Literature DB >> 25412945

Gastrointestinal and renal side effects of bisphosphonates: differentiating between no proof of difference and proof of no difference.

V Fadda1, D Maratea1, S Trippoli1, A Messori2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at comparing the safety of bisphosphonates in women with osteoporosis by application of equivalence testing.
METHODS: Gastrointestinal and renal side effects were evaluated based on information published in randomized controlled trials.
RESULTS: The data on gastrointestinal side effects (47 trials) indicated that alendronate, risedronate etidronate, and zolendronate have similar rates of the adverse effects; application of Bayesian network meta-analysis showed that equivalence was demonstrated according to margins around ±10%. The data on renal safety were more sparse and suffered from the use of different outcome measures; hence, a single trial could be evaluated. This trial showed a similar effect of alendronate and risedronate on renal function at 12 months; equivalence was based on differences between the two agents in renal function with margins of less than ±10.4 ml/min.
CONCLUSION: Our study provided quantitative information to determine to what extent bisphosphonates can be considered equivalent in terms of gastrointestinal and renal side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisphosphonates; Equivalence; Osteoporosis; Safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412945     DOI: 10.1007/s40618-014-0211-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  17 in total

1.  Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Statistical issues and recommendations for noninferiority trials in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shiro Tanaka; Yousuke Kinjo; Yoshiki Kataoka; Kenichi Yoshimura; Satoshi Teramukai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Equivalence and noninferiority testing in anesthesiology research.

Authors:  Edward J Mascha
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing.

Authors:  Esteban Walker; Amy S Nowacki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Sample size calculations: should the emperor's clothes be off the peg or made to measure?

Authors:  Geoffrey Norman; Sandra Monteiro; Suzette Salama
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-08-23

6.  How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research.

Authors:  Soyeon Ahn; Seong Ho Park; Kyoung Ho Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Anti-reabsorptive agents in women with osteoporosis: determining statistical equivalence according to evidence-based methods.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Valeria Fadda; Dario Maratea; Sabrina Trippoli; Claudio Marinai
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 8.  Renal safety in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Sophie A Jamal; Pieter Evenepoel; Richard Eastell; Steven Boonen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The effect of alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene on renal functions, based on the Cockcroft and Gault method, in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Burcu Yanik; Nükhet Bavbek; Tuğra Yanik; Ilknur Inegöl; Mehmet Kanbay; Faruk Hilmi Turgut; Ebru Uz; Ali Akçay
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.606

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture® Best Practice Framework tool.

Authors:  M K Javaid; C Kyer; P J Mitchell; J Chana; C Moss; M H Edwards; A R McLellan; J Stenmark; D D Pierroz; M C Schneider; J A Kanis; K Akesson; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Qianggu capsule for the treatment of primary osteoporosis: evidence from a Chinese patent medicine.

Authors:  Xu Wei; Aili Xu; Hao Shen; Yanming Xie
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.659

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.