David Roife1, Ya'an Kang2, Li Wang3, Bingliang Fang3, Stephen G Swisher3, Jeffrey E Gershenwald2, Shanna Pretzsch4, Colin P Dinney4, Matthew H G Katz2, Jason B Fleming5. 1. Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: jbflemin@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts have recently become a powerful tool for cancer research and may be used to guide personalized therapy. Thus far, patient-derived xenografts have been grown from tumor tissue obtained after operative resection; however, many cancer patients never undergo operative intervention for a variety of reasons. We hypothesized that xenograft tumors could be grown from smaller volumes of patient tissue, such as those obtained during diagnostic biopsies. METHODS: Surgical specimens were obtained after resection of primary or metastatic lesions of the following cancers: pancreatic carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, bladder (urothelial) carcinoma, and melanoma. At least 10 cases of each cancer were included in this study. To mimic clinical biopsies, small fragments of the surgical specimens were biopsied with a 22-gauge needle, and the needle contents were injected subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice. The tumor fragment from which the biopsy was taken was also implanted subcutaneously in the contralateral side of the same mouse as a control. RESULTS: Success rates of the traditional method of xenograft implantation ranged from 27.3%-70%. Success rates of the fine needle aspirate technique ranged from 0%-36.4%. An attempt to engraft a percutaneous core needle liver biopsy of a metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma also was successful. CONCLUSION: We have found that it is possible to engraft fine needle aspirates and core biopsies of solid tumors in order to generate patient-derived xenografts. This may open up xenografting to a wider cancer patient population than previously possible.
BACKGROUND:Patient-derived xenografts have recently become a powerful tool for cancer research and may be used to guide personalized therapy. Thus far, patient-derived xenografts have been grown from tumor tissue obtained after operative resection; however, many cancerpatients never undergo operative intervention for a variety of reasons. We hypothesized that xenograft tumors could be grown from smaller volumes of patient tissue, such as those obtained during diagnostic biopsies. METHODS: Surgical specimens were obtained after resection of primary or metastatic lesions of the following cancers: pancreatic carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, bladder (urothelial) carcinoma, and melanoma. At least 10 cases of each cancer were included in this study. To mimic clinical biopsies, small fragments of the surgical specimens were biopsied with a 22-gauge needle, and the needle contents were injected subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice. The tumor fragment from which the biopsy was taken was also implanted subcutaneously in the contralateral side of the same mouse as a control. RESULTS: Success rates of the traditional method of xenograft implantation ranged from 27.3%-70%. Success rates of the fine needle aspirate technique ranged from 0%-36.4%. An attempt to engraft a percutaneous core needle liver biopsy of a metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma also was successful. CONCLUSION: We have found that it is possible to engraft fine needle aspirates and core biopsies of solid tumors in order to generate patient-derived xenografts. This may open up xenografting to a wider cancerpatient population than previously possible.
Authors: Michael P Kim; Douglas B Evans; Huamin Wang; James L Abbruzzese; Jason B Fleming; Gary E Gallick Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Belen Rubio-Viqueira; Antonio Jimeno; George Cusatis; Xianfeng Zhang; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Collins Karikari; Chanjusn Shi; Kathleen Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Koji Tanaka; Sharat Singh; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Nadia Bouraoud; Maria L Amador; Soner Altiok; Piotr Kulesza; Charles Yeo; Wells Messersmith; James Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: L Gorunova; M Höglund; A Andrén-Sandberg; S Dawiskiba; Y Jin; F Mitelman; B Johansson Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: S A Hahn; A B Seymour; A T Hoque; M Schutte; L T da Costa; M S Redston; C Caldas; C L Weinstein; A Fischer; C J Yeo Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1995-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hakho Lee; Tae-Jong Yoon; Jose-Luiz Figueiredo; Filip K Swirski; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Manuel Hidalgo; Frederic Amant; Andrew V Biankin; Eva Budinská; Annette T Byrne; Carlos Caldas; Robert B Clarke; Steven de Jong; Jos Jonkers; Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo; Sergio Roman-Roman; Joan Seoane; Livio Trusolino; Alberto Villanueva Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Michael P Kim; Jason B Fleming; Huamin Wang; James L Abbruzzese; Woonyoung Choi; Scott Kopetz; David J McConkey; Douglas B Evans; Gary E Gallick Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J I Johnson; S Decker; D Zaharevitz; L V Rubinstein; J M Venditti; S Schepartz; S Kalyandrug; M Christian; S Arbuck; M Hollingshead; E A Sausville Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-05-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Peter A Raven; Ninadh M D'Costa; Igor Moskalev; Zheng Tan; Sebastian Frees; Claudia Chavez-Munoz; Alan I So Journal: Am J Clin Exp Urol Date: 2018-12-20
Authors: Matthew C Hernandez; John R Bergquist; Jennifer L Leiting; Tommy Ivanics; Lin Yang; Rory L Smoot; David M Nagorney; Mark J Truty Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sun Il Choi; A-Ra Jeon; Min Kyeong Kim; Yu-Sun Lee; Ji Eun Im; Jung-Wook Koh; Sung-Sik Han; Sun-Young Kong; Kyong-Ah Yoon; Young-Hwan Koh; Ju Hee Lee; Woo Jin Lee; Sang-Jae Park; En Kyung Hong; Sang Myung Woo; Yun-Hee Kim Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Daniel Strüder; Theresa Momper; Nina Irmscher; Mareike Krause; Jan Liese; Sebastian Schraven; Annette Zimpfer; Sarah Zonnur; Ann-Sophie Burmeister; Björn Schneider; Bernhard Frerich; Robert Mlynski; Christina Große-Thie; Christian Junghanss; Claudia Maletzki Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-08-06