Literature DB >> 25404785

Improving Written Communication Through Perspective-taking.

Matthew J Traxler1, Morton Ann Gernsbacher1.   

Abstract

To convey their ideas successfully, writers must envision how readers will interpret their texts. In our previous research (Traxler & Gernsbacher, 1992), we discovered that writers who received feedback from their readers successfully revised descriptions of geometric figures, whereas writers who did not receive feedback did not. We also discovered that writers who received feedback from their readers on one set of descriptions wrote better descriptions of a new set of geometric figures. We concluded that feedback-even a minimal form of feedback-helps writers learn to envision how readers will interpret their texts. In the present research, we investigated another way that writers can learn to envision how readers will interpret their texts. Our treatment placed writers "in their readers' shoes". In three experiments, half the writers performed a task that their readers would subsequently perform, and the other half of the writers performed a control task. In our first and second experiments, the writers who gained their readers' perspective by performing their readers' task successfully revised their descriptions of geometric figures, whereas writers who performed the control task did not. In our third experiment, we discovered that writers who performed their readers' task did not improve their descriptions merely because they were exposed to examples of other writers' descriptions. We concluded that gaining their readers' perspective helps writers communicate more clearly because perspective-taking helps writers form a mental representation of how readers interpret their texts.

Year:  1993        PMID: 25404785      PMCID: PMC4232969          DOI: 10.1080/01690969308406958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  2 in total

1.  Improving Written Communication Through Minimal Feedback.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  1992-02

2.  Referring as a collaborative process.

Authors:  H H Clark; D Wilkes-Gibbs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-02
  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  The role of animacy in spatial transformations.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  How Automatically Do Readers Infer Fictional Characters' Emotional States?

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Brenda M Hallada; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  1998-07

3.  Two Decades of Structure Building.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  1997-01

4.  Thinking about a reader's mind: fostering communicative clarity in the compositions of youth with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Michael Grossman; Joan Peskin; Valerie San Juan
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-10

5.  Comparing narrative writing of autistic and non-autistic College students.

Authors:  Sergey Shevchuk-Hill; Shana Szczupakiewicz; Bella Kofner; Kristen Gillespie-Lynch
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.