Nadia Howlader1, Angela B Mariotto2, Steven Woloshin2, Lisa M Schwartz2. 1. Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (NH, AM); Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, White River Junction, VT (SW, LMS). howladern@mail.nih.gov. 2. Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (NH, AM); Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, White River Junction, VT (SW, LMS).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To isolate progress against cancer from changes in competing causes of death, population cancer registries have traditionally reported cancer prognosis (net measures). But clinicians and cancer patients generally want to understand actual prognosis (crude measures): the chance of surviving, dying from the specific cancer and from competing causes of death in a given time period. OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer and actual prognosis in the United States for four leading cancers-lung, breast, prostate, and colon-by age, comorbidity, and cancer stage and to provide templates to help patients, clinicians, and researchers understand actual prognosis. METHOD: Using population-based registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we calculated cancer prognosis (relative survival) and actual prognosis (five-year overall survival and the "crude" probability of dying from cancer and competing causes) for three important prognostic determinants (age, comorbidity [Charlson-score from 2012 SEER-Medicare linkage dataset] and cancer stage at diagnosis). RESULT: For younger, healthier, and earlier stage cancer patients, cancer and actual prognosis estimates were quite similar. For older and sicker patients, these prognosis estimates differed substantially. For example, the five-year overall survival for an 85-year-old patient with colorectal cancer is 54% (cancer prognosis) versus 22% (actual prognosis)-the difference reflecting the patient's substantial chance of dying from competing causes. The corresponding five-year chances of dying from the patient's cancer are 46% versus 37%. Although age and comorbidity lowered actual prognosis, stage at diagnosis was the most powerful factor: The five-year chance of colon cancer death was 10% for localized stage and 83% for distant stage. CONCLUSION: Both cancer and actual prognosis measures are important. Cancer registries should routinely report both cancer and actual prognosis to help clinicians and researchers understand the difference between these measures and what question they can and cannot answer. We encourage them to use formats like the ones presented in this paper to communicate them clearly. Published by Oxford University Press 2014.
BACKGROUND: To isolate progress against cancer from changes in competing causes of death, population cancer registries have traditionally reported cancer prognosis (net measures). But clinicians and cancerpatients generally want to understand actual prognosis (crude measures): the chance of surviving, dying from the specific cancer and from competing causes of death in a given time period. OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer and actual prognosis in the United States for four leading cancers-lung, breast, prostate, and colon-by age, comorbidity, and cancer stage and to provide templates to help patients, clinicians, and researchers understand actual prognosis. METHOD: Using population-based registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we calculated cancer prognosis (relative survival) and actual prognosis (five-year overall survival and the "crude" probability of dying from cancer and competing causes) for three important prognostic determinants (age, comorbidity [Charlson-score from 2012 SEER-Medicare linkage dataset] and cancer stage at diagnosis). RESULT: For younger, healthier, and earlier stage cancerpatients, cancer and actual prognosis estimates were quite similar. For older and sicker patients, these prognosis estimates differed substantially. For example, the five-year overall survival for an 85-year-old patient with colorectal cancer is 54% (cancer prognosis) versus 22% (actual prognosis)-the difference reflecting the patient's substantial chance of dying from competing causes. The corresponding five-year chances of dying from the patient's cancer are 46% versus 37%. Although age and comorbidity lowered actual prognosis, stage at diagnosis was the most powerful factor: The five-year chance of colon cancer death was 10% for localized stage and 83% for distant stage. CONCLUSION: Both cancer and actual prognosis measures are important. Cancer registries should routinely report both cancer and actual prognosis to help clinicians and researchers understand the difference between these measures and what question they can and cannot answer. We encourage them to use formats like the ones presented in this paper to communicate them clearly. Published by Oxford University Press 2014.
Authors: Hyunsoon Cho; Angela B Mariotto; Bhupinder S Mann; Carrie N Klabunde; Eric J Feuer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nadia Howlader; Lynn A G Ries; Angela B Mariotto; Marsha E Reichman; Jennifer Ruhl; Kathleen A Cronin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-10-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Timothy J Daskivich; Kang-Hsien Fan; Tatsuki Koyama; Peter C Albertsen; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; Mark S Litwin; David F Penson Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michel P Coleman; Manuela Quaresma; Franco Berrino; Jean-Michel Lutz; Roberta De Angelis; Riccardo Capocaccia; Paolo Baili; Bernard Rachet; Gemma Gatta; Timo Hakulinen; Andrea Micheli; Milena Sant; Hannah K Weir; J Mark Elwood; Hideaki Tsukuma; Sergio Koifman; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Arduino Verdecchia; Hans H Storm; John L Young Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Julie M Legler; Joan L Warren; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Deborah Schrag Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Eric J Feuer; Minjung Lee; Angela B Mariotto; Kathy A Cronin; Steve Scoppa; David F Penson; Mark Hachey; Laurie Cynkin; Ginger A Carter; David Campbell; Antoinette Percy-Laurry; Zhaohui Zou; Deborah Schrag; Benjamin F Hankey Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Paolo Baili; Andrea Micheli; Roberta De Angelis; Hannah K Weir; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Timo Hakulinen; Manuela Quaresmas; Michel P Coleman Journal: Tumori Date: 2008 Sep-Oct
Authors: Andrew F Brouwer; Kevin He; Steven B Chinn; Alison M Mondul; Christina H Chapman; Marc D Ryser; Mousumi Banerjee; Marisa C Eisenberg; Rafael Meza; Jeremy M G Taylor Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laura L Hester; Steven I Park; William A Wood; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart; Jennifer L Lund Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Angela B Mariotto; Anne-Michelle Noone; Nadia Howlader; Hyunsoon Cho; Gretchen E Keel; Jessica Garshell; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Eric J Feuer; Borsika A Rabin; Zhaohui Zou; Zhuoqiao Wang; Xiaoqin Xiong; Jennifer L Ellis; John F Steiner; Laurie Cynkin; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Elizabeth Bayliss; Benjamin F Hankey Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Ilir Agalliu; Susan Gapstur; Zigui Chen; Tao Wang; Rebecca L Anderson; Lauren Teras; Aimée R Kreimer; Richard B Hayes; Neal D Freedman; Robert D Burk Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 31.777