Literature DB >> 25415703

Dual-energy MDCT in hypervascular liver tumors: effect of body size on selection of the optimal monochromatic energy level.

Achille Mileto1, Rendon C Nelson, Ehsan Samei, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury, Tracy A Jaffe, Joshua M Wilson, Daniele Marin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of body size on the selection of optimal monochromatic energy level for maximizing the conspicuity of hypervascular liver tumors during late hepatic arterial phase using dual-energy MDCT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic liver phantom in three body sizes and iodine-containing inserts simulating low- and high-contrast hypervascular lesions was imaged with dual- and single-energy MDCT at various energy levels (80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp). Dual-energy MDCT was also performed in 48 patients with 114 hypervascular liver tumors; virtual monochromatic images were reconstructed at energy levels from 40 to 140 keV. The effect of body size and lesion iodine concentration on noise and tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio was compared among different datasets for phantoms and patients.
RESULTS: The highest tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio was noted at 80 kVp for all phantom sizes. On virtual monochromatic images, the minimum noise was noted at 70 keV for small and medium phantoms and at 80 keV for the large phantom. Tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio was highest at 50 keV for small and medium phantoms and at 60 keV for the large phantom (p<0.0001). Compared with 80-kVp images, an optimal monochromatic energy level yielded a significantly higher (p<0.0001) tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio for high-contrast lesions in the large body size and for low-contrast lesions in all phantom sizes. In patients, the optimal monochromatic energy level for tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio increased proportionally along with body size (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Selection of the optimal monochromatic energy level for maximizing the conspicuity of hypervascular liver tumors is significantly affected by patient's body size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MDCT; body size; dual-energy CT; hypervascular liver tumors; virtual monochromatic imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25415703     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications.

Authors:  Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Combining non-contrast and dual-energy CT improves diagnosis of early gout.

Authors:  Seul Ki Lee; Joon-Yong Jung; Won-Hee Jee; Jennifer Jooha Lee; Sung-Hwan Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Can Realistic Liver Tissue Surrogates Accurately Quantify the Impact of Reduced-kV Imaging on Attenuation and Contrast of Parenchyma and Lesions?

Authors:  Andre Euler; Justin Solomon; Paul F FitzGerald; Ehsan Samei; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Use of dual-energy CT for renal mass assessment.

Authors:  Shanigarn Thiravit; Christina Brunnquell; Larry M Cai; Mena Flemon; Achille Mileto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of late hepatic arterial phase dual-energy CT for the detection of hypervascular liver lesions.

Authors:  Carlo N De Cecco; Damiano Caruso; U Joseph Schoepf; Domenico De Santis; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Moritz H Albrecht; Felix G Meinel; Julian L Wichmann; Philip F Burchett; Akos Varga-Szemes; Douglas H Sheafor; Andrew D Hardie
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of quantitative dual-energy CT: evaluation with three different scanner types.

Authors:  Simon Lennartz; Anushri Parakh; Jinjin Cao; David Zopfs; Nils Große Hokamp; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Advanced CT techniques for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Yukiko Honda; Fuminari Tatsugami; Chihiro Tani; Wataru Fukumoto; Keigo Narita; Shota Kondo; Motonori Akagi; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Imaging the renal lesion with dual-energy multidetector CT and multi-energy applications in clinical practice: what can it truly do for you?

Authors:  Achille Mileto; Keitaro Sofue; Daniele Marin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Low kV versus dual-energy virtual monoenergetic CT imaging for proven liver lesions: what are the advantages and trade-offs in conspicuity and image quality? A pilot study.

Authors:  G Jay Hanson; Gregory J Michalak; Robert Childs; Brian McCollough; Anil N Kurup; David M Hough; Judson M Frye; Jeff L Fidler; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Ahmed F Halaweish; W Scott Harmsen; Cynthia H McCollough; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-06

Review 10.  Dual-energy CT in diffuse liver disease: is there a role?

Authors:  Khaled Y Elbanna; Bahar Mansoori; Achille Mileto; Patrik Rogalla; Luís S Guimarães
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.