Literature DB >> 25419818

Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of graph knowledge.

Elizabeth R Chrastil1, William H Warren1.   

Abstract

It is known that active exploration of a new environment leads to better spatial learning than does passive visual exposure. We ask whether specific components of active learning differentially contribute to particular forms of spatial knowledge-the exploration-specific learning hypothesis. Previously, we found that idiothetic information during walking is the primary active contributor to metric survey knowledge (Chrastil & Warren, 2013). In this study, we test the contributions of 3 components to topological graph and route knowledge: visual information, idiothetic information, and cognitive decision making. Four groups of participants learned the locations of 8 objects in a virtual hedge maze by (a) walking or (b) watching a video, crossed with (1) either making decisions about their path or (2) being guided through the maze. Route and graph knowledge were assessed by walking in the maze corridors from a starting object to the remembered location of a test object, with frequent detours. Decision making during exploration significantly contributed to subsequent route finding in the walking condition, whereas idiothetic information did not. Participants took novel routes and the metrically shortest routes on the majority of both direct and barrier trials, indicating that labeled graph knowledge-not merely route knowledge-was acquired. We conclude that, consistent with the exploration-specific learning hypothesis, decision making is the primary component of active learning for the acquisition of topological graph knowledge, whereas idiothetic information is the primary component for metric survey knowledge. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419818     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  18 in total

1.  Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Bryan Maghen; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

2.  Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Xinyi Gong; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

3.  Does active learning benefit spatial memory during navigation with restricted peripheral field?

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Body Position Spatial Task, a Test of Whole-Body Spatial Cognition: Comparison Between Adults With and Without Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Jessica Battisto; Katharina V Echt; Steven L Wolf; Paul Weiss; Madeleine E Hackney
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Local Patterns to Global Architectures: Influences of Network Topology on Human Learning.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Age-Related Changes in Spatial Navigation Are Evident by Midlife and Differ by Sex.

Authors:  Shuying Yu; Alexander P Boone; Chuanxiuyue He; Rie C Davis; Mary Hegarty; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 7.  Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.

Authors:  Michael Peer; Iva K Brunec; Nora S Newcombe; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Physical exploration of a virtual reality environment: Effects on spatiotemporal associative recognition of episodic memory.

Authors:  Daniël van Helvoort; Emil Stobbe; Richard Benning; Henry Otgaar; Vincent van de Ven
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-07

9.  Impact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition.

Authors:  Xiaohe Qiu; Lala Wen; Changxu Wu; Zhen Yang; Qijun Wang; Hongting Li; Duming Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-16

10.  Sex Differences in Using Spatial and Verbal Abilities Influence Route Learning Performance in a Virtual Environment: A Comparison of 6- to 12-Year Old Boys and Girls.

Authors:  Edward C Merrill; Yingying Yang; Beverly Roskos; Sara Steele
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.