Literature DB >> 25403276

Characterizing airborne fungal and bacterial concentrations and emission rates in six occupied children's classrooms.

D Hospodsky1, N Yamamoto1,2, W W Nazaroff3, D Miller1, S Gorthala1, J Peccia1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Baseline information on size-resolved bacterial, fungal, and particulate matter (PM) indoor air concentrations and emission rates is presented for six school classrooms sampled in four countries. Human occupancy resulted in significantly elevated airborne bacterial (81 times on average), fungal (15 times), and PM mass (nine times) concentrations as compared to vacant conditions. Occupied indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios consistently exceeded vacant I/O ratios. Regarding size distributions, average room-occupied bacterial, fungal, and PM geometric mean particle sizes were similar to one another while geometric means estimated for bacteria, fungi, and PM mass during vacant sampling were consistently lower than when occupied. Occupancy also resulted in elevated indoor bacterial-to-PM mass-based and number-based ratios above corresponding outdoor levels. Mean emission rates due to human occupancy were 14 million cells/person/h for bacteria, 14 million spore equivalents/person/h for fungi, and 22 mg/person/h for PM mass. Across all locations, indoor emissions contributed 83 ± 27% (bacteria), 66 ± 19% (fungi), and 83 ± 24% (PM mass) of the average indoor air concentrations during occupied times. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: An extensive data set of bacterial and fungal size-distributed indoor air concentrations and emission rates is presented. Analysis of these data contributes to an understanding of how indoor bacterial and fungal aerosols are influenced by human occupancy. This work extends beyond prior culture and DNA-based microbiome studies in buildings to include quantitative relationships between size-resolved bacterial and fungal concentrations in indoor air and building parameters such as occupancy, ventilation, and outdoor conditions. The work indicates that occupancy-associated emissions (e.g., via resuspension and shedding) contribute more to both bacterial and fungal indoor air concentrations than do outdoor sources for the occupied classrooms investigated in this study.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioaerosols; Exposure; Indoor microbiome; Particle size distribution; Quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Resuspension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403276     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  29 in total

1.  Influence of housing characteristics on bacterial and fungal communities in homes of asthmatic children.

Authors:  K C Dannemiller; J F Gent; B P Leaderer; J Peccia
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Recovery of Fungal Cells from Air Samples: a Tale of Loss and Gain.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Wieke Teertstra; Willem Kegel; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Han A B Wösten; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Air-sampled Filter Analysis for Endotoxins and DNA Content.

Authors:  Naama Lang-Yona; Yinon Mazar; Michal Pardo; Yinon Rudich
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Total Virus and Bacteria Concentrations in Indoor and Outdoor Air.

Authors:  Aaron J Prussin; Ellen B Garcia; Linsey C Marr
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2015

5.  Chamber bioaerosol study: outdoor air and human occupants as sources of indoor airborne microbes.

Authors:  Rachel I Adams; Seema Bhangar; Wilmer Pasut; Edward A Arens; John W Taylor; Steven E Lindow; William W Nazaroff; Thomas D Bruns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Concentrations and Sources of Airborne Particles in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Dusan Licina; Seema Bhangar; Brandon Brooks; Robyn Baker; Brian Firek; Xiaochen Tang; Michael J Morowitz; Jillian F Banfield; William W Nazaroff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  What Have We Learned about the Microbiomes of Indoor Environments?

Authors:  Brent Stephens
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Non-selective Separation of Bacterial Cells with Magnetic Nanoparticles Facilitated by Varying Surface Charge.

Authors:  Xin-Lei Gao; Ming-Fei Shao; Yi-Sheng Xu; Yi Luo; Kai Zhang; Feng Ouyang; Ji Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Humans differ in their personal microbial cloud.

Authors:  James F Meadow; Adam E Altrichter; Ashley C Bateman; Jason Stenson; G Z Brown; Jessica L Green; Brendan J M Bohannan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  The roles of the outdoors and occupants in contributing to a potential pan-microbiome of the built environment: a review.

Authors:  Marcus H Y Leung; Patrick K H Lee
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.