| Literature DB >> 25395950 |
Hristina Colovic1, Lidija Dimitrijevic2, Ivona Stankovic2, Dejan Nikolic3, Dragana Radovic-Janosevic4, Dragoljub Zivanovic5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) with physical therapy on dynamic foot equinus correction and higher motor functional outcome in children with spastic type of cerebral palsy (CP).Entities:
Keywords: botulinum toxin; cerebral palsy; dynamic equines
Year: 2014 PMID: 25395950 PMCID: PMC4223142 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2014.46217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Motion mean values and statistical interpretation of active foot dorsiflexion
| Period |
|
| Significance | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 16 | (–)13.07 ±5.78 | (–)16.41–(–)9.73 | ||
| After BTA-ABO treatment: | |||||
| 3 weeks | 16 | 4.29 ±5.08 |
| 1.36–7.22 | |
| 8 weeks | 16 | 10.86 ±4.87 |
| 8.05–13.67 | |
| 16 weeks | 16 | 7.71 ±4.38 |
| 5.19–10.24 | |
| 6 months | 16 | (–)10.64 ±4.77 |
| (–)13.39–(–)7.89 |
Student's t-test
Wilcoxon signed ranks test, N – number of extremities
Motion mean values and statistical interpretation of passive foot dorsiflexion
| Period |
|
| Significance | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 16 | 4.21 ±2.29 | 2.89–5.54 | ||
| After BTA-ABO treatment: | |||||
| 3 weeks | 16 | 14.64 ±3.13 |
| 12.84–16.45 | |
| 8 weeks | 16 | 15.36 ±4.18 |
| 12.94–17.77 | |
| 16 weeks | 16 | 13.07 ±4.23 |
| 10.63–15.52 | |
| 6 months | 16 | 4.71 ±2.16 |
| 3.47–5.96 |
Student's t-test
Wilcoxon signed ranks test, N – number of extremities
Comparison of frequency of ankle extensors spasticity level according to MAS
| Level of spasticity | Before treatment | After BTA-ABO treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 weeks | 8 weeks | 16 weeks | 6 months | ||
| 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0 |
| 1 + | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Value of | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | NS | |
Pearson χ 2 test
The GMFM-D scores in evaluated group of patients before and after BTA-ABO application
| Period |
|
| Significance | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 12 | 68.64 ±14.67 | 64.07–73.21 | ||
| After treatment: | |||||
| 3 weeks | 12 | 75.59 ±12.76 |
| 71.62–79.57 | |
| 8 weeks | 12 | 82.64 ±12.90 |
| 78.62–86.65 | |
| 16 weeks | 12 | 87.25 ±11.63 |
| 83.62–90.87 | |
| 6 months | 12 | 71.59 ±15.14 |
| 66.87–76.31 |
Wilcoxon signed ranks test, N – number of subjects
The GMFM-E scores in evaluated group of patients before and after BTA-ABO application
| Period |
|
| Significance | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 12 | 55.49 ±20.87 | 48.99–61.99 | ||
| After treatment: | |||||
| 3 weeks | 12 | 62.52 ±19.06 |
| 56.58–68.46 | |
| 8 weeks | 12 | 70.83 ±18.57 |
| 65.05–76.62 | |
| 16 weeks | 12 | 77.00 ±16.07 |
| 71.99–82.01 | |
| 6 months | 12 | 58.15 ±20.35 | 51.81–64.49 |
Student's t-test
Wilcoxon signed ranks test, N – number of subjects