Literature DB >> 25403959

Ductal carcinoma in situ: a brief review of treatment variation and impacts on patients and society.

Christine Vatovec1, Mujde Z Erten2, Jane Kolodinsky3, Phil Brown4, Marie Wood5, Ted James6, Brian L Sprague6.   

Abstract

Nearly 20% of all breast cancer cases are ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), with over 60,000 cases diagnosed each year. Many of these cases would never cause clinical symptoms or threaten the life of the woman; however, it is currently impossible to distinguish which lesions will progress to invasive disease from those that will not. DCIS is generally associated with an excellent prognosis regardless of the treatment pathway, but there is variation in treatment aggressiveness that seems to exceed the medical uncertainty associated with DCIS management. Therefore, it would seem that a significant proportion of women with DCIS receive more extensive treatment than is needed. This overtreatment of DCIS is a growing concern among the breast cancer community and has implications for both the patient (via adverse treatment-related effects, as well as out-of-pocket costs) and society (via economic costs and the public health and environmental harm resulting from health care delivery). This article discusses DCIS treatment pathways and their implications for patients and society and calls for further research to examine the factors that are leading to such wide variation in treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403959      PMCID: PMC4372113          DOI: 10.1615/critreveukaryotgeneexpr.2014011495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr        ISSN: 1045-4403            Impact factor:   1.807


  44 in total

1.  Global air quality and pollution.

Authors:  Hajime Akimoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Financial burden of health care, 2001-2004.

Authors:  Jessica S Banthin; Peter Cunningham; Didem M Bernard
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality?

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; John D Keen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comprehensive side-effect profile of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: long-term safety analysis of the ATAC trial.

Authors:  A Buzdar; A Howell; J Cuzick; C Wale; W Distler; G Hoctin-Boes; J Houghton; G Y Locker; J M Nabholtz
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Melinda E Sanders; Peggy A Schuyler; William D Dupont; David L Page
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Physical activity behaviors in women with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma-in-situ.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ligibel; Ann Partridge; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Mehra Golshan; Karen Emmons; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Stephanie Jarosek; Elizabeth B Habermann; Amanda Arrington; Anasooya Abraham; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont; L W Rogers; M Landenberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  An ecological perspective on medical care: environmental, occupational, and public health impacts of medical supply and pharmaceutical chains.

Authors:  Christine Vatovec; Laura Senier; Michael Bell
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.184

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sulforaphane Bioavailability and Chemopreventive Activity in Women Scheduled for Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Lauren L Atwell; Zhenzhen Zhang; Motomi Mori; Paige Farris; John T Vetto; Arpana M Naik; Karen Y Oh; Philippe Thuillier; Emily Ho; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-10-28

2.  Regulatory T Cells Control the Switch From in situ to Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Leandro M Martinez; Valentina Robila; Nicholas M Clark; Wei Du; Michael O Idowu; Melanie R Rutkowski; Paula D Bos
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 7.561

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.