| Literature DB >> 25399059 |
Zhi-Hua Lv, Pei Ma, Wan Luo, Hui Xiong, Lu Han, Si-Wei Li, Xin Zhou1, Jian-Cheng Tu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Free fatty acids (FFAs) play importance roles in the development of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. We measured serum FFA levels from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and assay the correlation between serum FFA levels and related factors. The present study was undertaken to investigate a possible relation between the changes in serum free fatty acid concentration with acute myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25399059 PMCID: PMC4236447 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Figure 1The change of FFA levels with different storing temperature and time. The histogram showed FFA levels (A) 4△represents stored at 4°C 4 h, others stored at room temperature .Scatter plots show relationships of storing time (h) and serum FFA (B). ***P < .001, paired t-test: compared to room temperature 1 h. ###P < .001, paired t-test: compared to 4°C 4 h. The dotted line was a virtual-line.
Figure 2The change of FFA levels in different age. FFA levels (A) and BMI (B) in different group. ANOVA was followed by SNK-q test to determine differences between individual groups; Data are mean ± SD (N.S.: no statistically significant.
The FFA levels between sexes
| Sex | Age (y) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 20 ~ 50 | n | 50 ~ 60 | n | 60~ | |
| Male | 145 | 2.60 ± 0.16 | 56 | 2.65 ± 0.18 | 75 | 2.72 ± 0.18 |
| Female | 153 | 2.61 ± 0.16 | 55 | 2.65 ± 0.19 | 56 | 2.73 ± 0.17 |
Independent-Samples T Test.
Baseline characteristics
| Control group | T2DM | AMI | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 71.0 ± 6.6 | 70.9 ± 7.3 | 71.3 ± 7.0 |
|
| 81 (56.6%) | 24 (46.2%) | 24 (51.1%) |
|
| 22.5 ± 2.6 | 23.5 ± 2.3** | 22.3 ± 3.0 |
|
| 15 (10.6%) | 9 (17.0%) | 22 (46.8%) |
|
| 20 (17,25) | 23 (19,29)** | 23 (19,31)## |
|
| 25 (22,28) | 23 (18,29) ** | 25 (21,30) |
|
| 4.31 ± 0.59 | 4.59 ± 1.03* | 4.40 ± 0.90 |
|
| 1.12 ± 0.33 | 2.02 ± 1.29*** | 1.63 ± 0.88### |
|
| 1.30 ± 0.22 | 0.96 ± 0.18*** | 1.00 ± 0.22### |
|
| 2.35 ± 0.46 | 2.37 ± 0.77 | 2.25 ± 0.75 |
|
| 4.90 ± 0.49 | 7.75 ± 2.95*** | 5.78 ± 1.32### |
|
| 5.50 ± 1.28 | 5.78 ± 3.13 | 6.22 ± 2.82# |
|
| 281.3 ± 68.2 | 316.2 ± 96.9* | 366.3 ± 171.7### |
|
| 41.6 ± 3.6 | 38.5 ± 5.2*** | 38.8 ± 4.9### |
|
| 6.15 ± 1.60 | 7.30 ± 3.78** | 7.12 ± 2.41# |
|
| 178.7 ± 49.0 | 180.8 ± 63.0 | 182.0 ± 74.0 |
|
| 71.1 ± 6.0 | 67.4 ± 6.0* | 66.5 ± 6.6## |
|
| 551.6 (403.0,679.7) | 536.5 (412.6,666.3)*** | 441.0 (298.5,625.0) |
Data are presented as mean ± SD, in a normal distribution of data, or as median (inter quartile range), in a skewed distribution of data.
*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001for the T2DM group vs. the control group.
#P <0.5, ##P < .01, ###P < .001 for the AMI group vs. the control group.
Figure 3The description of six mainly levels in T2DM, AMI and control group. The histogram showed six mainly levels [TG (A), HDL (B), LDL (C), GLU (D), AST (E), FFAs (F)] Data are mean ± SD. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001; Three groups: Control (n = 143), T2DM (n = 52), AMI (n = 47).
Stepwise multivariable regression model of the serum FFA levels
| Males, n (%) | Age (y) | Log (FFA) | FFA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | P-value | ||||
|
| 145 (48.7%) | 39.3 ± 8.6 | 2.61 ± 0.16 | ||
|
| 0.28 | P < .001 | |||
|
| 81 (56.6%) | 71.0 ± 6.6 | 2.72 ± 0.16 | ||
|
| 0.26 | P = 0.002 | |||
|
| 24 (46.2%) | 70.9 ± 7.3 | 2.72 ± 0.13 | ||
|
| 0.36 | P = 0.01 | |||
|
| 24 (51.1%) | 71.3 ± 7.0 | 2.64 ± 0.22 | ||
|
| 0.49 | P = 0.005 | |||