Literature DB >> 25403507

Imaging the delivery of brain-penetrating PLGA nanoparticles in the brain using magnetic resonance.

Garth Strohbehn1, Daniel Coman, Liang Han, Ragy R T Ragheb, Tarek M Fahmy, Anita J Huttner, Fahmeed Hyder, Joseph M Piepmeier, W Mark Saltzman, Jiangbing Zhou.   

Abstract

Current therapy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is largely ineffective, with nearly universal tumor recurrence. The failure of current therapy is primarily due to the lack of approaches for the efficient delivery of therapeutics to diffuse tumors in the brain. In our prior study, we developed brain-penetrating nanoparticles that are capable of penetrating brain tissue and distribute over clinically relevant volumes when administered via convection-enhanced delivery (CED). We demonstrated that these particles are capable of efficient delivery of chemotherapeutics to diffuse tumors in the brain, indicating that they may serve as a groundbreaking approach for the treatment of GBM. In the original study, nanoparticles in the brain were imaged using positron emission tomography (PET). However, clinical translation of this delivery platform can be enabled by engineering a non-invasive detection modality using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For this purpose, we developed chemistry to incorporate superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) into the brain-penetrating nanoparticles. We demonstrated that SPIO-loaded nanoparticles, which retain the same morphology as nanoparticles without SPIO, have an excellent transverse (T(2)) relaxivity. After CED, the distribution of nanoparticles in the brain (i.e., in the vicinity of injection site) can be detected using MRI and the long-lasting signal attenuation of SPIO-loaded brain-penetrating nanoparticles lasted over a one-month timecourse. Development of these nanoparticles is significant as, in future clinical applications, co-administration of SPIO-loaded nanoparticles will allow for intraoperative monitoring of particle distribution in the brain to ensure drug-loaded nanoparticles reach tumors as well as for monitoring the therapeutic benefit with time and to evaluate tumor relapse patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403507      PMCID: PMC4323763          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1658-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  44 in total

1.  Neurobiology: at the root of brain cancer.

Authors:  Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A pilot investigation of new superparamagnetic iron oxide (ferumoxytol) as a contrast agent for cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Martin R Prince; Hong Lei Zhang; Shalini G Chabra; Paula Jacobs; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 1.535

3.  EGFRvIII antibody-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging-guided convection-enhanced delivery and targeted therapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Costas G Hadjipanayis; Revaz Machaidze; Milota Kaluzova; Liya Wang; Albert J Schuette; Hongwei Chen; Xinying Wu; Hui Mao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging and potential therapeutic applications in neurooncology and central nervous system inflammatory pathologies, a review.

Authors:  Jason S Weinstein; Csanad G Varallyay; Edit Dosa; Seymur Gahramanov; Bronwyn Hamilton; William D Rooney; Leslie L Muldoon; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain.

Authors:  R H Bobo; D W Laske; A Akbasak; P F Morrison; R L Dedrick; E H Oldfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  In vivo macrophage activity imaging in the central nervous system detected by magnetic resonance.

Authors:  V Dousset; C Delalande; L Ballarino; B Quesson; D Seilhan; M Coussemacq; E Thiaudiére; B Brochet; P Canioni; J M Caillé
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Poor drug distribution as a possible explanation for the results of the PRECISE trial.

Authors:  John H Sampson; Gary Archer; Christoph Pedain; Eva Wembacher-Schröder; Manfred Westphal; Sandeep Kunwar; Michael A Vogelbaum; April Coan; James E Herndon; Raghu Raghavan; Martin L Brady; David A Reardon; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman; M Inmaculada Rodríguez-Ponce; Susan M Chang; Stephan Mittermeyer; David Croteau; Raj K Puri
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Highly penetrative, drug-loaded nanocarriers improve treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jiangbing Zhou; Toral R Patel; Rachael W Sirianni; Garth Strohbehn; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Nha Duong; Thomas Schafbauer; Anita J Huttner; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson; Ying Zhang; David J Sullivan; Joseph M Piepmeier; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  New methods for direct delivery of chemotherapy for treating brain tumors.

Authors:  Andrew J Sawyer; Joseph M Piepmeier; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2006-12
View more
  16 in total

1.  Imaging the intratumoral-peritumoral extracellular pH gradient of gliomas.

Authors:  Daniel Coman; Yuegao Huang; Jyotsna U Rao; Henk M De Feyter; Douglas L Rothman; Christoph Juchem; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Leveraging the interplay of nanotechnology and neuroscience: Designing new avenues for treating central nervous system disorders.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Smith; Joshua E Porterfield; Rangaramanujam M Kannan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for imaging, targeting and treatment of primary and metastatic tumors of the brain.

Authors:  Liron L Israel; Anna Galstyan; Eggehard Holler; Julia Y Ljubimova
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Increased Nanoparticle Delivery to Brain Tumors by Autocatalytic Priming for Improved Treatment and Imaging.

Authors:  Liang Han; Derek K Kong; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Sasidhar Murikinati; Chao Ma; Peng Yuan; Liyuan Li; Daofeng Tian; Qiang Cai; Chunlin Ye; Daniel Holden; June-Hee Park; Xiaobin Gao; Jean-Leon Thomas; Jaime Grutzendler; Richard E Carson; Yiyun Huang; Joseph M Piepmeier; Jiangbing Zhou
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Single small molecule-assembled nanoparticles mediate efficient oral drug delivery.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Chao Ma; Zeming Chen; Jun Liu; Fuyao Liu; Rongbin Xie; Haitian Zhao; Gang Deng; Ann T Chen; Ningbo Gong; Lei Yao; Pengjian Zuo; Kangkang Zhi; Jiacheng Wang; Xiaobin Gao; Jing Wang; Louzhen Fan; Jiangbing Zhou
Journal:  Nano Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 10.269

6.  PEGylated squalenoyl-gemcitabine nanoparticles for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alice Gaudin; Eric Song; Amanda R King; Jennifer K Saucier-Sawyer; Ranjit Bindra; Didier Desmaële; Patrick Couvreur; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Decreased non-specific adhesivity, receptor targeted (DART) nanoparticles exhibit improved dispersion, cellular uptake, and tumor retention in invasive gliomas.

Authors:  Aniket S Wadajkar; Jimena G Dancy; Nathan B Roberts; Nina P Connolly; Dudley K Strickland; Jeffrey A Winkles; Graeme F Woodworth; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Nanomaterials for convection-enhanced delivery of agents to treat brain tumors.

Authors:  Young-Eun Seo; Tom Bu; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 9.  Phytonanomaterials as therapeutic agents and drug delivery carriers.

Authors:  Ying Xie; Chao Ma; Xin Yang; Jiacheng Wang; Gretchen Long; Jiangbing Zhou
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 17.873

10.  Biomimetic Lipopolysaccharide-Free Bacterial Outer Membrane-Functionalized Nanoparticles for Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Haiyan Chen; Mengyuan Zhou; Yuteng Zeng; Tongtong Miao; Haoyuan Luo; Yang Tong; Mei Zhao; Rui Mu; Jiang Gu; Shudi Yang; Liang Han
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 17.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.