Literature DB >> 25411490

Learning to minimize efforts versus maximizing rewards: computational principles and neural correlates.

Vasilisa Skvortsova1, Stefano Palminteri2, Mathias Pessiglione3.   

Abstract

The mechanisms of reward maximization have been extensively studied at both the computational and neural levels. By contrast, little is known about how the brain learns to choose the options that minimize action cost. In principle, the brain could have evolved a general mechanism that applies the same learning rule to the different dimensions of choice options. To test this hypothesis, we scanned healthy human volunteers while they performed a probabilistic instrumental learning task that varied in both the physical effort and the monetary outcome associated with choice options. Behavioral data showed that the same computational rule, using prediction errors to update expectations, could account for both reward maximization and effort minimization. However, these learning-related variables were encoded in partially dissociable brain areas. In line with previous findings, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex was found to positively represent expected and actual rewards, regardless of effort. A separate network, encompassing the anterior insula, the dorsal anterior cingulate, and the posterior parietal cortex, correlated positively with expected and actual efforts. These findings suggest that the same computational rule is applied by distinct brain systems, depending on the choice dimension-cost or benefit-that has to be learned.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3415621-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational modeling; effort; reinforcement learning; reward; ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411490      PMCID: PMC6608437          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1350-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

1.  Associability-modulated loss learning is increased in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Vanessa M Brown; Lusha Zhu; John M Wang; B Christopher Frueh; Brooks King-Casas; Pearl H Chiu
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Effort cost computation in schizophrenia: a commentary on the recent literature.

Authors:  James M Gold; James A Waltz; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  The good, the bad and the brain: Neural correlates of appetitive and aversive values underlying decision making.

Authors:  Mathias Pessiglione; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-08-24

4.  Separate mesocortical and mesolimbic pathways encode effort and reward learning signals.

Authors:  Tobias U Hauser; Eran Eldar; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Optimizing sequential decisions in the drift-diffusion model.

Authors:  Khanh P Nguyen; Krešimir Josić; Zachary P Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Modulation of ventral striatal activity by cognitive effort.

Authors:  Ekaterina Dobryakova; Ryan K Jessup; Elizabeth Tricomi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Receipt of reward leads to altered estimation of effort.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Aurel Wannig; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Behavioral and Neural Evidence of the Rewarding Value of Exercise Behaviors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Boris Cheval; Rémi Radel; Jason L Neva; Lara A Boyd; Stephan P Swinnen; David Sander; Matthieu P Boisgontier
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  The Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort is Encoded by a Domain-General Valuation Network.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Bidhan Lamichhane; Todd Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dopamine Manipulation Affects Response Vigor Independently of Opportunity Cost.

Authors:  Alexandre Zénon; Sophie Devesse; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.