Literature DB >> 25416770

Effects of eliminating pyruvate node pathways and of coexpression of heterogeneous carboxylation enzymes on succinate production by Enterobacter aerogenes.

Yoshinori Tajima1, Yoko Yamamoto2, Keita Fukui2, Yousuke Nishio2, Kenichi Hashiguchi3, Yoshihiro Usuda2, Koji Sode4.   

Abstract

Lowering the pH in bacterium-based succinate fermentation is considered a feasible approach to reduce total production costs. Newly isolated Enterobacter aerogenes strain AJ110637, a rapid carbon source assimilator under weakly acidic (pH 5.0) conditions, was selected as a platform for succinate production. Our previous work showed that the ΔadhE/PCK strain, developed from AJ110637 with inactivated ethanol dehydrogenase and introduced Actinobacillus succinogenes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK), generated succinate as a major product of anaerobic mixed-acid fermentation from glucose under weakly acidic conditions (pH <6.2). To further improve the production of succinate by the ΔadhE/PCK strain, metabolically engineered strains were designed based on the elimination of pathways that produced undesirable products and the introduction of two carboxylation pathways from phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate to oxaloacetate. The highest production of succinate was observed with strain ES04/PCK+PYC, which had inactivated ethanol, lactate, acetate, and 2,3-butanediol pathways and coexpressed PCK and Corynebacterium glutamicum pyruvate carboxylase (PYC). This strain produced succinate from glucose with over 70% yield (gram per gram) without any measurable formation of ethanol, lactate, or 2,3-butanediol under weakly acidic conditions. The impact of lowering the pH from 7.0 to 5.5 on succinate production in this strain was evaluated under pH-controlled batch culture conditions and showed that the lower pH decreased the succinate titer but increased its yield. These findings can be applied to identify additional engineering targets to increase succinate production.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416770      PMCID: PMC4292478          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03213-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  42 in total

Review 1.  Bio-based production of C2-C6 platform chemicals.

Authors:  Yu-Sin Jang; Byoungjin Kim; Jae Ho Shin; Yong Jun Choi; Sol Choi; Chan Woo Song; Joungmin Lee; Hye Gwon Park; Sang Yup Lee
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Succinate production from different carbon sources under anaerobic conditions by metabolic engineered Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Jiangfeng Zhu; George N Bennett; Ka-Yiu San
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 3.  Downstream processing of biotechnological produced succinic acid.

Authors:  Ke-Ke Cheng; Xue-Bing Zhao; Jing Zeng; Ru-Chun Wu; Yun-Zhen Xu; De-Hua Liu; Jian-An Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Efficient succinic acid production from glucose through overexpression of pyruvate carboxylase in an Escherichia coli alcohol dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase mutant.

Authors:  Ailen M Sánchez; George N Bennett; Ka-Yiu San
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

5.  Deletion of lactate dehydrogenase in Enterobacter aerogenes to enhance 2,3-butanediol production.

Authors:  Moo-Young Jung; Chiam Yu Ng; Hyohak Song; Jinwon Lee; Min-Kyu Oh
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Identification of succinate exporter in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its physiological roles under anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  Keita Fukui; Chie Koseki; Yoko Yamamoto; Jun Nakamura; Ayako Sasahara; Reiko Yuji; Kenichi Hashiguchi; Yoshihiro Usuda; Kazuhiko Matsui; Hiroyuki Kojima; Keietsu Abe
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum for biotechnological production of organic acids and amino acids.

Authors:  Volker F Wendisch; Michael Bott; Bernhard J Eikmanns
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Effect of microaerophilic cell growth conditions on expression of the aerobic (cyoABCDE and cydAB) and anaerobic (narGHJI, frdABCD, and dmsABC) respiratory pathway genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C P Tseng; J Albrecht; R P Gunsalus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  pH and base counterion affect succinate production in dual-phase Escherichia coli fermentations.

Authors:  Shiying Lu; Mark A Eiteman; Elliot Altman
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  An efficient succinic acid production process in a metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum strain.

Authors:  Shohei Okino; Ryoji Noburyu; Masako Suda; Toru Jojima; Masayuki Inui; Hideaki Yukawa
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fermentative Production of Cysteine by Pantoea ananatis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Takumi; Mikhail Kharisovich Ziyatdinov; Viktor Samsonov; Gen Nonaka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Impact of an energy-conserving strategy on succinate production under weak acidic and anaerobic conditions in Enterobacter aerogenes.

Authors:  Yoshinori Tajima; Yoko Yamamoto; Keita Fukui; Yousuke Nishio; Kenichi Hashiguchi; Yoshihiro Usuda; Koji Sode
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.328

3.  Engineering cell factories for producing building block chemicals for bio-polymer synthesis.

Authors:  Yota Tsuge; Hideo Kawaguchi; Kengo Sasaki; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.328

4.  Media optimization for economic succinic acid production by Enterobacter sp. LU1.

Authors:  Marcin Podleśny; Agnieszka Kubik-Komar; Jagoda Kucharska; Jakub Wyrostek; Piotr Jarocki; Zdzisław Targoński
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.