Wissam Haj-Ali1, Lama Bou Karroum2, Nabil Natafgi3, Kassem Kassak2. 1. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 3. Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is one of the vital attributes to consider when evaluating the impact of accreditation systems. This study aimed to explore the impact of the national accreditation system in Lebanon on patient satisfaction. METHODS: An explanatory cross-sectional study of six hospitals in Lebanon. Patient satisfaction was measured using the SERVQUAL tool assessing five dimensions of quality (reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness). Independent variables included hospital accreditation scores, size, location (rural/urban), and patient demographics. RESULTS: The majority of patients (76.34%) were unsatisfied with the quality of services. There was no statistically significant association between accreditation classification and patient satisfaction. However, the tangibility dimension - reflecting hospital structural aspects such as physical facility and equipment was found to be associated with patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study brings to light the importance of embracing more adequate patient satisfaction measures in the Lebanese hospital accreditation standards. Furthermore, the findings reinforce the importance of weighing the patient perspective in the development and implementation of accreditation systems. As accreditation is not the only driver of patient satisfaction, hospitals are encouraged to adopt complementary means of promoting patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND:Patient satisfaction is one of the vital attributes to consider when evaluating the impact of accreditation systems. This study aimed to explore the impact of the national accreditation system in Lebanon on patient satisfaction. METHODS: An explanatory cross-sectional study of six hospitals in Lebanon. Patient satisfaction was measured using the SERVQUAL tool assessing five dimensions of quality (reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness). Independent variables included hospital accreditation scores, size, location (rural/urban), and patient demographics. RESULTS: The majority of patients (76.34%) were unsatisfied with the quality of services. There was no statistically significant association between accreditation classification and patient satisfaction. However, the tangibility dimension - reflecting hospital structural aspects such as physical facility and equipment was found to be associated with patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study brings to light the importance of embracing more adequate patient satisfaction measures in the Lebanese hospital accreditation standards. Furthermore, the findings reinforce the importance of weighing the patient perspective in the development and implementation of accreditation systems. As accreditation is not the only driver of patient satisfaction, hospitals are encouraged to adopt complementary means of promoting patient satisfaction.
Authors: Jaap van den Heuvel; Ad J J C Bogers; Ronald J M M Does; Sandra L van Dijk; Marc Berg Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2006 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 0.926
Authors: Viktor Dombrádi; Barnabás Margitai; Csaba Dózsa; Orsolya Karola Bárdos-Csenteri; János Sándor; Tibor Gáll; Sándor Gődény Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Heba H Hijazi; Heather L Harvey; Mohammad S Alyahya; Hussam A Alshraideh; Rabah M Al Abdi; Sanjai K Parahoo Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730