| Literature DB >> 25405213 |
Abstract
The biosorption performance of raw cone shell of Calabrian pine for C.I. Basic Red 46 as a model azo dye from aqueous system was optimized using Taguchi experimental design methodology. L9 (3(3)) orthogonal array was used to optimize the dye biosorption by the pine cone shell. The selected factors and their levels were biosorbent particle size, dye concentration, and contact time. The predicted dye biosorption capacity for the pine cone shell from Taguchi design was obtained as 71.770 mg g(-1) under optimized biosorption conditions. This experimental design provided reasonable predictive performance of dye biosorption by the biosorbent (R (2): 0.9961). Langmuir model fitted better to the biosorption equilibrium data than Freundlich model. This displayed the monolayer coverage of dye molecules on the biosorbent surface. Dubinin-Radushkevich model and the standard Gibbs free energy change proposed physical biosorption for predominant mechanism. The logistic function presented the best fit to the data of biosorption kinetics. The kinetic parameters reflecting biosorption performance were also evaluated. The optimization study revealed that the pine cone shell can be an effective and economically feasible biosorbent for the removal of dye.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25405213 PMCID: PMC4227375 DOI: 10.1155/2014/138986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1FTIR spectrum of biosorbent material.
Figure 2SEM picture of pine cone shell.
Taguchi L9 (33) orthogonal array design.
| Experiment | Operating factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dye concentration | Biosorbent particle size | Contact time | |
| 1 | 40 | 63–125 | 30 |
| 2 | 40 | 125–250 | 75 |
| 3 | 40 | 250–500 | 120 |
| 4 | 60 | 63–125 | 75 |
| 5 | 60 | 125–250 | 120 |
| 6 | 60 | 250–500 | 30 |
| 7 | 100 | 63–125 | 120 |
| 8 | 100 | 125–250 | 30 |
| 9 | 100 | 250–500 | 75 |
Dye biosorption capacity and SN ratio value obtained for each experiment.
| Experiment | Mean response | |
|---|---|---|
| Dye biosorption capacity. | SN ratio | |
| 1 | 18.5075 | 25.2275 |
| 2 | 24.3769 | 28.1887 |
| 3 | 21.6554 | 26.1722 |
| 4 | 57.0611 | 34.9478 |
| 5 | 49.5265 | 33.6339 |
| 6 | 20.1080 | 26.5140 |
| 7 | 71.7701 | 37.5616 |
| 8 | 37.5385 | 31.1443 |
| 9 | 48.2210 | 33.4029 |
Biosorption efficiencies and SN ratio values obtained for all levels of factors.
| Factor | Level | Biosorption efficiency. | SN ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dye concentration (mg L−1) | 40 | 21.51 | 26.53 |
| 60 | 42.23 | 31.70 | |
| 100 | 52.51 | 34.04 | |
|
| |||
| Biosorbent particle size ( | 63–125 | 49.11 | 32.58 |
| 125–250 | 37.15 | 30.99 | |
| 250–500 | 29.99 | 28.70 | |
|
| |||
| Contact time (min) | 30 | 25.38 | 27.63 |
| 75 | 43.22 | 32.18 | |
| 120 | 47.65 | 32.46 | |
Figure 3Effect of each factor studied on biosorption of dye.
Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA).
| Factor | Degree of freedom | Sum of squares | Mean squares | Fischer ratio |
| Percent contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dye concentration | 2 | 1495.69 | 747.843 | 133.09 | 0.007 | 51.571 |
| Biosorbent particle size | 2 | 559.83 | 279.917 | 49.82 | 0.020 | 19.303 |
| Contact time | 2 | 833.50 | 416.748 | 74.17 | 0.013 | 28.739 |
| Error | 2 | 11.24 | 5.619 | 0.388 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Total | 8 | 2900.25 | ||||
Figure 4Comparison of experimental and Taguchi-predicted biosorption performance values.
Data of isotherm models for dye biosorption.
| Model | Equation | Parameter | Value |
| SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freundlich |
|
| 23.0384 | 0.6823 | 10.8889 |
|
| |||||
| Langmuir |
|
| 66.0207 | 0.9782 | 3.0842 |
|
| |||||
| Dubinin-Radushkevich |
|
| 69.5042 | 0.9654 | 3.5914 |
SD: standard deviation, K (mg g−1) (L mg−1)1/n: a constant related to biosorption capacity, n : a constant related to biosorption intensity, q (mg g−1): maximum monolayer biosorption capacity, b (L mg−1): a constant related to energy of biosorption, R : separation factor, q DR (mg g−1): maximum biosorption capacity, B DR (mol2 kJ−2): a constant related to mean free energy of biosorption, ε: Polanyi potential, and E (kJ mol−1): mean free energy.
Figure 5Plots for biosorption isotherm models.
Kinetic parameters of dye removal.
| Model | Equation | Parameter | Value |
| SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudo-first-order |
|
| 0.0378 | ||
|
| 67.7251 | 0.9827 | 2.5403 | ||
|
| 2.5580 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Pseudo-second-order |
|
| 0.0011 | ||
|
| 69.9680 | 0.9908 | 1.9973 | ||
|
| 5.3844 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Logistic |
|
| 66.7553 | ||
|
| 0.0605 | 0.9957 | 1.3725 | ||
|
| 19.9207 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Intraparticle diffusion |
|
| 5.93564 | 0.9431 | 4.6093 |
|
| 9.08756 | ||||
SD: standard deviation, k 1 (min−1), k 2 (g mg−1 min−1), and k (mg g−1 min−1/2): biosorption rate constants, h 1 and h 2 (mg g−1 min−1): initial biosorption rates, k (min−1): maximum relative biosorption rate, t (min): time t pointing center of q (q /2), and C (mg g−1): a constant providing information about thickness of boundary layer.
Figure 6Comparison of kinetic models for biosorption dynamics.
Dye biosorption performance data based on pseudo-second-order kinetics.
| Parameter | Symbol (unit) | Equation | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approaching equilibrium factor |
|
| 0.0977 |
| Second-order rate index |
|
| 0.0770 |
| Biosorption half-life |
|
| 12.9945 |
| Operating time |
|
| |
|
| 38.9835 | ||
|
| 73.6356 | ||
|
| 246.8958 |
t (min): longest operation time based on kinetic experiments, X: fractional biosorption value, and W: X/(1 − X).
Figure 7Design of single-stage batch system for dye biosorption.
Figure 8Required biosorbent amount (M) versus volume of dye solution treated (V).