Literature DB >> 25399415

GenoBase: comprehensive resource database of Escherichia coli K-12.

Yuta Otsuka1, Ai Muto1, Rikiya Takeuchi1, Chihiro Okada2, Motokazu Ishikawa2, Koichiro Nakamura2, Natsuko Yamamoto1, Hitomi Dose1, Kenji Nakahigashi3, Shigeki Tanishima2, Sivasundaram Suharnan4, Wataru Nomura1, Toru Nakayashiki1, Walid G Aref5, Barry R Bochner6, Tyrrell Conway7, Michael Gribskov8, Daisuke Kihara9, Kenneth E Rudd10, Yukako Tohsato11, Barry L Wanner12, Hirotada Mori13.   

Abstract

Comprehensive experimental resources, such as ORFeome clone libraries and deletion mutant collections, are fundamental tools for elucidation of gene function. Data sets by omics analysis using these resources provide key information for functional analysis, modeling and simulation both in individual and systematic approaches. With the long-term goal of complete understanding of a cell, we have over the past decade created a variety of clone and mutant sets for functional genomics studies of Escherichia coli K-12. We have made these experimental resources freely available to the academic community worldwide. Accordingly, these resources have now been used in numerous investigations of a multitude of cell processes. Quality control is extremely important for evaluating results generated by these resources. Because the annotation has been changed since 2005, which we originally used for the construction, we have updated these genomic resources accordingly. Here, we describe GenoBase (http://ecoli.naist.jp/GB/), which contains key information about comprehensive experimental resources of E. coli K-12, their quality control and several omics data sets generated using these resources.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25399415      PMCID: PMC4383962          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli K-12 is clearly one of the best studied organisms (1) and has had an enormous contribution on construction of concept of genes over the past half century (2). It is, however, still far from completely understood at the systems level, although complete genome structure was established and numerous functional analyses have been performed. Since the genome structure was determined, new streams of biology have come up. Omics approaches, such as cytomics (3), interactome (4), phenomics (5), proteomics (6), transcriptomics (7), etc. have been developed according to the innovation of high-throughput (HT) technologies. Simultaneously, quantitative, single cellular or single molecule analysis have emerged and become increasingly important in the field of systems biology. More and more in-depth studies of E. coli will no doubt continue to provide new, exciting insights into complete understanding the cell at the systems level as one of the model organisms. To accelerate this direction, the development of biological resources for systematic studies of E. coli K-12, like the Keio single-gene deletion collection (8) and the ASKA ORFeome clone libraries (9), has proven especially valuable worldwide. The dramatic advent of technologies for acquisition of HT data types (e.g. the network of protein–protein interactions, transcriptional and translational regulation, genetic interaction, etc.) has created a requirement to maintain and share such resources. The original purpose of GenoBase was to support the E. coli K-12 genome project launched in 1989 in Japan (10). The original data were E. coli K-12 sequence entries in GenBank and their mapping onto the chromosome (11) in printed format. GenoBase was designed to facilitate classification of sequenced and yet to be sequenced chromosomal regions for efficient sequencing project management for the conventional way of sequencing using Kohara-ordered phage clones (12). Following the completion of the genome project, GenoBase was enhanced to facilitate genome annotation. GenoBase originally displayed information for the W3110 strain of E. coli K-12 that was sequenced in the Japanese E. coli genome project (10,13–17), whereas the MG1655 strain, whose complete genome was first reported (18) has been more widely used. The single-gene Keio collection is derived from E. coli K-12 BW25113 (8) and the bar-coded deletion collection is derived from E. coli K-12 BW38028. Like MG1655, BW25113 and BW38028 are descendants of E. coli K-12 W1485. The construction of BW25113 has been reported (8). Here, we describe key information resources available at http://ecoli.naist.jp/GB for storing, sharing and retrieving information on experimental resources of the Keio single-gene deletion collection (8), the ASKA ORFeome clone library (9) and their quality control to check duplications (19). HT screening data of protein–protein interaction (20), protein localization and phenotype analysis data using BIOLOG technology (21,22) are also stored. We also briefly summarize features of the latest version of GenoBase, which is at http://ecoli.naist.jp/GB/.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE GenoBase SYSTEM

Standardization is an important issue when maintaining a database for the long term. To perform this, we used the PostgreSQL database management system and the Chado schema (23,24) for numerous different types of biological data. PostgreSQL is an open source software and one of the most widely used relational database management systems. Chado is a relational database schema designed to manage biological knowledge for a wide variety of organisms. Our database was originally started as an organism-specific genome database and was previously implemented into the same relational database management system PostgreSQL with a specific schema. Here, we switched to use the Chado schema for interoperability between databases. Figure 1 shows the Chado schema used for GenoBase. The Chado schema and its associated tools were downloaded from the GMOD web site (http://www.gmod.org). Because our target organism, E. coli K-12, is one of the eubacteria model species, some Chado tables designed for eukaryotes were not required. Therefore, the tables in Figure 1 show a subset of those in Chado. All the data in the previous version of our database were converted and stored in the PostgreSQL database using the Chado schema and View tables (Figure 2) on the Linux operating system.
Figure 1.

Chado schema in GenoBase. The portion of the Chado schema is shown that was used to realize the abstract GenoBase schema. Arrows show relationships between a Foreign Key (FK) and Primary Key (PK) of the same name in the database tables, except FK type_id in the feature and featureprop tables are connected to PK cvterm_id in the cvterm table.

Figure 2.

SQL Views in GenoBase. The GenoBase schema was built via SQL Views using the base relations in the Chado schema shown in Figure 1. Views and scripts are downloadable from the GenoBase description page.

Chado schema in GenoBase. The portion of the Chado schema is shown that was used to realize the abstract GenoBase schema. Arrows show relationships between a Foreign Key (FK) and Primary Key (PK) of the same name in the database tables, except FK type_id in the feature and featureprop tables are connected to PK cvterm_id in the cvterm table. SQL Views in GenoBase. The GenoBase schema was built via SQL Views using the base relations in the Chado schema shown in Figure 1. Views and scripts are downloadable from the GenoBase description page. Once all the data were converted into the new database, the views of the virtual data table were defined by SQL from the Chado schema. All of the SQL scripts are downloadable from the top page links of the GenoBase website (http://ecoli.naist.jp/GB/).

MAJOR PURPOSE OF GenoBase

Our database is focused on information about our comprehensively constructed experimental resources (libraries of plasmid clones, deletion mutants, etc.) and HT experimental data from a large E. coli functional genomics project that far exceeds all other resources combined. All the information in GenoBase is publicly available. Current resources include: four types of annotated Open Reading Frame (ORF) plasmid clone libraries and two types of deletion collections. The plasmid clone libraries include: the ASKA ORFeome libraries with (A) and without (B) a C-terminal GFP fusion (9,25), Gateway entry clone library (C; (25)) and the latest TransBac library (H. Dose, unpublished) as shown in Figure 3. The single-gene deletion collections include: the Keio collection (A; (8)) and a recently constructed barcode deletion collection (B) as shown in Figure 4. The Barcode deletion collection, whose manuscript is now in preparation, was originally constructed for the systematic analysis of synthetic lethal/sickness genetic interaction to make double genes knockout by combining single-gene deletion from the Keio and the barcode collection by conjugation (26,27, R. Takeuchi, unpublished). We added a further valuable feature, 20-nt molecular barcode, which makes population analysis and multiplex parallel screening of mixed cultures feasible (Y. Otsuka et al., unpublished).
Figure 3.

Structure of cloned region of ORF clone libraries. Colored boxes, red, green and blue boxes represent target ORF, eGFP and attL regions, respectively. All of ORF cloning target regions are designed from the second to the last amino acid coding region except the TransBac plasmid clone library.

Figure 4.

Genomic structure of target region of deletion collections. Two sets of deletion collections have been constructed using the same primer set. The deleted regions are the same between Keio and Barcode collections. FRT in the Keio and FRT1 of the Barcode collection are not site-specifically recombined by FLP recombinase.

Structure of cloned region of ORF clone libraries. Colored boxes, red, green and blue boxes represent target ORF, eGFP and attL regions, respectively. All of ORF cloning target regions are designed from the second to the last amino acid coding region except the TransBac plasmid clone library. Genomic structure of target region of deletion collections. Two sets of deletion collections have been constructed using the same primer set. The deleted regions are the same between Keio and Barcode collections. FRT in the Keio and FRT1 of the Barcode collection are not site-specifically recombined by FLP recombinase.

INFORMATION ON NEW AND FUTURE RESOURCES

Information on new resources to be constructed in the future and the data from HT experiments will be disseminated, shared and publicized via GenoBase. Currently, our small RNA deletion collection with or without a barcode, chromosomal Venus-GFP fusion strains, antibodies against purified E. coli proteins are being prepared for dissemination.

INFORMATION ON THE QUALITY CONTROL OF EXPERIMENTAL RESOURCES

GenoBase provides not only information about resources constructed in our lab and HT experimental data using these resources, but also information on quality control of these resources. Both the Keio and barcode single-gene deletion collections include two independent mutants of every non-essential gene. As we noted in our original report of the Keio collection (8), gene amplification during construction can result in mutants containing both the correct gene deletion and a copy of the targeted gene elsewhere. It was therefore important to validate the deletion collections not only for the presence of novel, expected junction fragments but also for absence of the targeted gene (19). By testing for absence of a genetic duplication, we verified absence of the targeted gene in at least one of the two mutants for 98.3% of the Keio collection mutants. It is notable that Giaever et al. (28) reported a similar percentage of yeast deletion mutants with partial duplications. Such gene amplifications have been shown to occur frequently following generalized transduction in bacteria (29–31) as well as spontaneously (32–36). Compensatory mutations can also arise during mutant construction, especially among mutants showing a deleterious effect, regardless of whether the organism is a virus, a prokaryote or eukaryote (37). To circumvent problems and misinterpretations that happen from HT screening of collections in which a small number of mutants may have duplications or compensatory mutations, we routinely examine both Keio collection mutants for a particular gene. Whenever we find ambiguous results, we construct and test additional mutants. We have found that the simplest method for construction of additional mutants is to generate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products on the deletion mutant as template and primes flanking the deleted gene. Importantly, the introduction of PCR products for the gene deletion greater than 100 to 200 base pairs of flanking homology into a new strain harboring the Red system (38) yields huge numbers of recombinants and is far more efficient and reliable than generalized transduction (39). Our initial resource included types of ASKA plasmid clone libraries, whose construction was based on the genome annotation of E. coli K-12 from 1997. Annotation policy at that time was lacking and sometimes included the wrong initiation codon. After completing the construction of the first version of the ASKA clone libraries, we participated in annotation jamborees organized by the late Monica Riley at the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, where we completed new annotations of E. coli K-12 MG1655 and W3110 which were based on updated and highly accurate genome sequences of E. coli K-12 MG1655 and W3110 (40) The resulting annotation corrections led us to re-construct ASKA clones encoding ca.1000 ORFs. Accordingly, the current ASKA plasmid clone libraries consists of more than 5000 plasmid clones. Histories and precise information about the methods for construction of each of the resources can be downloaded from the GenoBase website (http://ecoli.naist.jp/GB/). Notably, the original sources of genomic DNAs differ for each of the resources. The ASKA plasmid clone libraries were originally constructed using the Kohara clone phages (12) as DNA sources for PCR amplification. The Gateway-fitted entry clone library was based on the ASKA plasmid clones, except for about 100 target genes, which failed to be isolated by SfiI cloning from the original clones as described in detail elsewhere (25). The newly designed TransBac library follows the latest annotation of the MG1655 and E. coli K- BW38028 genomic DNA for PCR amplification. The Keio deletion collection mutants were using E. coli K-12 BW25113 as parent and the Barcode deletion collection mutants were constructed in E. coli K-12 BW38028. Due to use of different annotations, we computed differences between the positions of the target genes on the chromosome from the primer set and the latest annotation of GenBank. For the plasmid clone libraries, DN (Difference of N-terminus) and DC (Difference of C-terminus) were calculated as given in Figure 6 (A) and (B). For the deletion collection, in addition to DN and DC, UL (Upstream Length) and DL (Downstream Length) were determined. Also, in the case of complete overlap with the neighbor genes, PD (Partial Deletion) and CD (Complete Deletion) were evaluated as illustrated in Figure 6 (C).
Figure 6.

Differences with annotation. Each of resource pages for target gene shows inconsistency if it exists. (A) ASKA GFP(+), ASKA GFP(−) and Gateway entry clone validation. (B) TransBac library. (C) Keio and Barcode deletion collections.

Flowchart of evaluation by the latest GenBank annotation. All of resources are generated by DNA primers, which are designed according to the latest annotation at the time of construction. Differences with annotation. Each of resource pages for target gene shows inconsistency if it exists. (A) ASKA GFP(+), ASKA GFP(−) and Gateway entry clone validation. (B) TransBac library. (C) Keio and Barcode deletion collections. Confirmation of the E. coli K-12 MG1655 and W3110 genome sequences has been previously performed (15), yet some sequencing errors may exist. Confirmation of the host strains E. coli K-12 BW25113 and BW38028 (BW38029 is an independent isolate) of the Keio and barcode single-deletion collections, by deep sequencing has now been completed (Y. Otsuka et al., unpublished). Currently, we are completing the annotation of these strains, which will be reported elsewhere and made publicly available through GenoBase. Changing the annotation, especially changing the gene location, is influential for making libraries. Databases, e.g. EcoGene (41), EcoCyc (42) and PEC (43) are frequently updated. We would like to keep the GenoBase experimental resources updated according to such latest information. However, in practice, it is not easy to achieve. At the least, we can calculate their inconsistency between the design and the latest annotation. Finally, when constructing target resources, sometimes unpredicted biological events may happen, such as transposition, duplication, integration, introducing mutations, etc. Other possibilities result from the primer sequences. For the Keio collection, we performed genome confirmation by PCR amplification between antibiotic resistance fragments replaced with the target gene and upstream or downstream genes. Even though the PCR evaluation showed predicted genomic structure, we realized the existence of another wild-type copy of the target gene somewhere on the chromosome. So, we tested all of the Keio collection strains to detect such duplication, as reported elsewhere (19). In some cases, suppressor mutations may occur elsewhere on the chromosome during or after deletion or cloning. While it is possible to test such possibilities experimentally, it is technically not practical. Whether this can be achieved via community-level activities with PortEco (44) has yet to be shown. Community annotation has had success for some bacteria genera in the ASAP information resource (45,46) (http://asap.ahabs.wisc.edu/asap/home.php), but it has had limited success in the E. coli community. As mentioned above, all of our resources depend on the primers designed according to the latest annotation at the time. So, we performed calculation of differences between the design and the annotation inconsistency. Evaluation scheme is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Flowchart of evaluation by the latest GenBank annotation. All of resources are generated by DNA primers, which are designed according to the latest annotation at the time of construction.

DATA RETRIEVAL AND CONTENTS IN GenoBase

GenoBase is a searchable web database system devoted to systems biology of E. coli. Querying GenoBase is done from the top page. Any word, such as an id, gene name, product name and sequence are available, and the direct searching system by SQL is also provided. Searching results are shown as a table format with links to resource pages. The methods used for quality control of our resources are shown in Figure 6. On each web page, the left panel shows the information on the latest annotation basically from GenBank database entry (see Figure 7). The second and third tabs show sequences of the target genes and bioinformatics analysis of them. Currently, six tabs are available for six different resources.
Figure 7.

Sample screen images. (A) Sample pages of plasmid clone libraries. Schematic view of inconsistency and cloned region of target genes in nucleotide level. (B) Schematic view of deletion collection. (C) Omics results of each of the target gene. (D) BIOLOG phenotype analysis results in global, gene and plate level view.

Sample screen images. (A) Sample pages of plasmid clone libraries. Schematic view of inconsistency and cloned region of target genes in nucleotide level. (B) Schematic view of deletion collection. (C) Omics results of each of the target gene. (D) BIOLOG phenotype analysis results in global, gene and plate level view. For the Keio and the Barcode deletion collection, in the case of four base overlap with the upstream gene, special case has no influence for the correct termination of the upstream gene shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Overlap with no influence. In the case of 4 nt (ATGA) overlap between the target and the upstream genes, the termination codon of the upstream gene is re-generated in deletion strain.

Overlap with no influence. In the case of 4 nt (ATGA) overlap between the target and the upstream genes, the termination codon of the upstream gene is re-generated in deletion strain. Another tab shows omics output using our resources. Systematic experimental data currently includes three data sets. Protein–protein interaction data are based on using His-tagged ASKA ORF clone library without GFP (20). All of the interaction data including data produced by Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOF-MASS) analysis are stored and specific partner candidates as prey proteins are available from each target protein as bait. DNA microarray analysis of about 150 single-gene deletion mutants, mostly for ones lacking transcription factors, quantified by ImaGene for deletion mutants are also stored. These data are downloadable from the link as tab-limited text format files. Images of protein localization analyzed by the GFP-tagged ASKA ORFeome clones are available. E. coli cells, without isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) to avoid misfolding, were analyzed by fluorescent microscopy. Images captured with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera are also available. Phenotype microarray analysis by BIOLOG plates (47,48) are shown graphically. Currently, about 300 data sets using single-gene knockout of the Keio collection are available (21,22). Our BIOLOG phenotype screening data have been produced by 10 times wild-type strain tests as a control and duplicate tests for each of target gene deletion strains. The screenings were performed using PM1 to PM20 both for metabolic and chemical sensitivity tests (http://www.biolog.com/pmMicrobialCells.shtml). Other omics type results will be added and made downloadable from the GenoBase system when we obtain them. Currently, comprehensive genetic interaction data, population dynamics using the Barcode deletion collection, in addition to the simple growth condition measured by our latest colony quantification system (49) are scheduled to be opened.

RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION

Current official distribution site is NIG (the National Institute of Genetics, Mishima http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/ecoli/strain/), supported by the National Bioresource Project (40). Currently, we have four types of predicted ORF plasmid clone libraries and two of them have been distributed from NIG. The Gateway entry clone library will start soon to distribute to the academy side. We also have efforts to open our new resources timely as much as possible. For deletion construct, only Keio collection (8) is now available from NIG and we would like to make the Barcode deletion collection publicly available as soon as possible.

POLICY OF THE MANAGEMENT OF GenoBase

Assignment of annotation onto the genome is not our main task. The annotation information on genes depends on GenBank database entry. The major purpose of GenoBase is to provide information related to resources constructed by our group for the community to investigate E. coli K-12 as a model cell system. We are also producing omics data to understand what a cell system is. We hope experimental resources, their information and omics results from these resources may contribute in the community using E. coli as a model system.
  49 in total

1.  The coupon collector and the suppressor mutation: estimating the number of compensatory mutations by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Art Poon; Bradley H Davis; Lin Chao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the physical map.

Authors:  K E Rudd
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (a complete set of E. coli K-12 ORF archive): unique resources for biological research.

Authors:  Masanari Kitagawa; Takeshi Ara; Mohammad Arifuzzaman; Tomoko Ioka-Nakamichi; Eiji Inamoto; Hiromi Toyonaga; Hirotada Mori
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Large-scale identification of protein-protein interaction of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Mohammad Arifuzzaman; Maki Maeda; Aya Itoh; Kensaku Nishikata; Chiharu Takita; Rintaro Saito; Takeshi Ara; Kenji Nakahigashi; Hsuan-Cheng Huang; Aki Hirai; Kohei Tsuzuki; Seira Nakamura; Mohammad Altaf-Ul-Amin; Taku Oshima; Tomoya Baba; Natsuko Yamamoto; Tomoyo Kawamura; Tomoko Ioka-Nakamichi; Masanari Kitagawa; Masaru Tomita; Shigehiko Kanaya; Chieko Wada; Hirotada Mori
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Profiling of Escherichia coli Chromosome database.

Authors:  Yukiko Yamazaki; Hironori Niki; Jun-ichi Kato
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

6.  A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information.

Authors:  Christopher J Mungall; David B Emmert
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Escherichia coli K-12: a cooperatively developed annotation snapshot--2005.

Authors:  Monica Riley; Takashi Abe; Martha B Arnaud; Mary K B Berlyn; Frederick R Blattner; Roy R Chaudhuri; Jeremy D Glasner; Takashi Horiuchi; Ingrid M Keseler; Takehide Kosuge; Hirotada Mori; Nicole T Perna; Guy Plunkett; Kenneth E Rudd; Margrethe H Serres; Gavin H Thomas; Nicholas R Thomson; David Wishart; Barry L Wanner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Highly accurate genome sequences of Escherichia coli K-12 strains MG1655 and W3110.

Authors:  Koji Hayashi; Naoki Morooka; Yoshihiro Yamamoto; Katsutoshi Fujita; Katsumi Isono; Sunju Choi; Eiichi Ohtsubo; Tomoya Baba; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori; Takashi Horiuchi
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection.

Authors:  Tomoya Baba; Takeshi Ara; Miki Hasegawa; Yuki Takai; Yoshiko Okumura; Miki Baba; Kirill A Datsenko; Masaru Tomita; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  High-throughput, quantitative analyses of genetic interactions in E. coli.

Authors:  Athanasios Typas; Robert J Nichols; Deborah A Siegele; Michael Shales; Sean R Collins; Bentley Lim; Hannes Braberg; Natsuko Yamamoto; Rikiya Takeuchi; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori; Jonathan S Weissman; Nevan J Krogan; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  14 in total

1.  A New Natural Product Analog of Blasticidin S Reveals Cellular Uptake Facilitated by the NorA Multidrug Transporter.

Authors:  Jack R Davison; Katheryn M Lohith; Xiaoning Wang; Kostyantyn Bobyk; Sivakoteswara R Mandadapu; Su-Lin Lee; Regina Cencic; Justin Nelson; Scott Simpkins; Karen M Frank; Jerry Pelletier; Chad L Myers; Jeff Piotrowski; Harold E Smith; Carole A Bewley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  The 2015 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and molecular biology database collection.

Authors:  Michael Y Galperin; Daniel J Rigden; Xosé M Fernández-Suárez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Bacterial retrons encode phage-defending tripartite toxin-antitoxin systems.

Authors:  Karin Mitosch; André Mateus; Jacob Bobonis; Nicolai Karcher; George Kritikos; Joel Selkrig; Matylda Zietek; Vivian Monzon; Birgit Pfalz; Sarela Garcia-Santamarina; Marco Galardini; Anna Sueki; Callie Kobayashi; Frank Stein; Alex Bateman; Georg Zeller; Mikhail M Savitski; Johanna R Elfenbein; Helene L Andrews-Polymenis; Athanasios Typas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Single-Cell Analysis of the Dps Response to Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Michela De Martino; Dmitry Ershov; Peter J van den Berg; Sander J Tans; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Databases for Microbiologists.

Authors:  Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The magnesium transporter A is activated by cardiolipin and is highly sensitive to free magnesium in vitro.

Authors:  Saranya Subramani; Harmonie Perdreau-Dahl; Jens Preben Morth
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Phenotype inference in an Escherichia coli strain panel.

Authors:  Marco Galardini; Alexandra Koumoutsi; Lucia Herrera-Dominguez; Juan Antonio Cordero Varela; Anja Telzerow; Omar Wagih; Morgane Wartel; Olivier Clermont; Erick Denamur; Athanasios Typas; Pedro Beltrao
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Accumulation of heme biosynthetic intermediates contributes to the antibacterial action of the metalloid tellurite.

Authors:  Eduardo H Morales; Camilo A Pinto; Roberto Luraschi; Claudia M Muñoz-Villagrán; Fabián A Cornejo; Scott W Simpkins; Justin Nelson; Felipe A Arenas; Jeff S Piotrowski; Chad L Myers; Hirotada Mori; Claudio C Vásquez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Genomewide phenotypic analysis of growth, cell morphogenesis, and cell cycle events in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Manuel Campos; Sander K Govers; Irnov Irnov; Genevieve S Dobihal; François Cornet; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria.

Authors:  Lisa Maier; Mihaela Pruteanu; Michael Kuhn; Georg Zeller; Anja Telzerow; Exene Erin Anderson; Ana Rita Brochado; Keith Conrad Fernandez; Hitomi Dose; Hirotada Mori; Kiran Raosaheb Patil; Peer Bork; Athanasios Typas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.