Literature DB >> 23842665

An ecological perspective on medical care: environmental, occupational, and public health impacts of medical supply and pharmaceutical chains.

Christine Vatovec1, Laura Senier, Michael Bell.   

Abstract

Healthcare organizations are increasingly examining the impacts of their facilities and operations on the natural environment, their workers, and the broader community, but the ecological impacts of specific healthcare services provided within these institutions have not been assessed. This paper provides a qualitative assessment of healthcare practices that takes into account the life-cycle impacts of a variety of materials used in typical medical care. We conducted an ethnographic study of three medical inpatient units: a conventional cancer ward, palliative care unit, and a hospice center. Participant observations (73 participants) of healthcare and support staff including physicians, nurses, housekeepers, and administrators were made to inventory materials and document practices used in patient care. Semi-structured interviews provided insight into common practices. We identified three major domains that highlight the cumulative environmental, occupational health, and public health impacts of medical supplies and pharmaceuticals used at our research sites: (1) medical supply procurement; (2) generation, handling, and disposal of medical waste; and (3) pharmaceutical handling and disposal. Impacts discovered through ethnographic inquiry included occupational exposures to chemotherapy and infectious waste, and public health exposures to pharmaceutical waste. This study provides new insight into the environmental, occupational, and public health impacts resulting from medical practices. In many cases, the lack of clear guidance and regulations regarding environmental impacts contributed to elevated harms to the natural environment, workers, and the broader community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23842665     DOI: 10.1007/s10393-013-0855-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecohealth        ISSN: 1612-9202            Impact factor:   3.184


  23 in total

1.  Ethnography and health care.

Authors:  J Savage
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

2.  Global air quality and pollution.

Authors:  Hajime Akimoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reprocessing SUDs reduces waste, costs.

Authors:  John DiConsiglio
Journal:  Mater Manag Health Care       Date:  2008-09

4.  Occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents: self-reported miscarriages and stillbirths among nurses and pharmacists.

Authors:  B Valanis; W M Vollmer; P Steele
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services. The Health Project Consortium.

Authors:  J F Fries; C E Koop; C E Beadle; P P Cooper; M J England; R F Greaves; J J Sokolov; D Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Incinerator toxic emissions: a brief summary of human health effects with a note on regulatory control.

Authors:  S C Rowat
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 7.  Qualitative environmental health research: an analysis of the literature, 1991-2008.

Authors:  Madeleine Kangsen Scammell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Leukaemia and reproductive outcome among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  T Skov; B Maarup; J Olsen; M Rørth; H Winthereik; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-12

Review 9.  Qualitative methods in environmental health research.

Authors:  Phil Brown
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Evaluation of the public health risks associated with semivolatile metal and dioxin emissions from hazardous waste incinerators.

Authors:  R M Sedman; J R Esparza
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: a brief review of treatment variation and impacts on patients and society.

Authors:  Christine Vatovec; Mujde Z Erten; Jane Kolodinsky; Phil Brown; Marie Wood; Ted James; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 2.  CHIMGEN: a Chinese imaging genetics cohort to enhance cross-ethnic and cross-geographic brain research.

Authors:  Qiang Xu; Lining Guo; Jingliang Cheng; Meiyun Wang; Zuojun Geng; Wenzhen Zhu; Bing Zhang; Weihua Liao; Shijun Qiu; Hui Zhang; Xiaojun Xu; Yongqiang Yu; Bo Gao; Tong Han; Zhenwei Yao; Guangbin Cui; Feng Liu; Wen Qin; Quan Zhang; Mulin Jun Li; Meng Liang; Feng Chen; Junfang Xian; Jiance Li; Jing Zhang; Xi-Nian Zuo; Dawei Wang; Wen Shen; Yanwei Miao; Fei Yuan; Su Lui; Xiaochu Zhang; Kai Xu; Long Jiang Zhang; Zhaoxiang Ye; Chunshui Yu
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 15.992

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.