Literature DB >> 25410175

Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices.

Alberto Domínguez-Vicent1, Daniel Monsálvez-Romín1, Antonio Jesus Del Aguila-Carrasco1, Santiago García-Lázaro1, Robert Montés-Micó1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the ocular anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, as measured with two different Scheimpflug imaging devices.
METHODS: This transversal study included 80 right eyes from 80 subjects aged from 20 to 40 years. Their spherical equivalents ranged from -4.25 to +1.00 diopters (D). Each eye's anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, were measured for far vision using both the Galilei G4 (double Scheimpflug camera) and the Pentacam HR (single Scheimpflug camera) systems.
RESULTS: Mean anterior chamber depths were calculated as 3.12 ± 0.23 mm and 3.19 ± 0.24 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. The mean white-to-white distance measured was 11.84 ± 0.31 mm and 11.90 ± 0.43 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. Mean pupil diameters were measured as 3.22 ± 0.58 mm and 3.22 ± 0.52 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. Finally, the mean anterior chamber angle was 34.30 ± 2.86 degrees when it was measured with the Galilei G4, and 39.26 ± 2.85 degrees when measured with the Pentacam HR. A comparative analysis revealed that the Galilei G4 yielded a significantly lower (P<0.05) measurement for the anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, than the Pentacam HR system. Comparable values (P>0.05) for both devices were obtained for the white-to-white distance measurements.
CONCLUSION: The Galilei G4 and Pentacam HR Scheimpflug systems cannot be used interchangeably because they produce significant measurement differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25410175     DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol        ISSN: 0004-2749            Impact factor:   0.872


  4 in total

Review 1.  Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Cari Pérez-Vives; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Santiago García-Lázaro; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters and Axial Length Using Two Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers.

Authors:  Chantaka Supiyaphun; Sasivimol Rattanasiri; Passara Jongkhajornpong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-23

3.  Comparison between Two Scheimpflug Anterior Segment Analyzers.

Authors:  Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Tahmineh Motevasseli; Forouzan Yazdizadeh; Farid Karimian; Sahba Fekri; Amir Baradaran-Rafii
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

4.  Comparison of Anterior Corneal Aberrometry, Keratometry and Pupil Size with Scheimpflug Tomography and Ray Tracing Aberrometer.

Authors:  Zahra Ashena; Sean Gallagher; Hasan Naveed; David J Spalton; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.