Literature DB >> 25406305

Regional variation in patients and outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial.

Marc A Pfeffer1, Brian Claggett2, Susan F Assmann2, Robin Boineau2, Inder S Anand2, Nadine Clausell2, Akshay S Desai2, Rafael Diaz2, Jerome L Fleg2, Ivan Gordeev2, John F Heitner2, Eldrin F Lewis2, Eileen O'Meara2, Jean-Lucien Rouleau2, Jeffrey L Probstfield2, Tamaz Shaburishvili2, Sanjiv J Shah2, Scott D Solomon2, Nancy K Sweitzer2, Sonja M McKinlay2, Bertram Pitt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction assigned to spironolactone did not achieve a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome (time to cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for management of heart failure) compared with patients receiving placebo. In a post hoc analysis, an ≈4-fold difference was identified in this composite event rate between the 1678 patients randomized from Russia and Georgia compared with the 1767 enrolled from the United States, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina (the Americas). METHODS AND
RESULTS: To better understand this regional difference in clinical outcomes, demographic characteristics of these populations and their responses to spironolactone were explored. Patients from Russia/Georgia were younger, had less atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus, but were more likely to have had prior myocardial infarction or a hospitalization for heart failure. Russia/Georgia patients also had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and creatinine but higher diastolic blood pressure (all P<0.001). Hyperkalemia and doubling of creatinine were more likely and hypokalemia was less likely in patients receiving spironolactone in the Americas with no significant treatment effects in Russia/Georgia. All clinical event rates were markedly lower in Russia/Georgia, and there was no detectable impact of spironolactone on any outcomes. In contrast, in the Americas, the rates of the primary outcome, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure were significantly reduced by spironolactone.
CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated greater potassium and creatinine changes and possible clinical benefits with spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from the Americas. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00094302.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; randomized controlled trials; spironolactone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25406305     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  226 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease: an Update.

Authors:  Mandar A Aras; Mitchell A Psotka; Teresa De Marco
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Differential Clinical Profiles, Exercise Responses, and Outcomes Associated With Existing HFpEF Definitions.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ho; Emily K Zern; Luke Wooster; Cole S Bailey; Thomas Cunningham; Aaron S Eisman; Kathryn M Hardin; Giovanna A Zampierollo; Petr Jarolim; Paul P Pappagianopoulos; Rajeev Malhotra; Matthew Nayor; Gregory D Lewis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Prognostic Significance of Low Systolic Blood Pressure at Discharge in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Shijun Li; Xiaoying Li
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Heart failure management in dialysis patients: Many treatment options with no clear evidence.

Authors:  Bethany Roehm; Gaurav Gulati; Daniel E Weiner
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 6.  Addressing the Heterogeneity of Heart Failure in Future Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Annamaria Iorio; Andrea Pozzi; Michele Senni
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  Updates in heart failure 30-day readmission prevention.

Authors:  David Goldgrab; Kathir Balakumaran; Min Jung Kim; Sara R Tabtabai
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Rationale and Design of the ATHENA-HF Trial: Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined With Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Javed Butler; Adrian F Hernandez; Kevin J Anstrom; Andreas Kalogeropoulos; Margaret M Redfield; Marvin A Konstam; W H Wilson Tang; G Michael Felker; Monica R Shah; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 12.035

9.  A Survey of Challenges and Opportunities in Sensing and Analytics for Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disorders.

Authors:  Nathan C Hurley; Erica S Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Roozbeh Jafari; Bobak J Mortazavi
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Healthc       Date:  2020-12-30

10.  Association of Natriuretic Peptides With Cardiovascular Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Secondary Analysis of the TOPCAT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peder Langeland Myhre; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Brian L Claggett; Inder S Anand; Nancy K Sweitzer; James C Fang; Eileen O'Meara; Sanjiv J Shah; Akshay S Desai; Eldrin F Lewis; Jean Rouleau; Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.