Literature DB >> 25400420

Capecitabine maintenance therapy for XT chemotherapy-sensitive patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Xu Liang1, Lijun Di1, Guohong Song1, Ying Yan1, Chaoying Wang1, Hanfang Jiang1, Huiping Li1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy (MT) after initial capecitabine plus docetaxel (XT) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
METHODS: Fifty-five mTNBC patients treated with XT chemotherapy between May 2007 and June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. When initial disease control was achieved by the combination chemotherapy, capecitabine was continued for 32 patients (MT), while 23 patients remained without any treatment (non-MT). We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of both groups.
RESULTS: The median PFS of 55 patients was 8.1 months, overall median PFS time of 32 patients in the capecitabine MT group and 23 in the non-MT group was 10.1 vs. 6.7 months (P=0.032), respectively. When compared PFS time of maintenance treatment, single-agent capecitabine prolonged PFS by 7.1 months, for non-MT patients, the PFS without any treatment was 3.1 months, and this between-group difference was statistically significant (P=0.003). Adverse events, including of hematologic toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicities, hand-foot syndrome and abnormal liver function were not significantly different between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: After initial disease control was achieved with the XT combination chemotherapy, capecitabine MT can significantly prolong PFS time with a favorable safety profile in mTNBC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capecitabine; maintenance therapy (MT); metastatic breast cancer (MBC); triple-negative

Year:  2014        PMID: 25400420      PMCID: PMC4220247          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.10.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  28 in total

1.  Does triple-negative phenotype accurately identify basal-like tumour? An immunohistochemical analysis based on 143 'triple-negative' breast cancers.

Authors:  F-C Bidard; R Conforti; T Boulet; S Michiels; S Delaloge; F André
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment.

Authors:  G Falkson; R S Gelman; K J Pandya; C K Osborne; D Tormey; F J Cummings; G W Sledge; M D Abeloff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Continuing chemotherapy or not after the induction treatment in advanced breast cancer patients. clinical outcomes and oncologists' preferences.

Authors:  M A Nooij; J C J M de Haes; L V A M Beex; J Wildiers; J Klijn; D Becquart; J Jassem; E Engelsman; L Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  A review of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Roohi Ismail-Khan; Marilyn M Bui
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  B Sirohi; M Arnedos; S Popat; S Ashley; A Nerurkar; G Walsh; S Johnston; I E Smith
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Breast cancer as a global health concern.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Metronomics as maintenance treatment in oncology: time for chemo-switch.

Authors:  Prabhat Singh Malik; Vinod Raina; Nicolas André
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Maintenance hormonal treatment improves progression free survival after a first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Armelle Dufresne; Xavier Pivot; Christophe Tournigand; Thomas Facchini; Thierry Alweeg; Loic Chaigneau; Aimery De Gramont
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  The prognosis and risk factors for capecitabine maintenance treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Can Tian; Jianbo Yang; Ning Xie; Yu Tang; Haoyu Zhou; Zhe-Yu Hu; Quchang Ouyang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  Treatment of Metastatic or High-Risk Solid Cancer Patients by Targeting the Immune System and/or Tumor Burden: Six Cases Reports.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolini; Paola Ferrari; Riccardo Morganti; Angelo Carpi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The prognostic and predictive significance of cytokeratin 5/6 and epidermal growth factor receptor in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with maintenance capecitabine.

Authors:  Yiping Zhu; Kai Li; Jieling Zhang; Lu Wang; Lili Sheng; Liang Yan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.