Literature DB >> 15755217

Development and validation of a measure of display rule knowledge: the display rule assessment inventory.

David Matsumoto1, Seung Hee Yoo, Satoko Hirayama, Galina Petrova.   

Abstract

As one component of emotion regulation, display rules, which reflect the regulation of expressive behavior, have been the topic of many studies. Despite their theoretical and empirical importance, however, to date there is no measure of display rules that assesses a full range of behavioral responses that are theoretically possible when emotion is elicited. This article reports the development of a new measure of display rules that surveys 5 expressive modes: expression, deamplification, amplification, qualification, and masking. Two studies provide evidence for its internal and temporal reliability and for its content, convergent, discriminant, external, and concurrent predictive validity. Additionally, Study 1, involving American, Russian, and Japanese participants, demonstrated predictable cultural differences on each of the expressive modes. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15755217     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  24 in total

1.  Spontaneous regulation of emotions in preschool children who stutter: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Kia N Johnson; Tedra A Walden; Edward G Conture; Jan Karrass
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Universality claim of attachment theory: Children's socioemotional development across cultures.

Authors:  Heidi Keller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A comparative study of the use and understanding of self-presentational display rules in children with high functioning autism and Asperger's disorder.

Authors:  Josephine Barbaro; Cheryl Dissanayake
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-08

4.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Heterogeneity of long-history migration explains cultural differences in reports of emotional expressivity and the functions of smiles.

Authors:  Magdalena Rychlowska; Yuri Miyamoto; David Matsumoto; Ursula Hess; Eva Gilboa-Schechtman; Shanmukh Kamble; Hamdi Muluk; Takahiko Masuda; Paula Marie Niedenthal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The contribution of self-deceptive enhancement to display rules in the United States and Japan.

Authors:  Joanne M Chung
Journal:  Asian J Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-03

7.  Evidence and a computational explanation of cultural differences in facial expression recognition.

Authors:  Matthew N Dailey; Carrie Joyce; Michael J Lyons; Miyuki Kamachi; Hanae Ishi; Jiro Gyoba; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-12

8.  Construct Validity of the Emotion Matching Task: Preliminary Evidence for Convergent and Criterion Validity of a New Emotion Knowledge Measure for Young Children.

Authors:  Judith K Morgan; Carroll E Izard; Kristen A King
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2009-01-21

9.  Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations.

Authors:  Disa A Sauter; Frank Eisner; Paul Ekman; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The development of infant detection of inauthentic emotion.

Authors:  Eric A Walle; Joseph J Campos
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.