Literature DB >> 25412885

An open source automatic quality assurance (OSAQA) tool for the ACR MRI phantom.

Jidi Sun1, Michael Barnes, Jason Dowling, Fred Menk, Peter Stanwell, Peter B Greer.   

Abstract

Routine quality assurance (QA) is necessary and essential to ensure MR scanner performance. This includes geometric distortion, slice positioning and thickness accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution, intensity uniformity, ghosting artefact and low contrast object detectability. However, this manual process can be very time consuming. This paper describes the development and validation of an open source tool to automate the MR QA process, which aims to increase physicist efficiency, and improve the consistency of QA results by reducing human error. The OSAQA software was developed in Matlab and the source code is available for download from http://jidisun.wix.com/osaqa-project/. During program execution QA results are logged for immediate review and are also exported to a spreadsheet for long-term machine performance reporting. For the automatic contrast QA test, a user specific contrast evaluation was designed to improve accuracy for individuals on different display monitors. American College of Radiology QA images were acquired over a period of 2 months to compare manual QA and the results from the proposed OSAQA software. OSAQA was found to significantly reduce the QA time from approximately 45 to 2 min. Both the manual and OSAQA results were found to agree with regard to the recommended criteria and the differences were insignificant compared to the criteria. The intensity homogeneity filter is necessary to obtain an image with acceptable quality and at the same time keeps the high contrast spatial resolution within the recommended criterion. The OSAQA tool has been validated on scanners with different field strengths and manufacturers. A number of suggestions have been made to improve both the phantom design and QA protocol in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412885     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-014-0311-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  6 in total

1.  An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance.

Authors:  Juha I Peltonen; Teemu Mäkelä; Alexey Sofiev; Eero Salli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  MRI Safety Practice Observations in MRI Facilities Within the Kingdom of Jordan, Compared to the 2020 Manual on MR Safety of the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Mohammad Ayasrah
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Jonathan J Wyatt; Hazel M McCallum; Ross J Maxwell
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Quantitative MRI Harmonization to Maximize Clinical Impact: The RIN-Neuroimaging Network.

Authors:  Anna Nigri; Stefania Ferraro; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Michela Tosetti; Alberto Redolfi; Gianluigi Forloni; Egidio D'Angelo; Domenico Aquino; Laura Biagi; Paolo Bosco; Irene Carne; Silvia De Francesco; Greta Demichelis; Ruben Gianeri; Maria Marcella Lagana; Edoardo Micotti; Antonio Napolitano; Fulvia Palesi; Alice Pirastru; Giovanni Savini; Elisa Alberici; Carmelo Amato; Filippo Arrigoni; Francesca Baglio; Marco Bozzali; Antonella Castellano; Carlo Cavaliere; Valeria Elisa Contarino; Giulio Ferrazzi; Simona Gaudino; Silvia Marino; Vittorio Manzo; Luigi Pavone; Letterio S Politi; Luca Roccatagliata; Elisa Rognone; Andrea Rossi; Caterina Tonon; Raffaele Lodi; Fabrizio Tagliavini; Maria Grazia Bruzzone
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Quantitative analysis of image quality for acceptance and commissioning of an MRI simulator with a semiautomatic method.

Authors:  Xinyuan Chen; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Improvement in MR quality control workflow and outcomes with a web-based database.

Authors:  Xiangyu Yang; Kevin Little; Xia Jiang; David Hintenlang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.