Eric J Feuer1, Borsika A Rabin1, Zhaohui Zou1, Zhuoqiao Wang1, Xiaoqin Xiong1, Jennifer L Ellis1, John F Steiner1, Laurie Cynkin1, Larissa Nekhlyudov1, Elizabeth Bayliss1, Benjamin F Hankey2. 1. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJF, LC); Cancer Research Network Cancer Communication Research Center (BAR); and Institute for Health Research (JLE, JFS), Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO; Information Management Services, Inc., Calverton, MD (ZZ, ZW, XX); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO (EB); Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (LN); CANSTAT, Plano, TX (BFH). 2. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJF, LC); Cancer Research Network Cancer Communication Research Center (BAR); and Institute for Health Research (JLE, JFS), Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO; Information Management Services, Inc., Calverton, MD (ZZ, ZW, XX); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO (EB); Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (LN); CANSTAT, Plano, TX (BFH). bhankey0411@aol.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nomograms for prostate and colorectal cancer are included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Survival Calculator, under development by the National Cancer Institute. They are based on the National Cancer Institute's SEER data, coupled with Medicare data, to estimate the probabilities of surviving or dying from cancer or from other causes based on a set of patient and tumor characteristics. The nomograms provide estimates of survival that are specific to the characteristics of the tumor, age, race, gender, and the overall health of a patient. These nomograms have been internally validated using the SEER data. In this paper, we externally validate the nomograms using data from Kaiser Permanente Colorado. METHODS: The SEER Cancer Survival Calculator was externally validated using time-dependent area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve statistics and calibration plots for retrospective cohorts of 1102 prostate cancer and 990 colorectal cancer patients from Kaiser Permanente Colorado. RESULTS: The time-dependent area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve statistics were computed for one, three, five, seven, and 10 year(s) postdiagnosis for prostate and colorectal cancer and ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for death from cancer and from 0.72 to 0.81 for death from other causes. The calibration plots indicated a very good fit of the model for death from cancer for colorectal cancer and for the higher risk group for prostate cancer. For the lower risk groups for prostate cancer (<10% chance of dying of prostate cancer in 10 years), the model predicted slightly worse prognosis than observed. Except for the lowest risk group for colorectal cancer, the models for death from other causes for both prostate and colorectal cancer predicted slightly worse prognosis than observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the external validation indicated that the colorectal and prostate cancer nomograms are reliable tools for physicians and patients to use to obtain information on prognosis and assist in establishing priorities for both treatment of the cancer and other conditions, particularly when a patient is elderly and/or has significant comorbidities. The slightly better than predicted risk of death from other causes in a health maintenance organization (HMO) setting may be due to an overall healthier population and the integrated management of disease relative to the overall population (as represented by SEER). Published by Oxford University Press 2014.
BACKGROUND: Nomograms for prostate and colorectal cancer are included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Survival Calculator, under development by the National Cancer Institute. They are based on the National Cancer Institute's SEER data, coupled with Medicare data, to estimate the probabilities of surviving or dying from cancer or from other causes based on a set of patient and tumor characteristics. The nomograms provide estimates of survival that are specific to the characteristics of the tumor, age, race, gender, and the overall health of a patient. These nomograms have been internally validated using the SEER data. In this paper, we externally validate the nomograms using data from Kaiser Permanente Colorado. METHODS: The SEER Cancer Survival Calculator was externally validated using time-dependent area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve statistics and calibration plots for retrospective cohorts of 1102 prostate cancer and 990 colorectal cancerpatients from Kaiser Permanente Colorado. RESULTS: The time-dependent area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve statistics were computed for one, three, five, seven, and 10 year(s) postdiagnosis for prostate and colorectal cancer and ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for death from cancer and from 0.72 to 0.81 for death from other causes. The calibration plots indicated a very good fit of the model for death from cancer for colorectal cancer and for the higher risk group for prostate cancer. For the lower risk groups for prostate cancer (<10% chance of dying of prostate cancer in 10 years), the model predicted slightly worse prognosis than observed. Except for the lowest risk group for colorectal cancer, the models for death from other causes for both prostate and colorectal cancer predicted slightly worse prognosis than observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the external validation indicated that the colorectal and prostate cancer nomograms are reliable tools for physicians and patients to use to obtain information on prognosis and assist in establishing priorities for both treatment of the cancer and other conditions, particularly when a patient is elderly and/or has significant comorbidities. The slightly better than predicted risk of death from other causes in a health maintenance organization (HMO) setting may be due to an overall healthier population and the integrated management of disease relative to the overall population (as represented by SEER). Published by Oxford University Press 2014.
Authors: Felix K-H Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-08-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Borsika A Rabin; Bridget Gaglio; Tristan Sanders; Larissa Nekhlyudov; James W Dearing; Sheana Bull; Russell E Glasgow; Alfred Marcus Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Borsika A Rabin; Jennifer L Ellis; John F Steiner; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Eric J Feuer; Benjamin F Hankey; Laurie Cynkin; Elizabeth Bayliss Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Eric J Feuer; Minjung Lee; Angela B Mariotto; Kathy A Cronin; Steve Scoppa; David F Penson; Mark Hachey; Laurie Cynkin; Ginger A Carter; David Campbell; Antoinette Percy-Laurry; Zhaohui Zou; Deborah Schrag; Benjamin F Hankey Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laura L Hester; Steven I Park; William A Wood; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart; Jennifer L Lund Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Borsika A Rabin; Jennifer L Ellis; John F Steiner; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Eric J Feuer; Benjamin F Hankey; Laurie Cynkin; Elizabeth Bayliss Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Angela B Mariotto; Anne-Michelle Noone; Nadia Howlader; Hyunsoon Cho; Gretchen E Keel; Jessica Garshell; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth M Ward; Christopher J Johnson; Kathleen A Cronin; Jiemin Ma; Blythe Ryerson; Angela Mariotto; Andrew J Lake; Reda Wilson; Recinda L Sherman; Robert N Anderson; S Jane Henley; Betsy A Kohler; Lynne Penberthy; Eric J Feuer; Hannah K Weir Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Hyunsoon Cho; Zhuoqiao Wang; K Robin Yabroff; Benmei Liu; Timothy McNeel; Eric J Feuer; Angela B Mariotto Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.295