Literature DB >> 25397800

Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.

Mariano Herrero-Climent, Manuel María Romero Ruiz, Carmen María Díaz-Castro, Pedro Bullón, Jose Vincente Ríos-Santos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate crestal bone level changes radiographically in a standardized fashion over a period of 12 months in humans for implants with a 0.7-mm machined collar (implant type A) versus type B implants with a 1.5-mm machined collar.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with multiple missing teeth in posterior sectors were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: A (0.7-mm machined-collar implants) or B (1.5-mm machined-collar implants). Changes at crestal bone level were assessed by measuring the shoulder-crest distance (SCD) on the mesial and distal aspects of each implant on customized periapical radiographs, which were taken on the day of surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Eighty-one implants were included in the study. Mean SCD was 0.54 ± 0.53 mm at baseline and 1.49 ± 0.40 mm after 12 months. For 0.7-mm-collar implants, mean SCD was 1.40 ± 0.39 mm, while it was 1.56 ± 0.40 mm for 1.5-mm-collar implants. Statistically significant differences were found only between the two types of implants for distal measurements at 3 and 12 months after placement.
CONCLUSION: Both 0.7- and 1.5-mm machined-collar implants can be used with predictable results, as changes in peri-implant crestal bone levels are similar for both implant types and do not seem to be significant from a clinical point of view. The SCD may well depend more on the location of the abutment-implant interface than on machined-collar height.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25397800     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading.

Authors:  Mai Ahmed Yousry El-Sheikh; Tamer Mohamed Nasr Mostafa; Mohamed Maamoun El-Sheikh
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study.

Authors:  José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Gregorio Tello-González; Pedro Lázaro-Calvo; Francisco Javier Gil Mur; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Logistic Regression Analysis of the Factors Involved in the Failure of Osseointegration and Survival of Dental Implants with an Internal Connection and Machined Collar: A 6-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Ángel Álvarez-Arenal; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Iker Bellanco-De La Pinta; Héctor De Llanos-Lanchares; Ignacio González-González; Carolina Larrazábal-Morón
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Does the Laser-Microtextured Short Implant Collar Design Reduce Marginal Bone Loss in Comparison with a Machined Collar?

Authors:  B Alper Gultekin; Ali Sirali; Pinar Gultekin; Serdar Yalcin; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saverio Cosola; Simone Marconcini; Michela Boccuzzi; Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris; Ugo Covani; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.