RATIONALE: We aimed to test the interscan variation of semi-automatic volumetry of subsolid nodules (SSNs), as growth evaluation is important for SSN management. METHODS: From a lung cancer screening trial all SSNs that were stable over at least 3 months were included (N = 44). SSNs were quantified on the baseline CT by two observers using semi-automatic volumetry software for effective diameter, volume, and mass. One observer also measured the SSNs on the second CT 3 months later. Interscan variation was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. Observer agreement was calculated as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as mean (± standard deviation) or median and interquartile range (IQR). A Mann-Whitney U test was used for the analysis of the influence of adjustments on the measurements. RESULTS: Semi-automatic measurements were feasible in all 44 SSNs. The interscan limits of agreement ranged from -12.0 % to 9.7 % for diameter, -35.4 % to 28.6 % for volume and -27.6 % to 30.8 % for mass. Agreement between observers was good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.978, 0.957, and 0.968 for diameter, volume, and mass, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that when using our software an increase in mass of 30 % can be regarded as significant growth. KEY POINTS: • Recently, recommendations regarding subsolid nodules have stressed the importance of growth quantification. • Volumetric measurement of subsolid nodules is feasible with good interscan agreement. • Increase of mass of 30 % can be regarded as significant growth.
RATIONALE: We aimed to test the interscan variation of semi-automatic volumetry of subsolid nodules (SSNs), as growth evaluation is important for SSN management. METHODS: From a lung cancer screening trial all SSNs that were stable over at least 3 months were included (N = 44). SSNs were quantified on the baseline CT by two observers using semi-automatic volumetry software for effective diameter, volume, and mass. One observer also measured the SSNs on the second CT 3 months later. Interscan variation was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. Observer agreement was calculated as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as mean (± standard deviation) or median and interquartile range (IQR). A Mann-Whitney U test was used for the analysis of the influence of adjustments on the measurements. RESULTS: Semi-automatic measurements were feasible in all 44 SSNs. The interscan limits of agreement ranged from -12.0 % to 9.7 % for diameter, -35.4 % to 28.6 % for volume and -27.6 % to 30.8 % for mass. Agreement between observers was good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.978, 0.957, and 0.968 for diameter, volume, and mass, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that when using our software an increase in mass of 30 % can be regarded as significant growth. KEY POINTS: • Recently, recommendations regarding subsolid nodules have stressed the importance of growth quantification. • Volumetric measurement of subsolid nodules is feasible with good interscan agreement. • Increase of mass of 30 % can be regarded as significant growth.
Authors: Chang Min Park; Jin Mo Goo; Hyun Ju Lee; Kwang Gi Kim; Mi-Jin Kang; Yong Hwan Shin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: David M Hansell; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Theresa C McLoud; Nestor L Müller; Jacques Remy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ernst Th Scholten; Colin Jacobs; Bram van Ginneken; Martin J Willemink; Jan-Martin Kuhnigk; Peter M A van Ooijen; Matthijs Oudkerk; Willem P Th M Mali; Pim A de Jong Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Rosna Mirtcheva; Georgeann McGuinness; Dorothy McCauley; Olli S Miettinen Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Rob J van Klaveren; Matthijs Oudkerk; Mathias Prokop; Ernst T Scholten; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Rene Vernhout; Carola A van Iersel; Karien A M van den Bergh; Susan van 't Westeinde; Carlijn van der Aalst; Erik Thunnissen; Dong Ming Xu; Ying Wang; Yingru Zhao; Hester A Gietema; Bart-Jan de Hoop; Harry J M Groen; Geertruida H de Bock; Peter van Ooijen; Carla Weenink; Johny Verschakelen; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Wim Timens; Dik Willebrand; Aryan Vink; Willem Mali; Harry J de Koning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David P Naidich; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Massimo Pistolesi; Jin Mo Goo; Paolo Macchiarini; James D Crapo; Christian J Herold; John H Austin; William D Travis Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Sungmin Woo; Sang Min Lee; Hyun-Ju Lee; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Jin Mo Goo Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ernst Th Scholten; Bartjan de Hoop; Colin Jacobs; Saskia van Amelsvoort-van de Vorst; Rob J van Klaveren; Matthijs Oudkerk; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Harry J de Koning; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Willem Th M Mali; Hester A Gietema; Mathias Prokop; Bram van Ginneken; Pim A de Jong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julien G Cohen; Hyungjin Kim; Su Bin Park; Bram van Ginneken; Gilbert R Ferretti; Chang Hyun Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Min Park Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marios A Gavrielides; Benjamin P Berman; Mark Supanich; Kurt Schultz; Qin Li; Nicholas Petrick; Rongping Zeng; Jenifer Siegelman Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2017-12
Authors: Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Yong Sub Song; Leonard Sunwoo; Ye Ra Choi; Jung Im Kim; Jae Hyun Kim; Jae Seok Bae; Jong Hyuk Lee; Jin Mo Goo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Çiğdem Öztürk; Ton Velleman; Alphons H H Bongaerts; L M Bergman; Robert J van Ginkel; Jourik A Gietema; Harald J Hoekstra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Onno M Mets; Pim A de Jong; Ernst Th Scholten; Kaman Chung; Bram van Ginneken; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Judith E Spiro; Miriam Rinneburger; Dennis M Hedderich; Mladen Jokic; Hans Christian Reinhardt; David Maintz; Moritz Palmowski; Thorsten Persigehl Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2020-05-13