Literature DB >> 25394317

Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease.

Shunsuke Fujibayashi1, Richard A Hynes, Bungo Otsuki, Hiroaki Kimura, Mitsuru Takemoto, Shuichi Matsuda.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective consecutive clinical study to assess the decompressive benefit and outcome of oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiologically the effect of interbody distraction upon neural patency via an anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional treatment for symptomatic lumbar stenosis uses direct posterior decompression with or without fusion. Symptoms of radiculopathy and neurological claudication may also be alleviated indirectly through restoration of intervertebral and foraminal heights and correction of spinal alignment.
METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients presenting with degenerative conditions that included concomitant lumbar stenosis underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at 52 lumbar levels without neuromonitoring. Magnetic resonance images were obtained successfully for 48 of 52 levels. The cross-sectional area of the thecal sac (CSA) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively on T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance images. Differences in CSA were compared, and the relationship between the ratio of CSA extension and that of the preoperative CSA was assessed. The change in disc height and segmental disc angle were measured. The relationships between CSA, disc height, segmental disc angle, and clinical results were assessed by correlational analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight oblique lateral interbody fusions were performed successfully without neural complications. There was clinical improvement in all cases. The mean CSA increased from 99.6 mm preoperatively to 134.3 mm postoperatively (P<0.001). The median CSA extension ratio was 30.2% and this correlated inversely with preoperative CSA. Disc height, segmental disc angle, and clinical results improved significantly. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the preoperative CSA was the only independent factor that correlated inversely with the CSA extension ratio (corrected R=0.361; P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Spinal stenosis was resolved successfully by indirect decompression through a miniopen anterolateral retroperitoneal approach without the need for neuromonitoring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25394317     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  72 in total

1.  Does the hip positioning matter for oblique lumbar interbody fusion approach? A morphometric study.

Authors:  Kaissar Farah; Henri-Arthur Leroy; Melodie-Anne Karnoub; Louis Obled; Stephane Fuentes; Richard Assaker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Endoscope-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of cauda equina syndrome: a technical note.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Ji-Hoon Seong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

Authors:  Zhong-You Zeng; Zhao-Wan Xu; Deng-Wei He; Xing Zhao; Wei-Hu Ma; Wen-Fei Ni; Yong-Xing Song; Jian-Qiao Zhang; Wei Yu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Nan-Jian Xu; Wen-Jian Huang; Zhi-Chao Hu; Ai-Lian Wu; Jian-Fei Ji; Jian-Fu Han; Shun-Wu Fan; Feng-Dong Zhao; Hui Jin; Fei Pei; Shi-Yang Fan; De-Xiu Sui
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Haocheng Xu; Bo Yin; Hongyue Tao; Shuo Yang; Chi Sun; Yitao Wang; Jun Yin; Minghao Shao; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Oblique retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1 in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Dae-Jean Jo; Sang-Hyun Lee; Eun-Min Seo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.

Authors:  David S Xu; Corey T Walker; Jakub Godzik; Jay D Turner; William Smith; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 7.  Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2-L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Javier Quillo-Olvera; Guang-Xun Lin; Hyun-Jin Jo; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

8.  Segmental coupling effects during correction of three-dimensional lumbar deformity using lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hiroto Yamaguchi; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Kei Miyagawa; Nozomu Inoue; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Preoperative evaluation of left common iliac vein in oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1.

Authors:  Nam-Su Chung; Chang-Hoon Jeon; Han-Dong Lee; Heon-Ju Kweon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Guiding role of imaging evaluation in oblique lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Chaoyang Wang; Jiancheng Zeng; Zhiqiang Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.