Literature DB >> 25411904

Comparison of pediatric and adult hospice patients using electronic medical record data from nine hospices in the United States, 2008-2012.

Laura Dingfield1, Laura Bender, Pamela Harris, Kristina Newport, Margo Hoover-Regan, Chris Feudtner, Sheila Clifford, David Casarett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric hospice patients receive services from agencies typically oriented to adults. Information regarding how pediatric hospice patients differ from adult hospice patients is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to assess differences between pediatric and adult hospice patients regarding patient characteristics and outcomes.
METHODS: We compiled a retrospective inception cohort of patients enrolled at nine hospices in the CHOICE network (Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness) between August 1, 2008 and June 30, 2012. Measurements included patient characteristics and outcomes, including discharge from hospice and site of death.
RESULTS: Among 126,620 hospice patients, 986 (0.8%) were 18 years of age or younger. Pediatric patients were less likely to have an admitting diagnosis of cancer (odds ratio [OR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.72). Although children were less likely to use oxygen at enrollment (OR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.26-0.37), they were more likely to have an enteral feeding tube (OR 4.04; 95% CI: 3.49-4.67). Pediatric patients were half as likely as adults to have a do-not-resuscitate order (DNR) order upon hospice enrollment (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.46-0.59). The average hospice length of stay for pediatric patients was longer than that of adults (103 days versus 66 days, p<0.001). Children were more likely to leave hospice care (OR 2.59; 95% CI: 2.00-3.34), but among patients who died while enrolled in hospice, pediatric patients were more likely to die at home (OR 3.25; 95% CI: 2.27-3.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospice patients differ from adult patients in their broader range of underlying diagnoses and their use of hospice services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411904     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric palliative care in the intensive care unit and questions of quality: a review of the determinants and mechanisms of high-quality palliative care in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Authors:  Sara Rhodes Short; Rachel Thienprayoon
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-10

2.  Defining Provider-Prioritized Domains of Quality in Pediatric Home-Based Hospice and Palliative Care: A Study of the Ohio Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Network.

Authors:  Rachel Thienprayoon; Evaline Alessandrini; Millicent Frimpong-Manso; Daniel Grossoehme
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Hospitalizations for mitochondrial disease across the lifespan in the U.S.

Authors:  Shana E McCormack; Rui Xiao; Todd J Kilbaugh; Michael Karlsson; Rebecca D Ganetzky; Zarazuela Zolkipli Cunningham; Amy Goldstein; Marni J Falk; Scott M Damrauer
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.797

4.  Provider-Prioritized Domains of Quality in Pediatric Home-Based Hospice and Palliative Care: A Study of the Ohio Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Network.

Authors:  Rachel Thienprayoon; Melissa San Julian Mark; Daniel Grossoehme
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Geographic Variation in California Pediatric Hospice Care for Children and Adolescents: 2007-2010.

Authors:  Lisa C Lindley; Sheri L Edwards
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  COMPLETE (Communication Plan Early Through End of Life): Development of a Research Program to Diminish Suffering for Children at End of Life.

Authors:  Verna Hendricks-Ferguson; Amy R Newman; Katharine E Brock; Joan E Haase; Jennifer L Raybin; Shermini Saini; Karen M Moody
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.145

7.  Charting a path to high-quality end-of-life care for children with cancer.

Authors:  Prasanna Ananth; Joanne Wolfe; Emily E Johnston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 8.  A systematic concept analysis of 'technology dependent': challenging the terminology.

Authors:  Maria Brenner; Denise Alexander; Mary Brigid Quirke; Jessica Eustace-Cook; Piet Leroy; Jay Berry; Martina Healy; Carmel Doyle; Kate Masterson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberta I Jordan; Matthew J Allsop; Yousuf ElMokhallalati; Catriona E Jackson; Helen L Edwards; Emma J Chapman; Luc Deliens; Michael I Bennett
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.