Literature DB >> 25412388

Prostate cancer collaborative stage data items--their definitions, quality, usage, and clinical implications: a review of SEER data for 2004-2010.

Maria J Schymura1, Leon Sun, Antoinette Percy-Laurry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Version 2 of the Collaborative Stage Data Collection System (CSv2) became effective with cases diagnosed in 2010. This report focuses on the CSv2 components required to derive the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage for prostate cancer and on the site-specific factors for prostate cancer captured in CSv2. The report also highlights differences between the AJCC 6th and 7th editions for classifying prostate cancer stage.
METHODS: Data from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program population-based registries (SEER-18) were analyzed for the years 2004-2010, which included 400,591 prostate cancer cases.
RESULTS: CSv2 provides specificity with regard to the Gleason grading system by distinguishing between clinical and pathologic patterns and scores. The AJCC 7th edition incorporates prostate-specific antigen values into staging, subdivides stage II into IIA and IIB, and reclassifies extraprostatic invasion with microscopic bladder neck invasion from T4 in the 6th edition to T3a; this latter change affected the AJCC stage of 283 cases in 2010. Of the 44,578 prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2010 that would have been classified as stage II in the AJCC 6th edition, 32.7%, 27.5%, and 39.8% are classified as stages I, IIA, and IIB, respectively, in the 7th edition.
CONCLUSIONS: CSv2 provides more information than was previously available to researchers using SEER prostate data. The absence of a clearly defined clinical stage for each prostate case is the overriding limitation that researchers face in relying on Collaborative Stage information to analyze prostate cancer data.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Joint Committee on Cancer staging; Gleason score; TNM stage; collaborative stage; prognosis; prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412388     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Control and Survival after Robot-Assisted versus Open Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Padraic O'Malley; Bilal Chughtai; Abby Isaacs; Jialin Mao; Jason D Wright; Dawn Hershman; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Contributions of Social Factors to Disparities in Prostate Cancer Risk Profiles among Black Men and Non-Hispanic White Men with Prostate Cancer in California.

Authors:  David J Press; Salma Shariff-Marco; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Diane Lauderdale; Adam B Murphy; Pushkar P Inamdar; Mindy C DeRouen; Ann S Hamilton; Juan Yang; Katherine Lin; Donald Hedeker; Christopher A Haiman; Iona Cheng; Scarlett Lin Gomez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Cancer-Specific Survival and Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Zhang; Chenghao Zhanghuang; Jinkui Wang; Xiaomao Tian; Xin Wu; Maoxian Li; Tao Mi; Jiayan Liu; Liming Jin; Mujie Li; Dawei He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yang Xiong; Yangchang Zhang; Fuxun Zhang; Changjing Wu; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in prostate cancer patients with different site-specific visceral metastases: A study of 1358 patients.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Cui; Xiao-Feng Cong; Feng Gao; Jia-Xin Yin; Zi-Ru Niu; Song-Chen Zhao; Zi-Ling Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system among prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-08

7.  Racial differences in prostate cancer risk in young HIV-positive and HIV-negative men: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anupriya Dutta; Hajime Uno; Alex Holman; David R Lorenz; Dana Gabuzda
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.532

8.  Brachytherapy boost and cancer-specific mortality in favorable high-risk versus other high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vinayak Muralidhar; Michael Xiang; Peter F Orio; Neil E Martin; Clair J Beard; Felix Y Feng; Karen E Hoffman; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-02-29

9.  Prostate cancer patients may have an increased risk of coexisting advanced colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Sun-Hye Ko; Myong Ki Baeg; Woong Jin Bae; Pumsoo Kim; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Risk of skeletal related events among elderly prostate cancer patients by site of metastasis at diagnosis.

Authors:  Arif Hussain; Abdalla Aly; C Daniel Mullins; Yi Qian; Jorge Arellano; Eberechukwu Onukwugha
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.