Jessie R Nedrow1, Anders Josefsson1, Sunju Park1, Sagar Ranka1, Sanchita Roy1, George Sgouros2. 1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland gsgouros@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is part of an immune checkpoint system that is essential for preventing autoimmunity and cancer. Recent approaches in immunotherapy that target immune checkpoints have shown great promise in a variety of cancers, including metastatic melanoma. The use of targeted molecular imaging would help identify patients who will best respond to anti-PD-L1 treatment while potentially providing key information to limit immune-related adverse effects. Recently, we developed an antibody-based PD-L1-targeted SPECT agent-111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-anti-PD-L1-to identify PD-L1-positive tumors in vivo. To best use such PD-L1-targeted imaging agents, it is important, as a first step, to understand how the signal is affected by different parameters. Methods: We evaluated the impact of protein concentration on the distribution of 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1 in a murine model of aggressive melanoma. Results: 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1 (dissociation constant, 0.6 ± 0.1 nM) demonstrated increased uptake in B16F10 tumors at protein concentrations equaling or exceeding 1 mg/kg at 24 h and 3 mg/kg at 72 h. At 24 h, the PD-L1-rich spleen and lungs demonstrated decreasing uptake with increasing protein concentration. At 72 h, uptake in the thymus was significantly increased at protein concentrations of 3 mg/kg or greater. Both time points demonstrated increased tracer amounts remaining in circulation as the amount of cold antibody was increased. Conclusion: These studies demonstrate that 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1 is capable of identifying tumors that overexpresses PD-L1 and monitoring the impact of PD-L1-rich organs on the distribution of anti-PD-L1 antibodies.
Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is part of an immune checkpoint system that is essential for preventing autoimmunity and cancer. Recent approaches in immunotherapy that target immune checkpoints have shown great promise in a variety of cancers, including metastatic melanoma. The use of targeted molecular imaging would help identify patients who will best respond to anti-PD-L1 treatment while potentially providing key information to limit immune-related adverse effects. Recently, we developed an antibody-based PD-L1-targeted SPECT agent-111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-anti-PD-L1-to identify PD-L1-positive tumors in vivo. To best use such PD-L1-targeted imaging agents, it is important, as a first step, to understand how the signal is affected by different parameters. Methods: We evaluated the impact of protein concentration on the distribution of 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1 in a murine model of aggressive melanoma. Results:111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1 (dissociation constant, 0.6 ± 0.1 nM) demonstrated increased uptake in B16F10 tumors at protein concentrations equaling or exceeding 1 mg/kg at 24 h and 3 mg/kg at 72 h. At 24 h, the PD-L1-rich spleen and lungs demonstrated decreasing uptake with increasing protein concentration. At 72 h, uptake in the thymus was significantly increased at protein concentrations of 3 mg/kg or greater. Both time points demonstrated increased tracer amounts remaining in circulation as the amount of cold antibody was increased. Conclusion: These studies demonstrate that 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1 is capable of identifying tumors that overexpresses PD-L1 and monitoring the impact of PD-L1-rich organs on the distribution of anti-PD-L1 antibodies.
Authors: John M Murray; Gilbert R Kaufmann; Philip D Hodgkin; Sharon R Lewin; Anthony D Kelleher; Miles P Davenport; John J Zaunders Journal: Immunol Cell Biol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.126
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Harriet Kluger; Margaret K Callahan; Michael A Postow; Naiyer A Rizvi; Alexander M Lesokhin; Neil H Segal; Charlotte E Ariyan; Ruth-Ann Gordon; Kathleen Reed; Matthew M Burke; Anne Caldwell; Stephanie A Kronenberg; Blessing U Agunwamba; Xiaoling Zhang; Israel Lowy; Hector David Inzunza; William Feely; Christine E Horak; Quan Hong; Alan J Korman; Jon M Wigginton; Ashok Gupta; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jessie R Nedrow; Joseph D Latoche; Kathryn E Day; Jalpa Modi; Tanushree Ganguly; Dexing Zeng; Brenda F Kurland; Clifford E Berkman; Carolyn J Anderson Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Haley L Wissler; Emily B Ehlerding; Zhigang Lyu; Yue Zhao; Si Zhang; Anisa Eshraghi; Zakey Yusuf Buuh; Jeffrey C McGuth; Yifu Guan; Jonathan W Engle; Sarah J Bartlett; Vincent A Voelz; Weibo Cai; Rongsheng E Wang Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Yingli Fu; Jing Yu; Ioanna Liatsou; Yong Du; Anders Josefsson; Jessie R Nedrow; Hans Rindt; Jeffrey N Bryan; Dara L Kraitchman; George Sgouros Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 9.236