Literature DB >> 25395960

A novel noninvasive assessment of hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal pressure computed from computed tomography angiography.

Xiaolong Qi1, Fangyu Zhou2, Huijie Lv3, Huisong Chen1, Weiguo Xu4, Surong Xing4, Fei Wang1, Changqing Yang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25395960      PMCID: PMC4223149          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2014.46224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


× No keyword cloud information.
Cirrhosis is a severe and common digestive disease worldwide and is associated with a poor outcome. Portal hypertension (PHT) is a frequently encountered complication in cirrhotic patients [1-3]. Therefore, evaluation of portal pressure (PP) is urgently needed for the grading and staging of PHT. Direct measurement of PP is rarely performed due to significant invasiveness and potential complications. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently treated as the “gold standard” [1-4]. However, the invasiveness and technical difficulty greatly restrict its repeatable application. An index computed from computed tomography angiography (CTA) has recently demonstrated its diagnostic value compared with the “gold standard” [5, 6]. For instance, fractional flow reserve from coronary CTA showed good performance in the diagnosis of functional coronary stenosis in a multicenter randomized clinical controlled trial on 159 vessels in 103 patients [6]. On the basis of our previous study of noninvasive measurement of coronary stenosis by fractional flow reserve [7], this study, for the first time, introduces a novel noninvasive assessment of HVPG (HVPGni) and PP (PPni) computed from three dimensional (3D) hepatic portal venous models reconstructed from CTA to diagnose the severity of PHT in cirrhotic patients. The patient enrolled in the pilot study was a 50-year-old man who showed visible clinical manifestations of PHT, such as ascites and splenomegaly, and was diagnosed with cirrhosis in the decompensated stage. Approval was obtained from the ethical committees of Tongji Hospital and the participant gave written informed consent in advance. The CTA was performed with multi-detector CT scanners (GE Light-Speed Ultra, 120 kV, 220 mA). Original images were spilt into thin layers and exported into imaging control software MIMICS10.0. 3D hepatic portal venous models were reconstructed from surrounding tissues by different CT values, which were then meshed with 3D Flotran elements in the software ANSYS11.0. Given boundary conditions including average velocity of hepatic venous and portal venous flow were measured by color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) (Philips iU22 x MATRIX Ultrasound System, convex array probe C5-2). Afterwards, finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics were applied to compute the pressure distribution in the hepatic portal vein in vitro. Clinical data of the decompensated cirrhotic patient were calculated to test the feasibility and accuracy of the novel noninvasive assessment with the clinical diagnosis, CTA and CDUS as reference standards. The CTA images showed that the diameter of the portal vein was 1.6 cm while the normal diameter is ≤ 1.3 cm [2, 3]. Besides, the average velocity of portal venous flow was 12.5 cm/s, which was obviously slower than 22.62 cm/s in normal patients [1, 3, 4] and indicated severe PHT. According to the calculation by the novel assessment, HVPGni and PPni were computed as 65.2 Pa (Figure 1) and 3535.0 Pa (Figure 2), which generally corresponded to the diagnosis of PHT. Furthermore, the pressure and velocity distribution of different sections could be simultaneously obtained.
Figure 1

Noninvasive assessment of hepatic ve- 702.835 1493.68 2284.52 3075.36 3866.2 nous pressure gradient in decompensated cirrhosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was calculated in vitro with the value of 65.2 Pa

Figure 2

Noninvasive assessment of portal pressure in decompensated cirrhosis. Portal pressure was quantified in vitro as 3535.0 Pa and was generally consistent with the clinical diagnosis of portal hypertension

Noninvasive assessment of hepatic ve- 702.835 1493.68 2284.52 3075.36 3866.2 nous pressure gradient in decompensated cirrhosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was calculated in vitro with the value of 65.2 Pa Noninvasive assessment of portal pressure in decompensated cirrhosis. Portal pressure was quantified in vitro as 3535.0 Pa and was generally consistent with the clinical diagnosis of portal hypertension The PHT is known as a frequent complication of cirrhosis worldwide which significantly reduces the patient's quality of life. The HVPG is currently considered as the “gold standard” to identify PHT. However, shortcomings, such as invasiveness and technical difficulty, limit its diagnostic worth greatly. In the pilot study, finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics over the 3D hepatic portal venous model were applied, which potentially developed a novel noninvasive assessment of HVPGni and PPni to evaluate the severity of PHT. Besides, the novel assessment was successfully applied and the diagnostic performance of HVPGni and PPni was overall consistent with the clinical diagnosis, CTA and CDUS. This study introduces, for the first time, a novel noninvasive assessment of HVPGni and PPni computed from hepatic portal venous models, which might be a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the severity of PHT, grading of cirrhosis and choice of treatment in the future. However, large randomized clinical controlled trials evaluated by both the novel assessment and invasive “gold standard” are needed before the application from bench to bedside.
  7 in total

1.  Non invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  F Vizzutti; U Arena; L Rega; M Pinzani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2008-09

Review 2.  Noninvasive assessment of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Dominique Thabut; Richard Moreau; Didier Lebrec
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.

Authors:  Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Joon-Hyung Doh; David V Daniels; Sanda Jegere; Hyo-Soo Kim; Allison Dunning; Tony DeFrance; Alexandra Lansky; Jonathan Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Assessment of intrahepatic blood flow by Doppler ultrasonography: relationship between the hepatic vein, portal vein, hepatic artery and portal pressure measured intraoperatively in patients with portal hypertension.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Jikai Yin; Yunyou Duan; Yilin Yang; Lijun Yuan; Tiesheng Cao
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Jaime Bosch; Juan G Abraldes; Annalisa Berzigotti; Juan Carlos García-Pagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Common hepatic artery arising from the aorta - demonstration with multidetector CT angiography and its clinical importance.

Authors:  Mustafa Koplay; Mecit Kantarci
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  A novel noninvasive method for measuring fractional flow reserve through three-dimensional modeling.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Huijie Lv; Fangyu Zhou; Jiangmin Zhao; Jiahong Xu; Li Xiang; Fei Wang; Qing Zhan; Jinfa Jiang; Junjie Xiao
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Staging of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: The role of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement.

Authors:  Ki Tae Suk; Dong Joon Kim
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 2.  HVPG signature: A prognostic and predictive tool in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Xin Zhang; Zhijia Li; Jialiang Hui; Yi Xiang; Jinjun Chen; Jianbo Zhao; Jing Li; Fu-Zhen Qi; Yong Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Assessment of a biofluid mechanics-based model for calculating portal pressure in canines.

Authors:  Jia-Yun Lin; Chi-Hao Zhang; Lei Zheng; Chen-Lu Song; Wen-Sheng Deng; Yi-Ming Zhu; Li Zheng; Li-Zhong Wu; Long-Ci Sun; Meng Luo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.741

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.