OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate strain ratio measurement of femoral cartilage using real-time elastosonography. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with femoral cartilage pathology on MRI (study group) were prospectively compared with 25 subjects with normal findings on MRI (control group) using real-time elastosonography. Strain ratio measurements of pathologic and normal cartilage were performed and compared, both within the study group and between the two groups. RESULTS: Elastosonography colour-scale coding showed a colour change from blue to red in pathologic cartilage and only blue colour-coding in normal cartilage. In the study group, the median strain ratio was higher in pathologic cartilage areas compared to normal areas (median, 1.49 [interquartile range, 0.80-2.53] vs. median, 0.01 [interquartile range, 0.01-0.01], p < 0.001, respectively). The median strain ratio of the control group was 0.01 (interquartile range, 0.01-0.01), and there was no significant difference compared to normal areas of the study group. There was, however, a significant difference between the control group cartilage and pathologic cartilage of the study group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elastosonography may be an effective, easily accessible, and relatively simple tool to demonstrate pathologic cartilage and to differentiate it from normal cartilage in the absence of advanced imaging facility such as MRI. KEY POINTS: • Elastosonography uses colour-maps and strain ratios for evaluating tissue deformability. • Colour change from blue to red and increased strain ratio represent softening. • Normal cartilage shows decreased compressibility, represented by blue colour and low strain ratio. • Pathologic cartilage shows increased compressibility, represented by red colour and high strain ratio. • Elastosonography may be used for differentiating pathologic cartilage from normal cartilage.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate strain ratio measurement of femoral cartilage using real-time elastosonography. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with femoral cartilage pathology on MRI (study group) were prospectively compared with 25 subjects with normal findings on MRI (control group) using real-time elastosonography. Strain ratio measurements of pathologic and normal cartilage were performed and compared, both within the study group and between the two groups. RESULTS: Elastosonography colour-scale coding showed a colour change from blue to red in pathologic cartilage and only blue colour-coding in normal cartilage. In the study group, the median strain ratio was higher in pathologic cartilage areas compared to normal areas (median, 1.49 [interquartile range, 0.80-2.53] vs. median, 0.01 [interquartile range, 0.01-0.01], p < 0.001, respectively). The median strain ratio of the control group was 0.01 (interquartile range, 0.01-0.01), and there was no significant difference compared to normal areas of the study group. There was, however, a significant difference between the control group cartilage and pathologic cartilage of the study group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elastosonography may be an effective, easily accessible, and relatively simple tool to demonstrate pathologic cartilage and to differentiate it from normal cartilage in the absence of advanced imaging facility such as MRI. KEY POINTS: • Elastosonography uses colour-maps and strain ratios for evaluating tissue deformability. • Colour change from blue to red and increased strain ratio represent softening. • Normal cartilage shows decreased compressibility, represented by blue colour and low strain ratio. • Pathologic cartilage shows increased compressibility, represented by red colour and high strain ratio. • Elastosonography may be used for differentiating pathologic cartilage from normal cartilage.
Authors: I Möller; D Bong; E Naredo; E Filippucci; I Carrasco; C Moragues; A Iagnocco Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Sinan Tan; Muhammed Fuat Özcan; Fatih Tezcan; Serdar Balci; Mustafa Karaoğlanoğlu; Bülent Huddam; Halil Arslan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tobias De Zordo; Christian Fink; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Vinzenz Smekal; Markus Reindl; Andrea Sabine Klauser Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tobias De Zordo; Stephanie R Lill; Christian Fink; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Werner Jaschke; Rosa Bellmann-Weiler; Andrea S Klauser Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Harun R Gungor; Kadir Agladioglu; Nuray Akkaya; Semih Akkaya; Nusret Ok; Levent Ozçakar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mohamed A Bedewi; Ayman A Elsifey; Moheyeldeen F Naguib; Ayman K Saleh; Naif Bin Nwihadh; Amr A Abd-Elghany; Sherine M Swify Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 1.671