| Literature DB >> 25411628 |
Fukashi Ishibashi1, Rie Kojima1, Asami Kawasaki1, Emi Yamanaka1, Aiko Kosaka1, Harumi Uetake1.
Abstract
AIMS/Entities:
Keywords: Sudomotor function; Sweat gland duct; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2013 PMID: 25411628 PMCID: PMC4188118 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Clinical characteristics of control participants and type 2 diabetic patients with or without staged severity of diabetic neuropathy
| Control participants | Stage of diabetic neuropathy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I | Stage II | Stage III | Stage IV+V | ||
| 28 (17/11) | 23 (15/8) | 28 (15/13) | 20 (12/8) | 7 (3/4) | |
| Age (years) | 50.2 ± 1.4 | 48.1 ± 2.2 | 55.7 ± 1.5# | 54.8 ± 2.2 | 58.7 ± 2.2 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.9 ± 0.6 | 25.1 ± 0.9 | 25.3 ± 0.6 | 25.6 ± 1.1 | 22.3 ± 0.9 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 134.6 ± 8.5 | 141.3 ± 5.2 | 143.7 ± 3.2 | 147.4 ± 5.1 | 159.7 ± 11.4 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.8 ± 3.6 | 83.7 ± 1.9 | 85.2 ± 1.1 | 85.9 ± 1.9 | 89.7 ± 4.5 |
| No. treated with ARB/ACEI (%) | 1 (3.6) | 7 (30.4) | 11 (39.3)* | 10 (50.0)** | 4 (57.1)* |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.6 ± 0.05 | 7.7 ± 0.44*** | 7.5 ± 0.27*** | 8.3 ± 0.44*** | 8.3 ± 0.53** |
| Uric acid (mmol/L) | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.03 |
| LDL‐C (mmol/L) | 3.29 ± 0.16 | 3.41 ± 0.22 | 3.39 ± 0.15 | 3.31 ± 0.21 | 3.02 ± 0.16 |
| No. treated with statins (%) | 2 (7.1) | 3 (13.0) | 6 (21.4) | 4 (20.0) | 1 (14.3) |
| HDL‐C (mmol/L) | 1.78 ± 0.097 | 1.47 ± 0.10 | 1.38 ± 0.079* | 1.43 ± 0.082 | 1.79 ± 0.12 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.49 ± 0.20 | 1.93 ± 0.30 | 2.69 ± 0.59 | 2.64 ± 1.16 | 1.53 ± 0.30 |
| ACR (mg/gCr) | 8.5 ± 2.1 | 39.5 ± 16.0 | 31.3 ± 8.4 | 168.6 ± 105.7 | 168.8 ± 100.4 |
| eGFR (mL/min) | 81.9 ± 2.4 | 83.0 ± 4.0 | 80.7 ± 2.5 | 86.8 ± 4.1 | 96.9 ± 7.5 |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 8.5 ± 1.0 | 9.9 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 3.7 | |
Data are the mean ± standard error of the mean in control participants and type 2 diabetic patients with or without diabetic neuropathy stratified by the criteria of Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan12. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001 compared with control participants, #P < 0.05 compared with type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic neuropathy stage I. Statistical analyses were carried out with analysis of variance for continuous variables, and with χ2‐test with Bonferroni correction for categorical variables. To standardize glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values to National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program units, 0.4% was added to the measured HbA1c values16. ACEI, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ACR, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Comparison of neurophysiological examinations among control participants and type 2 diabetic patients with or without stratified diabetic neuropathy
| Control participants | Stage of diabetic neuropathy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I | Stage II | Stage III | Stage IV+V | ||
| MCV (m/s) | 57.8 ± 0.7### | 56.0 ± 1.0## | 53.9 ± 1.3# | 52.5 ± 1.4 | 46.7 ± 3.8 |
| SCV (m/s) | 63.6 ± 0.7## | 62.5 ± 0.7# | 60.5 ± 1.0 | 59.4 ± 0.8 | 54.9 ± 2.4 |
| VPT (μ/120c/s) | 1.7 ± 0.19# | 2.1 ± 0.31# | 3.4 ± 0.53 | 3.2 ± 0.44 | 4.5 ± 0.61 |
| CPT‐2000 Hz | 226.3 ± 12.9### | 225.5 ± 10.8### | 254.7 ± 16.1## | 357.1 ± 33.8$$,&&& | 426.7 ± 67.5 |
| CPT‐250 Hz | 95.6 ± 6.2### | 95.8 ± 4.5### | 102.3 ± 7.3## | 147.8 ± 12.8$$,&&& | 166.3 ± 20.4 |
| CPT‐5 Hz | 50.3 ± 3.5# | 53.2 ± 4.9# | 54.0 ± 5.6# | 84.1 ± 10.0$$,&& | 89.4 ± 6.5 |
| Warm PT (w/m2) | −594 ± 39.8### | −605 ± 26.5### | −580 ± 30.7### | −659 ± 37.9### | −1028 ± 189 |
| Cold PT (w/m2) | 473 ± 42.8 | 524 ± 26.5 | 563 ± 20.7 | 628 ± 54.2 | 664 ± 62.5 |
| CVR‐R (%) | 3.32 ± 0.19# | 3.50 ± 0.18## | 3.20 ± 0.28 | 3.01 ± 0.25& | 1.85 ± 0.27 |
Data are mean ± standard error of the mean in control participants and type 2 diabetic patients with or without diabetic neuropathy stratified by the criteria of Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan12. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 compared with stage IV + V, $$P < 0.01 compared with stage II, &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01, &&&P < 0.001 compared with stage I. CPT, current perception threshold; CV, coefficient of variation; MCV, motor neuron conduction velocity; PT, perception threshold; SCV, sensory neuron conduction velocity; VPT, vibration perception threshold.
Comparison of morphological parameters of corneal nerve plexus observed by corneal confocal microscopy between control participants and type 2 diabetic patients with or without stratified severity of diabetic neuropathy
| Control participants | Stage of diabetic neuropathy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I | Stage II | Stage III | Stage IV+V | ||
| Corneal nerve fiber density (/mm2) | 33.1 ± 0.85 | 27.3 ± 0.78**,## | 25.4 ± 1.4***,# | 24.2 ± 1.5*** | 17.7 ± 2.8*** |
| Corneal nerve fiber length (mm/mm2) | 14.2 ± 0.94 | 10.2 ± 0.3**,## | 9.4 ± 0.4***,# | 9.2 ± 0.43***,# | 7.1 ± 1.1*** |
| Corneal nerve branch density (/mm2) | 14.2 ± 0.99## | 13.1 ± 1.25# | 12.7 ± 1.1# | 10.8 ± 1.0 | 6.1 ± 2.1 |
| Corneal nerve branch length (mm/mm2) | 3.28 ± 0.34## | 2.45 ± 0.20# | 2.43 ± 0.19 | 2.39 ± 0.20 | 1.28 ± 0.42 |
| Tortuosity grade | 2.03 ± 0.08 | 2.66 ± 0.06*** | 2.59 ± 0.06*** | 2.80 ± 0.10*** | 2.50 ± 0.37** |
| Beading frequency (/0.1 mm) | 24.9 ± 0.52 | 19.6 ± 0.48*** | 20.1 ± 0.60*** | 19.5 ± 0.47*** | 20.0 ± 1.60** |
Data are mean ± standard error of the mean in control participants and type 2 diabetic patients with or without diabetic neuropathy stratified by the criteria of Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan12. **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001 compared with control participants, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with stage IV+V. Statistical analysis was carried out with analysis of valiance.
Figure 1(a) Confocal microscopic image of sweat gland duct in the epidermis of the finger pad in a 41‐year‐old healthy participant with normal neurophysiological examinations and normal parameters of the corneal nerve plexus by confocal microscopy. (b) Sweat gland duct of a 46‐year‐old patient with type 2 diabetes who did not have diabetic neuropathy with abnormal morphological parameters of corneal nerve plexus. A smaller sweat gland duct than the control participant was seen.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves establishing cut‐off levels between controls and type 2 diabetic patients for the period until complete color change of the Neuropad and the cross‐sectional area of sweat gland ducts visualized by confocal microscopy of the epidermis of the finger pad. The cross‐sectional area of the sweat gland duct was analyzed using Photoshop Elements 8.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Simple PCI (Compix Inc., Cranberry Township, PA, USA) after smoothing and enlarging five times by PhotoZoom Pro4 (BenVista Ltd., Houston, TX, USA).
Figure 3Comparison of (a) period for complete color change of the Neuropad and (b) cross‐sectional area of sweat gland duct in the epidermis of the finger pad among controls and type 2 diabetic patients with stratified diabetic neuropathy (DN) defined by a criteria of Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan12. The sweat gland ducts in the epidermis of the finger pad were visualized by confocal microscopy and analyzed by Photoshop Elements 8.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Simple PCI (Compix Inc., Cranberry Township, PA, USA) after smoothing and enlarging five times by PhotoZoom Pro4 (BenVista Ltd., Houston, TX, USA). The significance of difference between groups was determined by analysis of variance. *P < 0.0001 compared with control participants.
Correlation between period of complete color change of Neuropad or cross‐sectional area of sweat gland duct and neurophysiological examinations in patients with type 2 diabetes
| Period of CCC for Neuropad | CSA of sweat gland duct | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β |
| β |
| |
| MCV (m/s) | −0.241 | 0.034 | 0.275 | 0.022 |
| SCV (m/s) | −0.227 | 0.060 | 0.087 | 0.485 |
| VPT (μ/120c/s) | 0.198 | 0.105 | −0.133 | 0.328 |
| CPT‐2000 Hz (mV) | 0.192 | 0.092 | −0.236 | 0.051 |
| CPT‐250 Hz (mV) | 0.158 | 0.163 | −0.178 | 0.138 |
| CPT‐5 Hz (mV) | 0.107 | 0.337 | −0.079 | 0.504 |
| Warm perception threshold (w/m2) | −0.252 | 0.031 | 0.240 | 0.055 |
| Cold perception threshold (w/m2) | 0.118 | 0.358 | −0.116 | 0.391 |
| CVR‐R (%) | −0.407 | <0.0001 | 0.100 | 0.428 |
CCC, complete color change; CPT, current perception threshold; CSA, cross‐sectional area; CV, coefficient of variation; MCV, motor neuron conduction velocity; SCV, sensory neuron conduction velocity; VPT, vibration perception threshold.
Correlation between period until complete color change of Neuropad or cross sectional area of sweat gland duct and clinical factors or morphology of corneal nerve plexus in patients with type 2 diabetes
| Period for CCC of Neuropad | CSA of sweat gland duct | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β |
| β |
| |
| Sex | 0.207 | 0.073 | 0.032 | 0.776 |
| Age | 0.104 | 0.401 | −0.048 | 0.706 |
| BMI | −0.070 | 0.565 | 0.140 | 0.266 |
| Duration of diabetes | 0.091 | 0.422 | 0.147 | 0.209 |
| SBP | −0.019 | 0.924 | 0.151 | 0.208 |
| DBP | 0.203 | 0.173 | 0.076 | 0.631 |
| HbA1c | 0.137 | 0.296 | −0.183 | 0.175 |
| ACR | 0.188 | 0.191 | −0.051 | 0.679 |
| Triglycerides | −0.107 | 0.354 | 0.294 | 0.015 |
| Uric acid | −0.077 | 0.601 | 0.386 | 0.009 |
| Corneal nerve fiber density | −0.422 | <0.0001 | 0.011 | 0.926 |
| Corneal nerve fiber length | −0.386 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.992 |
| Corneal nerve branch density | −0.296 | 0.004 | 0.277 | 0.021 |
| Corneal nerve branch length | −0.278 | 0.009 | 0.265 | 0.027 |
| Tortuosity grade | −0.187 | 0.196 | −0.029 | 0.800 |
| Beading frequency | 0.079 | 0.492 | −0.174 | 0.142 |
| Stage of diabetic neuropathy | 0.541 | <0.0001 | −0.290 | 0.021 |
| CSA of sweat gland duct | −0.266 | 0.028 | ||
Stage of diabetic neuropathy was defined by the criteria of Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan12. ACR, albumin creatinine ratio; BMI, body mass index; CSA, cross‐sectional area; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; SBP, systolic blood pressure.