| Literature DB >> 25392790 |
Kenichi Katsurada1, Masaru Ichida1, Masako Sakuragi2, Megumi Takehara2, Yasuo Hozumi2, Kazuomi Kario1.
Abstract
The humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has been in routine use for chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor II (HER2)-positive breast cancer. A major adverse effect of trastuzumab is cardiotoxicity. Well-established biomarkers or echocardiographic parameters to predict trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity have not yet been determined. We attempted to identify useful biomarkers and/or echocardiographic parameters to predict trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity. We prospectively investigated the cases of 19 women who received chemotherapy including anthracyclines and trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer. We measured cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters before their chemotherapy and every 3 months up to 15 months until the end of the adjuvant trastuzumab therapy. We divided the patients into two groups: group R was the nine patients who showed a reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥5%, and group N was the 10 patients who showed a reduction of LVEF <5%. The high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) level at 6 months was significantly higher in group R than in group N (11.0 ± 7.8 pg/mL vs. 4.0 ± 1.4 pg/mL, p < 0.01). The hs-TnT level with a cutoff value of 5.5 pg/mL at 6 months had 78% sensitivity and 80% specificity for predicting a reduction of LVEF at 15 months. In our evaluation of echocardiographic parameters at baseline, the diastolic function was more impaired in group R than in group N. The hs-TnT and echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function could be useful to predict trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Anthracycline; Biomarker; Cardiac Troponin; Cardiotoxicity; Chemotherapy; Echocardiography; Heart failure; Trastuzumab
Year: 2014 PMID: 25392790 PMCID: PMC4216824 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Time course of the study protocol. Base: baseline; m: months.
Baseline characteristics of the 19 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who showed normal (N) or reduced (R) left ventricular ejection fraction
| Group N (n = 10) | Group R (n = 9) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 49 ± 7 | 57 ± 9 | 0.071 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22 ± 2 | 25 ± 3 | 0.037 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | |||
| Hypertension | 1 (10%) | 1 (11%) | 0.941 |
| Diabetes | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Hyperlipidemia | 2 (20%) | 2 (22%) | 0.912 |
| Smoking | 2 (20%) | 4 (44%) | 0.277 |
| Family history of CAD | 1 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 0.357 |
| Side of breast cancer | |||
| Right | 6 (60%) | 8 (89%) | 0.171 |
| Left | 4 (40%) | 1 (11%) | |
| Bilateral | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Radiation | 7 (70%) | 5 (56%) | 0.541 |
| Chemotherapy | |||
| Doxorubicin 240 mg/m2 | 1 (10%) | 4 (44%) | 0.098 |
| Epirubicin 300 mg/m2 | 9 (90%) | 5 (56%) | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.55 ± 0.10 | 0.50 ± 0.07 | 0.225 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 93.9 ± 19.0 | 100.5 ± 21.1 | 0.509 |
| Echocardiographic parameters | |||
| LVEF (%) | 68 ± 5 | 71 ± 3 | 0.103 |
| LVDd (mm) | 44 ± 3 | 44 ± 4 | 0.756 |
| E/A | 1.44 ± 0.41 | 1.00 ± 0.36 | 0.028 |
| DcT (ms) | 185 ± 26 | 227 ± 48 | 0.040 |
| e’ (cm/s) | 11.2 ± 3.2 | 7.6 ± 2.0 | 0.019 |
CAD: coronary artery disease, eGFR: estimated glormerular filtration rate, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, LVDd: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, E/A: mitral E-wave filling velocity/mitral A-wave filling velocity, DcT: deceleration time, e’: peak early diastolic velocity of septal mitral annulus.
Figure 2The changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) at 3 months (3 m), 6 months (6 m), 9 months (9 m), 12 months (12 m) and 15 months (15 m) versus baseline. Bars represent mean ± SD. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 comparing group N vs. group R at the same time point. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 within each group vs. baseline with a repeated ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
Biomarker levels in the HER2-positive breast cancer patients who showed normal (N) or reduced (R) left ventricular ejection fraction
| Biomarkers | Group N (n = 10) | Group R (n = 9) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| hs-TnT (pg/mL) | |||
| Baseline | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| 3 months | 7.0 ± 5.8** | 9.2 ± 6.6* | 0.524 |
| 6 months | 4.0 ± 1.4 | 11.0 ± 7.8** | 0.005 |
| 9 months | 4.4 ± 2.7 | 3.6 ± 1.7 | 0.457 |
| 12 months | 3.9 ± 1.6 | 4.9 ± 2.1 | 0.321 |
| 15 months | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 2.1 | 0.588 |
| hs-TnI (pg/mL) | |||
| Baseline | 4.2 ± 4.0 | 2.8 ± 2.9 | 0.426 |
| 3 months | 14.1 ± 7.0*** | 19.7 ± 17.3*** | 0.649 |
| 6 months | 10.6 ± 6.7** | 21.6 ± 16.4*** | 0.246 |
| 9 months | 7.3 ± 4.8 | 7.3 ± 6.1 | 0.621 |
| 12 months | 7.8 ± 5.9 | 8.7 ± 5.0 ** | 0.634 |
| 15 months | 10.3 ± 3.5** | 10.9 ± 6.4*** | 0.788 |
| hs-CRP (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.18 | 0.112 |
| 3 months | 0.35 ± 0.27* | 0.71 ± 0.64* | 0.283 |
| 6 months | 0.09 ± 0.09 | 0.11 ± 0.12 | 0.393 |
| 9 months | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.521 |
| 12 months | 0.18 ± 0.42 | 0.08 ± 0.11 | 0.867 |
| 15 months | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 0.85 ± 1.43 | 0.219 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | |||
| Baseline | 66.0 ± 30.5 | 46.6 ± 43.5 | 0.071 |
| 3 months | 56.4 ± 41.9 | 99.4 ± 76.9 | 0.337 |
| 6 months | 45.3 ± 32.8 | 22.9 ± 13.5 | 0.112 |
| 9 months | 39.5 ± 27.4 | 59.1 ± 27.2 | 0.093 |
| 12 months | 59.9 ± 51.4 | 52.1 ± 28.0 | 0.886 |
| 15 months | 61.1 ± 44.0 | 52.9 ± 26.4 | 0.795 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 vs. baseline within each group with a repeated ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
Figure 3The hs-TnT level at 6 months predicts a reduction of LVEF at 15 months. (A) The correlation between the changes of high-sensitivity troponin T (∆hs-TnT) at 6 months and the changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (∆LVEF) at 15 months. (B) The dot diagram depicting the distribution of hs-TnT at 6 months in each group. (C) The ROC curve analysis of hs-TnT at 6 months in both groups. The transverse dot line in (B) and the arrow in (C) indicate the cutoff point of hs-TnT that provides the maximum value by adding sensitivity to specificity.