Literature DB >> 25403196

Pain sensitivity and healing of hot-iron cattle brands.

C B Tucker1, E M Mintline2, J Banuelos2, K A Walker3, B Hoar4, A Varga5, D Drake2, D M Weary3.   

Abstract

Hot-iron branding is painful for cattle, but little is known about the duration of or effective methods to control this pain. This work quantified pain sensitivity and healing in branded and unbranded animals. In addition, the effects of a single injection of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) were also considered; this has been suggested as practical method of mitigating pain in the hours after the procedure. Calves (mean±SE, 126±2.2 d and 112±2.8 kg) were hot-iron branded and allocated to 1 of 4 treatments: branded with or without flunixin meglumine (intravenous; 1.1 mg/kg) and unbranded with or without this NSAID (n=12/treatment). Pain sensitivity was assessed by applying a known and increasing force with a von Frey anesthesiometer in the center of the brand (or equivalent area in nonbranded treatments) until animals showed a behavioral response. Healing was measured with a 6-point scale (1=fresh brand and 6=no scabbing and fully repigmented). These measures, along with weight gain and surface temperature, were recorded 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 56, and 71 d after branding. Lying behavior was recorded with loggers from the day before to d 27 after branding. Brand wounds were more painful than nonbranded tissue (P<0.001). These differences were most pronounced in the days immediately after branding (e.g., d 7; 113±36 g of force for Brand vs. 449±23 g force for No brand, mean±SE) but persisted until d 71 (380±37 g force for Brand vs. 453±23 g of force for No brand, mean±SE); only 67% of brands were fully regimented or healed by this time. The first fully healed brand was identified 8 wk after the procedure. Giving a single injection of flunixin had no brand-specific effects on sensitivity, surface temperature, or healing but improved weight gain in the days after branding in all treated groups (flunixin×brand×day, P<0.001). Flunixin-treated animals also spent 0.7 h less time lying down on the day of branding but tended to spend more time lying on d 15 and 26 after the procedure. The magnitude of these differences is small, less than the day-to-day variation, and not brand specific. In summary, brand wounds take at least 8 wk to heal. These wounds remain painful for a least this long, and a single injection of NSAID has no measurable effect in mitigating pain associated with branding, even in days immediately after the procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; branding; cattle; healing; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; wound sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403196     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

Review 1.  Analgesia for Sheep in Commercial Production: Where to Next?

Authors:  Alison Small; Andrew David Fisher; Caroline Lee; Ian Colditz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Effect of subcutaneous meloxicam on indicators of acute pain and distress after castration and branding in 2-mo-old beef calves1,2.

Authors:  Daniela M Meléndez; Sonia Marti; Ed A Pajor; Diego Moya; Désirée Gellatly; Eugene D Janzen; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  To Treat or Not to Treat: The Effects of Pain on Experimental Parameters.

Authors:  Norman C Peterson; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Pharmacokinetics and Mitigation of Procedural-Pain in Cattle.

Authors:  Brooklyn K Wagner; Emma Nixon; Ivelisse Robles; Ronald E Baynes; Johann F Coetzee; Monique D Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Conditioned place preference reveals ongoing pain in calves 3 weeks after disbudding.

Authors:  Sarah J J Adcock; Cassandra B Tucker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The effect of breed, sex, and oral meloxicam administration on pain biomarkers following hot-iron branding in Hereford and Angus calves.

Authors:  Miriam S Martin; Michael D Kleinhenz; Lily N Edwards-Callaway; Terry E Engle; Octavio Guimaraes; David W Schafer; Shawnee R Montgomery; Andrew K Curtis; Mikaela M Weeder; Devin R Jacobs; Johann F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Evaluation of non-invasive bioforensic techniques for determining the age of hot-iron brand burn scars in cattle.

Authors:  Douglas R Tolleson; David W Schafer
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-15

9.  Evaluating treatments with topical anaesthetic and buccal meloxicam for pain and inflammation caused by amputation dehorning of calves.

Authors:  Dominique Van der Saag; Sabrina Lomax; Peter Andrew Windsor; Casey Taylor; Peter John White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Sarah J J Adcock; Cassandra B Tucker; Gayani Weerasinghe; Eranda Rajapaksha
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.