Literature DB >> 23448898

Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Alina Karpova1, Ranganathan Arun, Aileen M Davis, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Eric M Massicotte, David J Mikulis, Zvonimir I Lubina, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging and clinical and demographic findings in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were independently associated with baseline functional scores and whether these were also predictive of postoperative functional outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are considerable limitations in current literature that prevent making formal recommendations regarding the use of clinical and radiological prognostic factors in patients with CSM.
METHODS: This prospective study included 65 consecutive patients with CSM treated in a tertiary referral center. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale was used to quantify disability at admission and at 12-month follow-up. Age, sex, duration of symptoms, severity of myelopathy, spinal column alignment, surgical technique, levels of compression, anteroposterior diameter and transverse area at the site of maximal cord compression, and magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity changes were assessed. Data were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation test, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U test, and stepwise multivariate regression.
RESULTS: Higher baseline mJOA scores were associated with younger age (P = 0.0002), shorter duration of symptoms (P = 0.03), and greater transverse area (P = 0.02). Better recovery ratio was associated with younger age (P = 0.005) and higher baseline mJOA score (P = 0.003). Greater changes in mJOA score were associated with higher baseline mJOA score (P < 0.0001). Using multivariate analysis, the functional outcomes after surgery were best predicted by baseline mJOA score and age of patient.
CONCLUSION: Age and baseline mJOA scores were highly predictive of outcome for patients undergoing surgical treatment of CSM. The degree of spinal cord compression and patterns of signal intensity changes on T1/T2 weighted images were not independently predictive of outcome, but it was found to correlate with the functional status at the time of presentation and age of the patient. The duration of symptoms correlated well with preoperative functional status but did not seem to affect the postoperative outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23448898     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182715bc3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis correlates with surgical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  L-Q Sun; Y-M Li; X Wang; H-C Cao
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging can predict surgical outcomes of patients with cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Satoshi Maki; Masao Koda; Mitsuhiro Kitamura; Taigo Inada; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Yasushi Iijima; Junya Saito; Yoshitada Masuda; Koji Matsumoto; Masatoshi Kojima; Takayuki Obata; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Risk factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  J T Zhang; L F Wang; S Wang; J Li; Y Shen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex correlates with objective clinical measures in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Marcus D Mazur; Andrea White; Sara McEvoy; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  So Kato; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

6.  Outcome factors in surgically treated patients for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jiolanda Zika; George A Alexiou; Sotirios Giannopoulos; Ioannis Kastanioudakis; Athanasios P Kyritsis; Spyridon Voulgaris
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Trends in Nonoperative Treatment Modalities Prior to Cervical Surgery and Impact on Patient-Derived Outcomes: Two-Year Analysis of 1522 Patients From the Prospective Spine Treatment Outcome Study.

Authors:  Michael C Gerling; Kris Radcliff; Robert Isaacs; Kristina Bianco; Cyrus M Jalai; Nancy J Worley; Gregory W Poorman; Samantha R Horn; Olivia J Bono; John Moon; Paul M Arnold; Alexander R Vaccaro; Peter Passias
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

8.  Functional Outcomes of Surgery in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy versus Myelopathy: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  F Omidi-Kashani; E G Hasankhani; M F Vavsari; S Afsari; F Golhasani-Keshtan
Journal:  Neurosci J       Date:  2013-08-18

9.  Disruption of human brain connectivity networks in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yuan Cao; Yaru Zhan; Miao Du; Guoshu Zhao; Zhili Liu; Fuqing Zhou; Laichang He
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

10.  A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Current Research Trends in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Mengchen Yin; Chongqing Xu; Junming Ma; Jie Ye; Wen Mo
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.