramine (C6H12N4, Sigma-Aldrich) at 90 °C for 2 h[21−23] as seen in Figure 2e. For binding DNA, SiO2 was finally deposited using PECVD (PlasmaLab 80plus, Oxford
Instruments) with 25 W at 350 °C, which allows conformal coverage
through the pore walls and back side of the porous silicon membrane
(Figure 2f). In the process, nitrous oxide
(N2O, 800 sccm) and 10% silane (SiH4, 100 sccm)
in argon (Ar, inert carrier gas, 100 sccm) were used as the source
of oxygen and silicon, respectively. The approximated deposition rate
of SiO2 film was 50 nm/min at 0.9 Torr pressure. The deposited
amorphous SiO2 has a compressive stress of 255.7 MPa (FLX-2320,
KLA-Tencor, Milpitas, CA) and refractive index of 1.442 (Stokes LSE,
Gaertner, Skokie, IL). Figure 3 shows the experimental
images of the NMM fabrication process for more detailed experimental
description. Figure 4 shows SEM images of the
porous silicon membrane before and after deposition of ZnO NPs. As
seen in Figure 4c,d, ZnO NPs were uniformly
deposited on top of the porous silicon membrane with an average diameter
of 75 nm.
Figure 3
Experimental images of the NMM fabrication process: (a) photoelectrochemical
etching, (b) porous silicon after PEC etching, (c) photoresist mask
pattern on back side for DRIE, (d) array of through-hole porous silicon
membrane after DRIE, (e) deposition of ZnO NPs seed layer, (f) hydrothermal
ZnO NWs growth, and (g) PECVD for SiO2 deposition.
Figure 4
SEM images of the porous silicon membrane before
deposition of
NPs: (a) top surface view and (b) zoomed-in view of macropores and
the porous silicon membrane after deposition of NPs: (c) top surface
view and (d) zoomed-in view of uniformly deposited NPs on the porous
membrane. Scale bars: (a) 10 μm, (b) 1 μm, (c) 3 μm,
and (d) 400 nm.
Schematic illustration of the NMM fabrication process: (a) photoelectrochemical
etching, (b) pattern of photoresist mask for DRIE, (c) DRIE, (d) deposition
of ZnO NPs seed layer, (e) hydrothermal ZnO NWs growth, and (f) PECVD
of SiO2 on the back side.Experimental images of the NMM fabrication process: (a) photoelectrochemical
etching, (b) porous silicon after PEC etching, (c) photoresist mask
pattern on back side for DRIE, (d) array of through-hole porous silicon
membrane after DRIE, (e) deposition of ZnO NPs seed layer, (f) hydrothermal
ZnO NWs growth, and (g) PECVD for SiO2 deposition.SEM images of the porous silicon membrane before
deposition of
NPs: (a) top surface view and (b) zoomed-in view of macropores and
the porous silicon membrane after deposition of NPs: (c) top surface
view and (d) zoomed-in view of uniformly deposited NPs on the porous
membrane. Scale bars: (a) 10 μm, (b) 1 μm, (c) 3 μm,
and (d) 400 nm.
Cell Preparation
In this study, hepatocellular carcinoma
cell line (HepG2) and immortalized human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and
HeLa cell line, gifts from Berkeley Tissue Culture Facility, were
cultured in a 5% (v/v) CO2 incubator at 37 °C and
kept in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (Gibco, Grand Island,
NY), which was mixed with 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (10 000
units/mL, Gibco) and 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco).[14] The cells were cultured for 5 days prior to
the experiment and separated from the culture dish using 0.05% trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) treatment and then prepared
in culture media just before the experiment. The cells populations
at a concentration of 5 × 105 mL–1 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, Gibco) were counted by
a hemocytometer and used for the proposed method and commercial purification
kit method.
Protocol for DNA Purification
Cells
in PBS are first
mixed with 100 μL of binding buffer (High-Cutoff, Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA). After putting the solution in a commercial syringe,
the syringe filter holder combined with the NMM was connected to the
syringe. The solution was then infused toward the NMM by simply pushing
a syringe piston. As a second step, a wash buffer of 100 μL
(Invitrogen) was injected to remove all other cellular contaminants
and proteins through the pores while DNA remains bound to the silica
surface. Captured DNA was finally eluted with 5–20 μL
of elution buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5) and collected into a microcentrifuge
tube.
Gel Electrophoresis
To obtain as DNA band for qualitative
analysis, eluted DNA from each method was analyzed with gel electrophoresis.
1% agarose gel was used for electrophoresis at 140 V for 30 min. Gel
staining was conducted with a Sybr Safe DNA gel stain (Life Technologies)
and the gel image was taken with a ChemiDoc XRS (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA).
PCR Amplification of Human Papillomavirus
Gene
Primers
were designed to amplify human papillomavirus (HPV) protein E6 and
E7. DNAs isolated from the developed method and conventional method
were PCR-amplified using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New
England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). PCR cycles were set up with the manufacturer’s
manual and the C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was
used. After PCR amplification, samples were analyzed by 1% agarose
gel electrophoresis, followed by staining and imaging as described
above.
Characterization
To characterize the purification performance
of the NMM, HepG2 and HaCaT were used in this study. The detailed
cell preparation for the experiment is described in the Experimental Section. Figure 5 shows
the proposed all-in-one device and experimental protocol for rapid
DNA purification using the handheld syringe assembled with the NMM
and a syringe filter holder. The NMM is fixed in the middle of a syringe
filter holder, and the NWs surface of the membrane faces the syringe
tip, which allows rapid disruption of cells by the ultrasharp tips
of the NWs (Figure 5a). After a solution containing
cells and binding buffer was added to a commercial syringe, the syringe
filter holder combined with the NMM was simply connected to the syringe
(Figure 5b). Finally, the cells were infused
toward the NMM by easily pushing a syringe piston, followed by the
injection of a wash buffer to remove other cellular contaminants with
proteins and an elution buffer to release the captured DNA from the
NMM surface (Figure 5c). To evaluate the purification
efficiency of the NMM method including total process time, concentration,
and quality of extracted DNA, the DNA purification protocol using
a commercially available DNA purification kit (PureLink Genomic DNA
Mini Kit, Invitrogen) was performed and compared to one obtained using
the developed all-in-one device. The concentrations of purified DNA
were measured using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific,
Waltham, MA) with a wavelength of 260 nm, the appropriate wavelength
to measure the optical absorbance of nucleic acids in soluble cell
lysates.
Figure 5
(a) Assembly of the proposed all-in-one
membrane with a commercial
syringe filter holder and membrane filter; (b) direct connection of
the filter holder to a handheld syringe; (c) rapid DNA purification
after flowing three different buffers through the all-in-one membrane.
To investigate the mechanical limitation of the NMM,
the membrane
was assembled with a syringe filter holder and the breakage of the
membrane was monitored by increasing the internal pressure in the
syringe. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 6a. The pressure in the syringe was controlled by changing
the volumetric flow rate from 1 to 10 mL/min using a syringe pump
(KDS210, KD Scientific, Holliston, MA) and was monitored using a pressure
sensor (40PC500G2A, Honeywell, Morristown, NJ). As a result, it was
observed that the NMM was not fractured at all even at the internal
pressure of 275 kPa as seen in Figure 6b. Considering
an experimental volumetric flow rate between 4 and 5 mL/min (corresponding
average internal pressure: 30.6 and 54.7 kPa, respectively) generated
by the finger force used in this study, it was confirmed that the
NMM was sturdy enough to endure the applied pressure during mechanical
cell lysis and DNA isolation process.
Figure 6
(a) Schematic illustration of experimental setup
to monitor the
pressure in the syringe while pushing a plunger piston and (b) measured
internal pressure in the syringe with respect to the volumetric flow
rate.
(a) Assembly of the proposed all-in-one
membrane with a commercial
syringe filter holder and membrane filter; (b) direct connection of
the filter holder to a handheld syringe; (c) rapid DNA purification
after flowing three different buffers through the all-in-one membrane.(a) Schematic illustration of experimental setup
to monitor the
pressure in the syringe while pushing a plunger piston and (b) measured
internal pressure in the syringe with respect to the volumetric flow
rate.
Results and Discussion
Figure 7a,b shows the actual size of the
all-in-one membrane and a tilted surface view of the fabricated NMM
with an average pore radius of 2.95 μm and a porosity of 32.8%
(12 000 pores/mm2) after PEC etching. Figure 7b shows the high-aspect-ratio and vertically aligned
microchannel arrays with an average length of 130 μm used for
the transport of lysate after lysis. Close-up views of the ultrasharp
tips of the NWs and macropores decorated with NWs after hydrothermal
synthesis are shown in parts (c) and (d), respectively, of Figure 7. The ultrasharp tips of NWs on the periphery of
the straight microchannels are able to lyse cells rapidly by disrupting
the membranes of both the cell and the nucleus immediately after infusing
the cells into the NMM with finger pressure. Considering the extremely
rough surface of the NMM, the developed membrane can also filter out
cell debris by catching it between the nanowires, which significantly
reduces overall sample preparation time for the DNA purification protocol
by skipping routine centrifugation to remove debris after cell lysis.
Figure 7
SEM images of fabricated
all-in-one nanowire-decorated multifunctional
membrane: (a) size comparison between the fabricated 13 mm diameter
all-in-one membrane and a U.S. one-cent coin, (b) 45° tilted
view, (c) close-up view of ultrasharp tips of nanowires, and (d) close-up
top view of macropores decorated with nanowires. Scale bars: (b) 20
μm, (c) 200 nm, and (d) 1 μm.
To demonstrate the rapid and direct cell lysis by the nanowires
as a first step for DNA isolation, the HepG2 cells in PBS with different
concentrations were infused toward the NMM by pushing a syringe piston.
Parts (a) and (b) of Figure 8 show the scanning
electron microscope (SEM) images of the NMM after cell lysis, including
the top view and the close-up view of the membrane lipids captured
between the NWs, respectively. The HepG2 cells with a diameter of
approximately 10 μm were successfully disrupted by the ultrasharp
tips of the NWs, and the NWs were unbroken. To demonstrate the filtering
performance of the NMM, the lysate was directly collected into a microcentrifuge
tube and centrifuged at 15 000 rpm for 15 min. As a result,
the debris (lipids of cells membrane) were not detected in the lysate
that had filtered through the NMM, allowing fast cell lysis and direct
analysis due to the absence of routine centrifugation. For quantitative
analysis, concentrations of extracted proteins and nucleic acids were
evaluated using a spectrophotometer where 280 and 260 nm wavelengths
were used to measure the optical absorbance of proteins and nucleic
acids in lysates, respectively. Figure 9 shows
the total concentrations of extracted protein and nucleic acid in
each lysate with different cell populations. It was found that both
intracellular protein and nucleic acid concentrations were proportionally
increased as the cell concentration was increased as shown in the
figure. Therefore, the NMM could provide the lysate within 1 min by
ultrasharp tips of nanowires allowing rapid mechanical cell lysis,
and thus significantly reducing the total lysis time.
Figure 8
SEM images of the nanowire-decorated multifunctional membrane after
cell lysis: (a) ruptured and filtrated lipids of cell membrane and
(b) close-up view of membrane lipids between NWs, ruptured by ultrasharp
tips of NWs. Scale bars: (a) 20 μm and (b) 600 nm.
Figure 9
Concentrations of the intracellular protein and nucleic
acid with
different cell concentrations after HepG2 cell lysing using all-in-one
membrane.
SEM images of fabricated
all-in-one nanowire-decorated multifunctional
membrane: (a) size comparison between the fabricated 13 mm diameter
all-in-one membrane and a U.S. one-cent coin, (b) 45° tilted
view, (c) close-up view of ultrasharp tips of nanowires, and (d) close-up
top view of macropores decorated with nanowires. Scale bars: (b) 20
μm, (c) 200 nm, and (d) 1 μm.SEM images of the nanowire-decorated multifunctional membrane after
cell lysis: (a) ruptured and filtrated lipids of cell membrane and
(b) close-up view of membrane lipids between NWs, ruptured by ultrasharp
tips of NWs. Scale bars: (a) 20 μm and (b) 600 nm.Concentrations of the intracellular protein and nucleic
acid with
different cell concentrations after HepG2 cell lysing using all-in-one
membrane.(a) Concentration of DNA eluted from
the developed method using
all-in-one membrane and the commercial purification kit (cells: HepG2
and HaCaT), (b) comparison of quality of extracted DNA using commercial
kit and all-in-one device by gel electrophoresis (cell: HeLa), and
(c) PCR amplification product of human papillomavirus gene from the
extracted HeLa DNA. Lane 1, ladder; lane 2, commercial kit; and lane
3, developed all-in-one device.Figure 10a shows the concentration
of the
eluted DNA obtained from the proposed all-in-one device and commercially
available purification kit. Because the volume of elution buffer used
for the NMM method was smaller than the volume used for the commercial
kit, it is obvious that the DNA concentrations purified using the
all-in-one membrane (80.37 ± 7.62 ng μL–1 for HepG2 and 69.13 ± 3.5 ng μL–1 for
HaCaT) were higher than the concentrations purified by the commercial
purification kit (52.5 ± 13 ng μL–1 for
HepG2 and 37.3 ± 4.9 ng μL–1 for HaCaT);
the total average amounts of eluted HepG2 DNA using the commercial
kit (5250 ng; 3735 ng for HaCaT) were about 13 times (11 times for
HaCaT) higher than the sample purified by the NMM method (401.8 ng;
345.6 ng for HaCaT). This is mainly because the spin column in the
commercial kit has a much larger surface area of silica structure
than that of the NMM. However, since the maximum amount of capturable
DNA is proportional to the surface area of silica medium, the dimensions
of the NMM including pore size, porosity, membrane thickness, and
diameter can be scaled up to capture more DNA. In terms of cost and
efficiency, it is also noticeable that the NMM method can be usefully
utilized for fast and point-of-care diagnostics on DNA because the
NMM method can extract PCR-amplifiable DNA in 5 min with a relatively
small volume of elution buffer while at least 50 μL of elution
buffer—enough to flow across the thick silica medium of the
spin column—is necessary for the commercial kit to produce
a minimum yield of isolated DNA. The total processing time from cell
lysis to DNA purification using the all-in-one membrane was also less
than 5 min compared to at least 1 h for purifying the DNA using the
commercial purification kit. This is mainly because the purification
method using all-in-one membrane does not require the incubation and
centrifugation steps, which are essential for chemical cell lysis
and DNA purification using a spin column in a commercial kit process.
Figure 10
(a) Concentration of DNA eluted from
the developed method using
all-in-one membrane and the commercial purification kit (cells: HepG2
and HaCaT), (b) comparison of quality of extracted DNA using commercial
kit and all-in-one device by gel electrophoresis (cell: HeLa), and
(c) PCR amplification product of human papillomavirus gene from the
extracted HeLa DNA. Lane 1, ladder; lane 2, commercial kit; and lane
3, developed all-in-one device.
To demonstrate qualitatively the reliability of rapid DNA purification
using the fabricated all-in-one membrane, DNA purification was conducted
on a HeLa cell line (a gift from the Berkeley Tissue Culture Facility,
an immortal cell line derived from HPV-infected cervical cancer cells)
and analyzed with agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by Sybr nucleic
acid staining to visualize the purified nucleic acids. Figure 10b shows that genomic DNA was successfully purified
by the developed method using the NMM, whereas DNA purified by the
commercial kit for 1 h still had some remnant RNAs that showed up
as smeared broad bands. This result shows that pure genomic DNA of
high quality could be isolated using the NMM method in about 10 times
less time than the conventional method. Considering that a major application
of DNA purification is in the diagnosis of disease, the HPV genome,
which causes cancer by integrating itself into a human genome, was
detected by amplifying the HPV sequence in HeLa DNA. Figure 10c demonstrates that the PCR detection of amplified
HPV sequence from HeLa DNA purified by the NMM was as clear as one
from HeLa DNA purified by the commercial kit. Therefore, the results
proved that the NMM purification method can be applied for fast and
simple diagnostics by isolating high-quality DNA within a shorter
period of time.
Conclusions
In this
study, an all-in-one device using nanowire-decorated multifunctional
membrane was developed for rapid cell lysis and DNA purification to
extract nucleic acids from cells without the assistance of power sources
and isolate genomic DNA using selective adsorption to a silica surface.
This membrane was created by a combined fabrication process by the
PEC etching for forming bulk porous silicon, DRIE for forming a thin
membrane, hydrothermal synthesis for decorating nanowires over the
porous silicon membrane, and PECVD for coating a thick silica layer
to capture the DNA in the lysate. The fabricated all-in-one membrane
was handily assembled with a commercially available syringe filter
holder and a syringe. As a first step for DNA purification, rapid
mechanical cell lysis was successfully achieved by ultrasharp tips
of nanowires, significantly reducing the total lysis time. After injecting
sequential buffers, DNA could be rapidly isolated and released from
the back side of the NMM, providing fast and highly efficient DNA
isolation for diagnostics based on DNA sequence. This study shows
the feasibility of rapid and facile DNA purification for point-of-care
diagnostics of disease within a short period of time by reducing many
complicated process steps and the use of specialized equipment.
Authors: M Nagy; P Otremba; C Krüger; S Bergner-Greiner; P Anders; B Henske; M Prinz; L Roewer Journal: Forensic Sci Int Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 2.395
Authors: Ulrike Lehmann; Caroline Vandevyver; Virendra K Parashar; Martin A M Gijs Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2006-05-05 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Beatriz Pelaz; Christoph Alexiou; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Frauke Alves; Anne M Andrews; Sumaira Ashraf; Lajos P Balogh; Laura Ballerini; Alessandra Bestetti; Cornelia Brendel; Susanna Bosi; Monica Carril; Warren C W Chan; Chunying Chen; Xiaodong Chen; Xiaoyuan Chen; Zhen Cheng; Daxiang Cui; Jianzhong Du; Christian Dullin; Alberto Escudero; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Michael George; Yury Gogotsi; Arnold Grünweller; Zhongwei Gu; Naomi J Halas; Norbert Hampp; Roland K Hartmann; Mark C Hersam; Patrick Hunziker; Ji Jian; Xingyu Jiang; Philipp Jungebluth; Pranav Kadhiresan; Kazunori Kataoka; Ali Khademhosseini; Jindřich Kopeček; Nicholas A Kotov; Harald F Krug; Dong Soo Lee; Claus-Michael Lehr; Kam W Leong; Xing-Jie Liang; Mei Ling Lim; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Paolo Macchiarini; Huan Meng; Helmuth Möhwald; Paul Mulvaney; Andre E Nel; Shuming Nie; Peter Nordlander; Teruo Okano; Jose Oliveira; Tai Hyun Park; Reginald M Penner; Maurizio Prato; Victor Puntes; Vincent M Rotello; Amila Samarakoon; Raymond E Schaak; Youqing Shen; Sebastian Sjöqvist; Andre G Skirtach; Mahmoud G Soliman; Molly M Stevens; Hsing-Wen Sung; Ben Zhong Tang; Rainer Tietze; Buddhisha N Udugama; J Scott VanEpps; Tanja Weil; Paul S Weiss; Itamar Willner; Yuzhou Wu; Lily Yang; Zhao Yue; Qian Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Xian-En Zhang; Yuliang Zhao; Xin Zhou; Wolfgang J Parak Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 15.881