| Literature DB >> 25395905 |
Mahshid Naghashpour1, Ghodratollah Shakerinejad2, Mohammad Reza Lourizadeh2, Saeedeh Hajinajaf2, Farzaneh Jarvandi2.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of a nutrition education programme based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) on knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of dietary calcium in female students. In this interventional study, 188 students were placed into intervention (95) and control (93) groups. The intervention group participated in a nutrition education programme. Students in both the groups completed KAP and food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at baseline and after two and three months of follow-up respectively. The data were analyzed by independent and paired t-tests. Those who received the intervention were found to have better attitude (p=0.049) and practice (p=0.005) scores compared to the controls. The HBM constructs, including perceived susceptibility (p=0.006), perceived severity (p=0.001), perceived benefits (p=0.002), perceived barriers (p=0.001), and taking health action (p=0.02) scores, were also significantly higher. The findings support the effectiveness of nutrition education based on the HBM in improving the knowledge, attitude, and practice relating to calcium intake among adolescent students.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium intake; Health belief model; Nutrition education; Students
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25395905 PMCID: PMC4221448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Lesson plan of nutrition education
| Session title | Contents |
|---|---|
| Principles of proper nutrition |
Definition of food and its general function in the body Food requirements (energy and nutrients) Food guide pyramid concept |
| Food-groups |
Nutrient contents (energy, calcium, protein, etc.) in a serving Daily dietary requirements for female adolescents |
| Calcium |
Importance and function of dietary calcium for the body Dietary reference intake in adolescence Food sources and intake Promoting to eat locally-available foods rich in calcium and how to identify calcium-rich foods in the locality The role of calcium intake in controlling the disease Deficiency symptoms and complications Poor dietary habits, like carbonated beverages consumption relating to insufficiency of dietary calcium intake |
| Factors that increase and decrease the gastrointestinal absorption of calcium |
The role of dietary fibre, fat, vitamin D, oxalic acid, lactose, drugs, and diseases relating to malabsorption Factors increasing the calcium excretion (physical activity and menopause) The role of media and fast foods Tendency to non-pet foods and the importance of calcium intake in adolescents The role of milk and dairy products |
| Vitamin D |
Role in calcium absorption and metabolism Deficiency symptoms Sources (the role of direct sunlight as one of the main sources of vitamin D) Recommendations for vitamin D supply |
| Milk and dairy products as a major source of dietary calcium |
Nutrient contents (micro- and macronutrients) in a serving Daily dietary requirements for female-adolescents |
| Yogurt | Nutrient contents (micro- and macronutrients) in a serving Beneficial effects The role in dietary calcium supply |
| Review |
In the final session, the materials presented in the past sessions were recounted and summarized through a question-and-answer session |
Relationship between the HBM with improvement of dietary calcium intake
| HBM construct | Implement in the nutrition education intervention |
| Perceived susceptibility | Students’ belief that they are threaded to calcium deficiency complications when they take an inadequate amount of dietary calcium |
| Perceived severity | Knowledge and beliefs on the consequences of inadequate intake of dietary calcium, including rickets, osteomalacia, bone fractures, osteoporosis in the future, disability, obesity, and hypertension |
| Perceived benefits and perceived barriers | Improvement of musculoskeletal strength, the possession of good self-esteem, and a sense of well-being, and prevention of low backpain, hypertension, and obesity |
| Taking health-related action | Increasing dietary calcium intake |
Demographic characteristics of the female students of junior high schools, who participated in nutrition education programme-based on Health Belief Model in Ahwaz, Iran, in 2010-2011*
| Demographic characteristics | Intervention (n=95) | Control (n=93) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | (14.55) (0.7) | 14.57 (0.6) | 0.474 |
| Age at menarche (years) | 11.75 (0.9) | 12.05 (2.5) | 0.043 |
| Family-size | 5.32 (1.8) | 5.28 (1.4) | 0.511 |
| Offspring rank in the family | 2.49 (1.7) | 2.75 (2) | 0.359 |
| Father's occupation | |||
| Non-literate and primary school | 4 (4.9) | 7 (8) | |
| Middle school, high school, and diploma | 55 (67.1) | 48 (54.5) | 0.99 |
| College | 23 (28) | 33 (37.5) | |
| Mather's education | |||
| Non-literate and primary school | 19 (23.2) | 13 (14.6) | |
| Middle school, high school, and diploma | 47 (57.3) | 66 (74.2) | 0.066 |
| College | 16 (19.5) | 10 (12.2) | |
| Father's occupation | |||
| Unemployed | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.1) | |
| Labourer | 1 (3.7) | 1 (1.1) | |
| Employee | 47 (57.3) | 52 (58.4) | |
| Self-employed | 31 (37.8) | 35 (39.3) | |
| Household income (RLS) | |||
| 1.000.000-2.000.000 | 11 (13.9) | 6 (7.2) | |
| 2.000.001-4.000.000 | 21 (26.6) | 28 (33.7) | |
| 4.000.001-6.000.000 | 22 (27.8) | 28 (33.7) | 0.328 |
| 6.000.001 and over | 25 (31.6) | 21 (25.3) |
*No significant difference was found between the two groups; age at menarche was significantly higher in the intervention than the control group;
**Independent sample t-test was used for analysis; results are expressed as mean (SD);
†Chi-square test was used for analysis; results are expressed as number (%)
The change in knowledge, attitude, and practice scores of students about dietary calcium intake in both the groups after educational intervention on KAP standardized questionnaire*
| KAP | Intervention group (n=95) | Control group (n=93) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | p value | Before intervention | After intervention | p value | |
| Knowledge | 43.7 (3.4) | 45.3 (3.5) | 0.001 | 43.7 (3.7) | 43 (4.3) | 0.136 |
| Attitude | 29.7 (3.9) | 32.6 (4.1) | 0.006 | 31 (4) | 31.6 (3.3) | 0.167 |
| Practice | 24.3 (5.2) | 25.5 (4.8) | 0.041 | 23.4 (4.1) | 24.3 (3.3) | 0.078 |
| Total | 97.6 (7.8) | 103.4 (8.2) | 0.001 | 98.1 (6.8) | 98.9 (6.8) | 0.386 |
*Results are expressed as mean (SD);
†Significantly different by paired t-test between baseline and after education
Comparison between intervention and control groups in knowledge, attitude and practice scores before and after the intervention
| KAP | Before intervention | After intervention | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention (n=95) | Control (n=93) | p value | Intervention (n=95) | Control (n=93) | p value | |
| Knowledge | 43.6 (3.9) | 43.7 (3.7) | 0.569 | 45.3 (4.3) | 43.4 (4.6) | 0.869 |
| Attitude | 29.7 (3.9) | 31 (4) | 0.761 | 32.6 (4.1) | 31.6 (3.4) | 0.049 |
| Practice | 24.3 (5.2) | 23.4 (4.1) | 0.171 | 25.5 (4.8) | 24.3 (3.3) | 0.005 |
| Total | 97.6 (7.8) | 98.1 (6.8) | 0.28 | 103.4 (8.2) | 98.7 (6.9) | 0.019 |
*Significantly different by independent t-test between the intervention and control groups after education
Comparison of Health Belief Model (HBM) domains scores between the intervention and control groups about dietary calcium intake on KAP standardized questionnaire*
| HBM construct | Before intervention | After intervention | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention (n=95) | Control (n=93) | p value | Intervention (n=95) | Control (n=93) | p value | |
| Perceived susceptibility | 23.4 (2.2) | 23.1 (2.9) | 0.167 | 44.8 (2) | 23 (2.1) | 0.006 |
| Perceived severity | 24.1 (2.1) | 24.8 (1.8) | 0.839 | 41.9 (2.1) | 25 (1.6) | 0.001 |
| Perceived benefits | 25.9 (2) | 25.5 (6.1) | 0.471 | 44.7 (2.1) | 26 (1.8) | 0.002 |
| Perceived barriers | 27.3 (2.1) | 27.8 (2.4) | 0.346 | 15.1 (2.1) | 27.4 (2.7) | 0.001 |
*Independent sample t-test was used for analysis. Data have been shown as mean (SD);
†Significantly different by independent t-test between the intervention and control groups after two months
Figure.Changes in daily consumption frequency of dairy food-group between the study groups in the pre-intervention period (before) and three months follow-up (after)
Changes in the students’ behavioural action, taking nutrition for daily dietary calcium intake in the pre-intervention period and three months follow-up*
| Food-group | Intervention (n=95) | Control (n=93) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Bread and cereals | 3.01 (1.3) | 3 (1.2) | 3.3 (1.6) | 2.7 (1.4) |
| Dairy | 2.8 (1.8) | 2.9 (1.8) | 2.5 (1.9) | 2.6 (1.8) |
| Fruits | 2.9 (1.2) | 2.5 (2.5) | 2.5 (1.9) | 2.2 (1.5) |
| Vegetables | 1.6 (1.6) | 1.6 (1.4) | 1.8 (1.2) | 1.4 (1.2) |
| Meat | 1.2 (1.6) | 2.2 (1.5) | 2.5 (2.6) | 2.5 (2.6) |
| Fats | 0.59 (0.68) | 0.52 (0.57) | 0.56 (0.98) | 0.53 (0.59) |
| Snacks | 1.7 (1.5) | 1.8 (1.6) | 1.8 (1.7) | 1.9 (2.2) |
*Paired sample t-tests was used for data analysis; Data have been shown as mean (SD);
**Difference was statistically significant (p=0.016);
†Difference was statistically significant (p=0.02)