PURPOSE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) provide guidelines for surveillance after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we assess the ability of the guidelines to capture RCC recurrences and determine the duration of surveillance required to capture 90%, 95%, and 100% of recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 3,651 patients who underwent surgery for M0 RCC between 1970 and 2008. Patients were stratified as AUA low risk (pT1Nx-0) after partial (LR-partial) or radical nephrectomy (LR-radical) or as moderate/high risk (M/HR; pT2-4Nx-0/pTanyN1). Guidelines were assessed by calculating the percentage of recurrences detected when following the 2013 and 2014 NCCN and AUA recommendations, and associated Medicare costs were compared. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 9.0 years (interquartile range, 5.7 to 14.4 years), a total of 1,088 patients (29.8%) experienced a recurrence. Of these, 390 recurrences (35.9%) were detected using 2013 NCCN recommendations, 742 recurrences (68.2%) were detected using 2014 NCCN recommendations, and 728 recurrences (66.9%) were detected using AUA recommendations. All protocols missed the greatest amount of recurrences in the abdomen and among pT1Nx-0 patients. To capture 95% of recurrences, surveillance was required for 15 years for LR-partial, 21 years for LR-radical, and 14 years for M/HR patients. Medicare surveillance costs for one LR-partial patient were $1,228.79 using 2013 NCCN, $2,131.52 using 2014 NCCN, and $1,738.31 using AUA guidelines. However, if 95% of LR-partial recurrences were captured, costs would total $9,856.82. CONCLUSION: If strictly followed, the 2014 NCCN and AUA guidelines will miss approximately one third of RCC recurrences. Improved surveillance algorithms, which balance patient benefits and health care costs, are needed.
PURPOSE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) provide guidelines for surveillance after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we assess the ability of the guidelines to capture RCC recurrences and determine the duration of surveillance required to capture 90%, 95%, and 100% of recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 3,651 patients who underwent surgery for M0 RCC between 1970 and 2008. Patients were stratified as AUA low risk (pT1Nx-0) after partial (LR-partial) or radical nephrectomy (LR-radical) or as moderate/high risk (M/HR; pT2-4Nx-0/pTanyN1). Guidelines were assessed by calculating the percentage of recurrences detected when following the 2013 and 2014 NCCN and AUA recommendations, and associated Medicare costs were compared. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 9.0 years (interquartile range, 5.7 to 14.4 years), a total of 1,088 patients (29.8%) experienced a recurrence. Of these, 390 recurrences (35.9%) were detected using 2013 NCCN recommendations, 742 recurrences (68.2%) were detected using 2014 NCCN recommendations, and 728 recurrences (66.9%) were detected using AUA recommendations. All protocols missed the greatest amount of recurrences in the abdomen and among pT1Nx-0 patients. To capture 95% of recurrences, surveillance was required for 15 years for LR-partial, 21 years for LR-radical, and 14 years for M/HR patients. Medicare surveillance costs for one LR-partial patient were $1,228.79 using 2013 NCCN, $2,131.52 using 2014 NCCN, and $1,738.31 using AUA guidelines. However, if 95% of LR-partial recurrences were captured, costs would total $9,856.82. CONCLUSION: If strictly followed, the 2014 NCCN and AUA guidelines will miss approximately one third of RCC recurrences. Improved surveillance algorithms, which balance patient benefits and health care costs, are needed.
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Neeraj Agarwal; Clair Beard; Graeme B Bolger; Barry Boston; Michael A Carducci; Toni K Choueiri; Robert A Figlin; Mayer Fishman; Steven L Hancock; Gary R Hudes; Eric Jonasch; Anne Kessinger; Timothy M Kuzel; Paul H Lange; Ellis G Levine; Kim A Margolin; M Dror Michaelson; Thomas Olencki; Roberto Pili; Bruce G Redman; Cary N Robertson; Lawrence H Schwartz; Joel Sheinfeld; Jue Wang Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: John S Lam; Oleg Shvarts; John T Leppert; Allan J Pantuck; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Simon P Kim; Christopher J Weight; Bradley C Leibovich; R Houston Thompson; Brian A Costello; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Stephen A Boorjian Journal: Urology Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Amnon Zisman; Allan J Pantuck; Jeffery Wieder; Debby H Chao; Fredrick Dorey; Jonathan W Said; Jean B deKernion; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew J Stephenson; Michael P Chetner; Keith Rourke; Martin E Gleave; M Signaevsky; Bruce Palmer; James Kuan; Gerald B Brock; Simon Tanguay Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sherri M Donat; Mireya Diaz; Jay Todd Bishoff; Jonathan A Coleman; Philipp Dahm; Ithaar H Derweesh; S Duke Herrell; Susan Hilton; Eric Jonasch; Daniel W Lin; Victor E Reuter; Sam S Chang Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jozefina Casuscelli; Nils Weinhold; Gunes Gundem; Lu Wang; Emily C Zabor; Esther Drill; Patricia I Wang; Gouri J Nanjangud; Almedina Redzematovic; Amrita M Nargund; Brandon J Manley; Maria E Arcila; Nicholas M Donin; John C Cheville; R Houston Thompson; Allan J Pantuck; Paul Russo; Emily H Cheng; William Lee; Satish K Tickoo; Irina Ostrovnaya; Chad J Creighton; Elli Papaemmanuil; Venkatraman E Seshan; A Ari Hakimi; James J Hsieh Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-06-15
Authors: Y A M Kuijpers; R P Meijer; G N Jonges; J de Jong; J L H R Bosch; S Horenblas; A Bex Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Christian Beisland; Gigja Guðbrandsdottir; Lars A R Reisæter; Leif Bostad; Karin M Hjelle Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Michael A Feuerstein; John E Musser; Matthew Kent; Michael Chevinsky; Eugene K Cha; Simon Kimm; William M Hilton; Daniel D Sjoberg; Timothy F Donahue; Hebert A Vargas; Jonathan A Coleman; Paul Russo Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Paolo Capogrosso; Alessandro Larcher; Daniel D Sjoberg; Emily A Vertosick; Francesco Cianflone; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Cristina Carenzi; Andrea Salonia; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini; Umberto Capitanio Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 7.450