Sukhmani K Padda1, Jonathan W Riess, Erich J Schwartz, Lu Tian, Holbrook E Kohrt, Joel W Neal, Robert B West, Heather A Wakelee. 1. *Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; †Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; ‡Department of Pathology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; and §Department of Health and Research Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Blockade of the immune checkpoint programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1)/PD-1 pathway has well-established clinical activity across many tumor types. PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry is emerging as a predictive biomarker of response to these therapies. Here, we examine PD-L1 expression in a thymic epithelial tumor (TET) tissue microarray (TMA). METHODS: The TMA contained 69 TETs and 17 thymic controls, with each case represented by triplicate cores. The TMA was stained with rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone 15; Sino Biological, Beijing, China) to human PD-L1. PD-L1 staining was scored based on intensity as follows: 0 = none, 1 = equivocal/uninterpretable, 2 = weak, and 3 = intermediate-strong. Those cases with all cores scoring three in the epithelial component were categorized as PD-L1 high and the remaining as PD-L1 low. RESULTS: PD-L1 high scores were more frequent in TETs than in controls (68.1% versus 17.6%; p = 0.0036). PD-L1 scores and histology were significantly correlated, with higher intensity staining in World Health Organization (WHO). B2/B3/C TETs. Only 14.8% of TETs had PD-L1 staining of associated lymphocytes. In an adjusted analysis (age/sex), PD-L1 high TETs had a significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio: 5.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-25.89; p = 0.035) and a trend for worse event-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-9.24; p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 expression was present in all cases of TETs within the epithelial component but only in a minority in the lymphocytic component. TETs stained more intensely for PD-L1 than in controls, and PD-L1 high TETs were associated with more aggressive histology and worse prognosis. This study lends rationale to a clinical trial with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in this rare tumor type.
INTRODUCTION: Blockade of the immune checkpoint programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1)/PD-1 pathway has well-established clinical activity across many tumor types. PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry is emerging as a predictive biomarker of response to these therapies. Here, we examine PD-L1 expression in a thymic epithelial tumor (TET) tissue microarray (TMA). METHODS: The TMA contained 69 TETs and 17 thymic controls, with each case represented by triplicate cores. The TMA was stained with rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone 15; Sino Biological, Beijing, China) to humanPD-L1. PD-L1 staining was scored based on intensity as follows: 0 = none, 1 = equivocal/uninterpretable, 2 = weak, and 3 = intermediate-strong. Those cases with all cores scoring three in the epithelial component were categorized as PD-L1 high and the remaining as PD-L1 low. RESULTS:PD-L1 high scores were more frequent in TETs than in controls (68.1% versus 17.6%; p = 0.0036). PD-L1 scores and histology were significantly correlated, with higher intensity staining in World Health Organization (WHO). B2/B3/C TETs. Only 14.8% of TETs had PD-L1 staining of associated lymphocytes. In an adjusted analysis (age/sex), PD-L1 high TETs had a significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio: 5.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-25.89; p = 0.035) and a trend for worse event-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-9.24; p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS:PD-L1 expression was present in all cases of TETs within the epithelial component but only in a minority in the lymphocytic component. TETs stained more intensely for PD-L1 than in controls, and PD-L1 high TETs were associated with more aggressive histology and worse prognosis. This study lends rationale to a clinical trial with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in this rare tumor type.
Authors: Girum L Lemma; Ju-Whei Lee; Seena C Aisner; Corey J Langer; William J Tester; David H Johnson; Patrick J Loehrer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elaine Bigelow; Katherine M Bever; Haiying Xu; Allison Yager; Annie Wu; Janis Taube; Lieping Chen; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Robert A Anders; Lei Zheng Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Lin Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis A Gimotty; Marco Massobrio; Giorgia Regnani; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Heidi Gray; Katia Schlienger; Michael N Liebman; Stephen C Rubin; George Coukos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hyun-Sung Lee; Hee-Jin Jang; Rohan Shah; David Yoon; Masatsugu Hamaji; Ori Wald; Ju-Seog Lee; David J Sugarbaker; Bryan M Burt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dwight Owen; Benjamin Chu; Amy M Lehman; Lakshmanan Annamalai; Jennifer H Yearley; Konstantin Shilo; Gregory A Otterson Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Annikka Weissferdt; Junya Fujimoto; Neda Kalhor; Jaime Rodriguez; Roland Bassett; Ignacio I Wistuba; Cesar A Moran Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 7.842