Literature DB >> 25400501

The contribution of self-deceptive enhancement to display rules in the United States and Japan.

Joanne M Chung1.   

Abstract

Socially desirable responding was tested as a mediator of American and Japanese college student differences in display rules. Americans endorsed the expression of anger, contempt, disgust, fear, happiness, and surprise more than the Japanese. Americans also exhibited more self-deceptive enhancement than the Japanese, and self-deceptive enhancement partially mediated country differences on the endorsement of anger, disgust, happiness, and surprise, but not contempt and fear. These findings highlight the role of self-deceptive enhancement in contributing to expressive display rules and support the point of view that socially desirable responding is a reflection of one's personality and culture rather than a statistical nuisance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture; display rules; individual differences; mediation; self-deceptive enhancement; socially desirable responding

Year:  2012        PMID: 25400501      PMCID: PMC4231487          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01358.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 1367-2223


  12 in total

1.  The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity).

Authors:  P Rozin; L Lowery; S Imada; J Haidt
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-04

2.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

Authors:  D P CROWNE; D MARLOWE
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1960-08

3.  Development and validation of a measure of display rule knowledge: the display rule assessment inventory.

Authors:  David Matsumoto; Seung Hee Yoo; Satoko Hirayama; Galina Petrova
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-03

4.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

5.  What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding?

Authors:  Ashok K Lalwani; Sharon Shavitt; Timothy Johnson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-01

6.  Substance and style in socially desirable responding.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Lönnqvist; Sampo Paunonen; Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson; Jouko Lönnqvist; Markku Verkasalo
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2007-04

7.  Motivated response styles: the role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding.

Authors:  Ashok K Lalwani; L J Shrum; Chi-Yue Chiu
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-04

8.  Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion.

Authors:  P Ekman; E R Sorenson; W V Friesen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  CULTURAL DISPLAY RULES DRIVE EYE GAZE DURING THINKING.

Authors:  Anjanie McCarthy; Kang Lee; Shoji Itakura; Darwin W Muir
Journal:  J Cross Cult Psychol       Date:  2006-11

10.  Learning display rules: the socialization of emotion expression in infancy.

Authors:  C Z Malatesta; J M Haviland
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1982-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-cultural Comparison of Pharmacy Students' Attitudes, Knowledge, Practice, and Barriers Regarding Evidence-based Medicine.

Authors:  Aya F Ozaki; Sari Nakagawa; Cynthia A Jackevicius
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Emotion Norms, Display Rules, and Regulation in the Akan Society of Ghana: An Exploration Using Proverbs.

Authors:  Vivian A Dzokoto; Annabella Osei-Tutu; Jane J Kyei; Maxwell Twum-Asante; Dzifa A Attah; Daniel K Ahorsu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.