Literature DB >> 25391994

Dissecting and engineering of the TetR family regulator SACE_7301 for enhanced erythromycin production in Saccharopolyspora erythraea.

Hang Wu1, Meng Chen2, Yongrong Mao3, Weiwei Li4, Jingtao Liu5,6, Xunduan Huang7, Ying Zhou8, Bang-Ce Ye9, Lixin Zhang10,11, David T Weaver12, Buchang Zhang13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Saccharopolyspora erythraea was extensively utilized for the industrial-scale production of erythromycin A (Er-A), a macrolide antibiotic commonly used in human medicine. Yet, S. erythraea lacks regulatory genes in the erythromycin biosynthetic gene (ery) cluster, hampering efforts to enhance Er-A production via the engineering of regulatory genes.
RESULTS: By the chromosome gene inactivation technique based on homologous recombination with linearized DNA fragments, we have inactivated a number of candidate TetR family transcriptional regulators (TFRs) and identified one TFR (SACE_7301) positively controlling erythromycin biosynthesis in S. erythraea A226. qRT-PCR and EMSA analyses demonstrated that SACE_7301 activated the transcription of erythromycin biosynthetic gene eryAI and the resistance gene ermE by interacting with their promoter regions with low affinities, similar to BldD (SACE_2077) previously identified to regulate erythromycin biosynthesis and morphological differentiation. Therefore, we designed a strategy for overexpressing SACE_7301 with 1 to 3 extra copies under the control of PermE* in A226. Following up-regulated transcriptional expression of SACE_7301, eryAI and ermE, the SACE_7301-overexpressed strains all increased Er-A production over A226 proportional to the number of copies. Likewise, when SACE_7301 was overexpressed in an industrial S. erythraea WB strain, Er-A yields of the mutants WB/7301, WB/2×7301 and WB/3×7301 were respectively increased by 17%, 29% and 42% relative to that of WB. In a 5 L fermentor, Er-A accumulation increased to 4,230 mg/L with the highest-yield strain WB/3×7301, an approximately 27% production improvement over WB (3,322 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: We have identified and characterized a TFR, SACE_7301, in S. erythraea that positively regulated erythromycin biosynthesis, and overexpression of SACE_7301 in wild-type and industrial S. erythraea strains enhanced Er-A yields. This study markedly improves our understanding of the unusual regulatory mechanism of erythromycin biosynthesis, and provides a novel strategy towards Er-A overproduction by engineering transcriptional regulators of S. erythraea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391994      PMCID: PMC4258057          DOI: 10.1186/s12934-014-0158-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Cell Fact        ISSN: 1475-2859            Impact factor:   5.328


Background

Saccharopolyspora erythraea, a Gram-positive industrial actinomycetes, produces a valuable macrolide antibiotic erythromycin A (Er-A). Er-A and its semi-synthetic derivatives, such as clarithromycin, azithromycin, dirithromycin, roxithromycin, and telithromycin, are widely used in medicine to treat infections caused by pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria [1]. Considering its high industrial and medical importance, enhancement of Er-A production has been performed by metabolic engineering or classical mutagenesis methods over the past 60 years [2-4]. Also, as a model actinomycete system, S. erythraea has been used for studying the biosynthesis and combinatorial biosynthesis of polyketide antibiotics, which are synthesized by modular type I polyketide synthase (PKS) [5,6]. The erythromycin biosynthetic pathway has been investigated by genetic and biochemical approaches [7,8]. The erythromycin biosynthetic gene (ery) cluster contains 20 genes arranged in four major polycistronic units, spanning over 60 kb of DNA [9]. Unusually, the ery cluster lacks any regulatory genes in S. erythraea, hampering efforts to improve Er-A production by modulating gene regulation pathways. Based on a DNA microarray strategy, the industrial overproducer strain was found to express the entire ery cluster several days longer than the wild-type strain, suggesting that there exist some regulators for controlling erythromycin biosynthesis [10]. In vitro and in vivo approaches led to the identification of BldD (SACE_2077), a key developmental regulator in actinomycetes [11], controlling erythromycin biosynthesis and morphological differentiation in S. erythraea [12]. BldD was found to bind to the promoter regions of ery cluster. However, the action of BldD on the promoters of ery genes was much weaker than on its own promoter [12]. Recently, a putative regulatory protein, SACE_5599, was proved to positively control erythromycin production and morphological differentiation in S. erythraea [13]. Nevertheless, the knowledge of molecular regulatory mechanisms controlling erythromycin biosynthesis remains limited. The TetR family transcriptional regulators (TFRs), containing an N-terminal HTH DNA-binding motif and a C-terminal ligand recognition domain, are widely distributed in bacteria, playing important roles in antibiotic biosynthesis, efflux pumps, osmotic stress, and other functions [14]. TFRs regulate the biosynthesis of multiple antibiotics or morphogenesis of actinomycetes [15-28], suggesting that certain TRFs from S. erythraea are candidates for a role in erythromycin biosynthesis. With the availability of the complete genome sequence, 101 putative TFRs in S. erythraea were inferred [29]. Based on the homologous recombination with linearized DNA fragments to inactivate specific genes, a number of the S. erythraea TFRs were examined, resulting in the identification of two TFRs (SACE_7040 and SACE_0012) having an association with morphological differentiation [30,31], and one TFR (SACE_3986) negatively controlling the erythromycin biosynthesis [32]. Nevertheless, functions of most TFRs in S. erythraea remain to be elucidated. In this study, we identified and characterized a novel TFR (SACE_7301) that positively regulated erythromycin biosynthesis. SACE_7301 was found to increase the transcription of erythromycin biosynthetic gene eryAI and the resistance gene ermE by binding to their promoter regions in S. erythraea. Further overexpression of SACE_7301 led to enhanced Er-A titers in the wild-type S. erythraea A226 and the high-yield industrial strain WB.

Results

SACE_7301 positively regulates the erythromycin biosynthesis

Since extensive investigations have proved that TFRs are involved in the antibiotic biosynthesis in actinomycetes through gene inactivation and bioassay experiments [33], we have identified several TFRs pertinent to erythromycin production in S. erythraea, including the repressor SACE_3986 [32], and the activator SACE_7301 currently studied. By homologous recombination of linearized fragments (Figure 1A), SACE_7301 was replaced by the thiostrepton resistance gene (tsr) in S. erythraea A226, and the desired mutant, named as ΔSACE_7301, was isolated and confirmed by PCR analysis (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Inactivation of in A226. (A) Schematic inactivation of SACE_7301 in A226 by linearized fragment homologous recombination. (B) Confirmation of the ΔSACE_7301 mutant by PCR analysis using the primers 7301-P1 and 7301-P4. Lanes: M, 5000-bp DNA ladder. The size of 3,660 bp for a PCR-amplified band was detected in A226, while the bands of the size 4,360 bp were observed in pUCTSR-Δ7301 and ΔSACE_7301, indicating that SACE_7301 was replaced with tsr. (C) Inhibition tests of A226, ΔSACE_7301 and ΔbldD fermentation broths against B. subtilis PUB110. (D) Time course of Er-A yield in A226 and ΔSACE_7301 by HPLC analysis; Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars. (E) Growth curves of A226 and ΔSACE_7301. The two strains were cultured in the R5 liquid fermentation medium, and their dry weights of mycelia (DWM) were measured. (F) Er-A production in A226, ΔSACE_7301, ΔSACE_7301/pZMW7301, A226/pZMW, and A226/pZMW7301 cultured in R5 liquid fermentation medium for 6 days by HPLC analysis. Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars.

Inactivation of in A226. (A) Schematic inactivation of SACE_7301 in A226 by linearized fragment homologous recombination. (B) Confirmation of the ΔSACE_7301 mutant by PCR analysis using the primers 7301-P1 and 7301-P4. Lanes: M, 5000-bp DNA ladder. The size of 3,660 bp for a PCR-amplified band was detected in A226, while the bands of the size 4,360 bp were observed in pUCTSR-Δ7301 and ΔSACE_7301, indicating that SACE_7301 was replaced with tsr. (C) Inhibition tests of A226, ΔSACE_7301 and ΔbldD fermentation broths against B. subtilis PUB110. (D) Time course of Er-A yield in A226 and ΔSACE_7301 by HPLC analysis; Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars. (E) Growth curves of A226 and ΔSACE_7301. The two strains were cultured in the R5 liquid fermentation medium, and their dry weights of mycelia (DWM) were measured. (F) Er-A production in A226, ΔSACE_7301, ΔSACE_7301/pZMW7301, A226/pZMW, and A226/pZMW7301 cultured in R5 liquid fermentation medium for 6 days by HPLC analysis. Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars. Erythromycin titers of A226 and ΔSACE_7301 were estimated by fermentation and bioassay. ΔSACE_7301 displayed lower inhibitory activity against Bacillus subtilis relative to A226, but had slightly higher levels than the bldD deletion mutant (Figure 1C), a previously identified regulator of erythromycin biosynthesis [12]. Furthermore, A226 and ΔSACE_7301 were cultivated at 30°C for up to 6 days in the R5 liquid fermentation medium, and the extracts of those cultures were analyzed by HPLC. Compared with the parental strain A226, ΔSACE_7301 had a 38% reduction in the Er-A yield in 6 day fermentation period (from 58 mg/L to 36 mg/L). (Figure 1D). However, the two strains had comparable growth rates and cell densities (Figure 1E). Thus, SACE_7301 is postulated to positively regulate erythromycin production in S. erythraea. In order to exclude the possibility that the decreased erythromycin production was due to a random mutation in other chromosome loci of S. erythraea, ΔSACE_7301 was complemented with a copy of SACE_7301 (pZMW7301). The Er-A yield of the complemented strain ΔSACE_7301/pZMW7301 was nearly recovered to the parental level (Figure 1F). To further substantiate the role of SACE_7301 as an activator for erythromycin production, we introduced pZMW and pZMW7301 into A226, obtaining the control strain A226/pZMW and the SACE_7301-overexpressed strain A226/pZMW7301, respectively. As detected by HPLC analysis, the Er-A yield of A226/pZMW-7301 was 64 mg/L, that was 10% and 14% increased relative to those of A226 (58 mg/L) and A226/pZMW (56 mg/L) respectively (Figure 1F). Taken together, our results verified that SACE_7301 acted as a positive regulator controlling the erythromycin production in S. erythraea.

SACE_7301 is not involved in the morphological differentiation of S. erythraea

Previously, BldD and SACE_5599 were identified to concurrently regulate erythromycin biosynthesis and morphological differentiation in S. erythraea [12,13]. In order to discern whether SACE_7301 was also associated with the morphological differentiation, we inoculated A226 and its derivative mutants on R3M agar medium for observing sporulation. ΔSACE_7301, ΔSACE_7301/pZMW7301 and A226/pZMW7301 on R3M plates were identical to A226 in the rate of aerial mycelia formation, whereas ΔbldD showed the defect of aerial hyphae as expected (data not shown). These results further substantiate that SACE_7301 acts exclusively as a positive regulator for the synthesis of erythromycin in S. erythraea.

Overexpression of SACE_7301 increases the transcription of eryAI and ermE

To investigate the effect of SACE_7301 overexpression on the transcription of ery genes, we chose erythromycin biosynthetic gene eryAI (encoding polyketide synthase I) and the resistance gene ermE (encoding rRNA methyltransferase) for transcriptional comparison between control strain A226/pZMW and overexpressed strain A226/pZMW7301 on the second or fourth day of growth. When grown for 4 days, A226/pZMW7301 exhibited 2.2- and 1.7- folds transcription increases detected by qRT-PCR for eryAI and ermE in comparison to A226/pZMW (Figure 2B). Similar transcriptional levels of eryAI and ermE were found for the two strains in 2-day growth (Figure 2A). The data supports the interpretation that SACE_7301 plays a positive role in the erythromycin biosynthesis by increasing the transcription of several structural and resistance genes.
Figure 2

Effects of overexpression on transcriptional levels of and . qRT-PCR was used to quantify the amounts of transcripts produced by A226/pZMW, and A226/pZMW7301 cultured in R5 fermentation medium for 2 (A) or 4 days (B). Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars.

Effects of overexpression on transcriptional levels of and . qRT-PCR was used to quantify the amounts of transcripts produced by A226/pZMW, and A226/pZMW7301 cultured in R5 fermentation medium for 2 (A) or 4 days (B). Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars.

SACE_7301 binds to the promoter regions of eryAI and ermE

TetR family members often regulate the transcription of target genes by specifically binding to their promoters [33]. To examine whether SACE_7301 might directly regulate the transcription of eryAI and ermE, a full-length SACE_7301 gene was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using pET22b, and the purified SACE_7301 protein fused with His tag (Additional file 1: Figure S1) was used for in vitro binding experiments by EMSA. 6-FAM labeled eryAI and ermE promoter DNA fragments were respectively mixed with purified His6-tagged SACE_7301. At concentrations equal or greater than 1 μM of SACE_7301, mobility shifts were evident. Meantime, it was found that a 50-fold excess of unlabeled probes markedly competed with labeled probes for binding to SACE_7301 (Figure 3A-B). As a negative control, a non-specific DNA, poly dIdC, was used to compete with the 6-FAM labeled probes, and the shifted bands did not disappear (Figure 3A-B), confirming that SACE _7301 specifically bound to the promoter regions of eryAI and ermE.
Figure 3

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with the promoter regions of or and purified His -tagged SACE_7301 or His -tagged BldD. (A) EMSAs with recombinant SACE_7301 protein and PeryAI. (B) EMSAs with recombinant SACE_7301 protein and PermE. (C) EMSAs with recombinant BldD protein and PeryAI. (D) EMSAs with recombinant BldD protein and PermE. Each of the lanes contained 10 ng DNA. Results were one representative example of at least three replicates.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with the promoter regions of or and purified His -tagged SACE_7301 or His -tagged BldD. (A) EMSAs with recombinant SACE_7301 protein and PeryAI. (B) EMSAs with recombinant SACE_7301 protein and PermE. (C) EMSAs with recombinant BldD protein and PeryAI. (D) EMSAs with recombinant BldD protein and PermE. Each of the lanes contained 10 ng DNA. Results were one representative example of at least three replicates. To evaluate the relative affinity of SACE_7301 to above-mentioned probes, we expressed recombinant BldD protein in E. coli BL21 (DE3), and purified it with His6-tag (Additional file 1: Figure S1). EMSAs showed that the concentrations of BldD shifting the two promoter probes of eryAI and ermE were similar to that of SACE_7301 (Figure 3C-D), indicating that SACE_7301 and BldD had the same degree of affinities to the two promoters. Therefore, the combined data indicates that SACE_7301 up-regulates the transcription of eryAI and ermE by directly interacting with their promoter regions.

Effects of SACE_7301 overexpression on erythromycin biosynthesis in S. erythraea A226

As overexpression of SACE_7301 with an extra copy displayed an increase of Er-A production in S. erythraea A226 as described above, we proposed that increased copy numbers of SACE_7301 would lead to additional increases in Er-A levels. SACE_7301 under the control of PermE* was cloned into pSET152, creating 1, 2, or 3 copies of SACE_7301, introduced into A226 (Figure 4A), to generate A226/7301, A226/2×7301 and A226/3×7301 strains respectively. By fermentation and HPLC analysis, the three strains all presented Er-A product improvement (Figure 4B). Furthermore, the Er-A production exhibited a positive correlation with the copy number of SACE_7301, reaching the highest 1.44 folds with 3 copies (Figure 4B). When cultured in the R5 liquid medium, these strains had comparable growth rates and cell densities (Additional file 1: Figure S2), suggesting that the enhanced erythromycin yield in SACE_7301-overexpressed strains was not caused by the increase of biomass.
Figure 4

Effects of overexpression of on erythromycin biosynthesis in A226. (A) Schematic illustration of the strategy for construction of expression plasmids with 1 to 3 copies of SACE_7301. (B) Er-A production of A226 and SACE_7301-overexpressed mutants. (C) qRT-PCR analyses of gene transcription in A226 and SACE_7301-overexpressed mutants. Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars.

Effects of overexpression of on erythromycin biosynthesis in A226. (A) Schematic illustration of the strategy for construction of expression plasmids with 1 to 3 copies of SACE_7301. (B) Er-A production of A226 and SACE_7301-overexpressed mutants. (C) qRT-PCR analyses of gene transcription in A226 and SACE_7301-overexpressed mutants. Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars. In addition, qRT-PCR was used to compare the transcriptional levels of SACE_7301, eryAI and ermE between A226 and its SACE_7301-overexpressed strains. With the increase of SACE_7301 copy number, the transcripts of SACE_7301 in A226/7301, A226/2×7301 and A226/3×7301 were found to be up-regulated by 4.6-, 8.4- and 16.5-folds relative to that of A226 (Figure 4C). Likewise, the transcripts of eryAI and ermE in those mutants were gradually increased compared to the original level (Figure 4C). These results indicated that overexpression of SACE_7301 with 1 to 3 extra copies in S. erythraea associated with a stepwise increase of Er-A production by promoting the transcription of eryAI and ermE. In conjunction with RNA changes, A226/3×7301 also demonstrated increased resistance to erythromycin over A226 when cultured for 2 days with addition of greater than 160 μg/ml erythromycin (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Also, we cultured A226/3×7301 in the R5 liquid medium for 6 days without addition of apramycin, and found that the size of the gene expression cassette containing the 3 copies of SACE_7301 from plasmid pSET152-3×7301 did not change by PCR analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S4), indicating that the engineered strain had a stably inserted SACE_7301.

Improved Er-A production by overexpression of SACE_7301 in an industrial strain WB

To examine the applicability of overexpression of SACE_7301 for enhancing erythromycin production in industrially-relevant strains, SACE_7301 was introduced into an industrial S. erythraea WB strain with 1, 2 or 3 extra copies under the control of PermE*, and the desired mutants WB/7301, WB/2×7301 and WB/3×7301 were obtained. In flask experiments with an industrial medium for 6 days, the Er-A yields of WB/7301 (685 mg/L), WB/2×7301 (755 mg/L) and WB/3×7301 (832 mg/L) were respectively increased by 17%, 29%, and 42% in comparison to that of WB (586 mg/L) (Figure 5A). Likewise, no significant change of cell growth was detected for these strains in comparison (Additional file 1: Figure S2).
Figure 5

Overexpression of in the industrial strain WB resulted in a higher Er-A production. (A) Er-A yield of WB and its derivatives cultured in flasks for 6 days. Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars. (B) Time course of Er-A production of WB and WB/3×7301 in a 5 L fermentor. One of the representative datasets was shown.

Overexpression of in the industrial strain WB resulted in a higher Er-A production. (A) Er-A yield of WB and its derivatives cultured in flasks for 6 days. Mean values of at least three replicates were shown, with the standard deviation indicated by error bars. (B) Time course of Er-A production of WB and WB/3×7301 in a 5 L fermentor. One of the representative datasets was shown. We also tested the reproducibility of one of the engineered strains in a larger scale by selecting the highest-yield strain WB/3×7301. Following 8-day fermentation at a 5 L fermentor scale, WB/3×7301 exhibited a strikingly higher Er-A yield (4,230 mg/L), that was 27% greater than WB (3,322 mg/L). Since this strain maintains the characteristics of its parental strain, we conclude that the additional Er-A production from SACE_7301-engineered industrial strains will be of significant commercial value.

Discussion

TFRs form homodimers that generally act as transcriptional repressors to regulate the transcription of genes involved in antibiotic biosynthesis or resistance [34], but little is known about the TFR as a positive regulator for controlling the antibiotic biosynthesis in actinomycetes. Recently, the TetR family regulatory gene gouR, situated in the gene cluster of gougerotin biosynthesis, was characterized to be a positive regulator for modulating the gougerotin production by coordinating its biosynthesis and export in Streptomyces graminearus [27]. In this work, we identified a novel TFR (SACE_7301) from S. erythraea, and proved that it played a positive role in regulating erythromycin biosynthesis. SACE_7301 was shown to specifically bind to the promoter regions of eryAI and ermE in vitro, and enhance their transcription. SACE_7301, located approximately 8.1 Mb in the chromosome of S. erythraea, is not closely positioned with the ery cluster (GenBank Accession No. NC-009142. 778,214–832,825 nt, 0.8 Mb) and therefore it became evident that the gene product of SACE_7301 might function as a trans-acting factor remotely regulating erythromycin biosynthesis. This regulation pattern may be similar to that of BldD, a previously identified regulator for erythromycin biosynthesis [12]. As SACE_7301 exhibited low affinities to eryA and ermE promoters, it was difficult to determine the tight binding sites through DNase I footprinting assay. On the other hand, moderate increase in Er-A production was achieved by overexpression of SACE_7301 with an extra copy, similar to BldD in S. erythraea A226 [35]. These data indicate that SACE_7301 is likely a positive regulator that directly acts on the promoters of ery genes. Through phylogenetic analysis [34], SACE_7301 homologs are distributed in rare actinomycetes, such as KUTG_05296 from Kutzneria sp. 744 (62% identity), Amir_6979 from Actinosynnema mirum ATCC29888 (63% identity), BN6_83740 from Saccharothrix espanaensis ATCC51144 (60% identity) (Additional file 1: Figure S5). However, since none of these TFRs has been uncovered in actinomycetes, it potentially signifies a novel regulatory mechanism in actinomycetes, such as how it functions with its ligand [36]. To further improve the production of erythromycin, an overexpression tactic was designed and utilized for overexpressing SACE_7301 under PermE* in wild-type strain A226 and industrial overproducer WB. Along with the increase of SACE_7301 copy number, SACE_7301, eryAI and ermE were significantly up-regulated, and Er-A yields of those mutants rose step by step. However, these changes in transcription level do not linearly correspond to the changes in Er-A production. A similar result was also reported for the TetR family regulator GouR in S. graminearus [27]. Overexpression of bldD or SACE_5599 could improve erythromycin production in the wild-type S. erythraea strain, but not in the industrial overproducer [13]. Considering that WB is already an industrial strain, it is likely that overexpression of SACE_7301 will have commercial value when applied in other erythromycin high-yield S. erythraea strains. In other examples, the overexpression approach was utilized to engineer the halogenase gene ctcP, resulting in improvement of chlortetracycline production in industrial S. aureofaciens [37]. Overexpression of tailor genes eryK and eryG was also performed to enhance the production and purity of Er-A in an industrial S. erythraea [4]. To our knowledge, this is the first report for tandemly expressing transcriptional regulators to enhance antibiotic production in actinomycetes. We anticipate that the strategy of overexpression of additional regulators will be generally applicable for improvement of other antibiotics in industry.

Conclusion

The novel TFR SACE_7301 positively regulates erythromycin biosynthesis in S. erythraea, and it activated the transcription of erythromycin biosynthetic gene eryAI and the resistance gene ermE by interacting with their promoters. Furthermore, when SACE_7301 was overexpressed in wild-type or industrial S. erythraea strains with 1 to 3 extra copies, Er-A yields had stepwise enhancement in comparison to the parental strains. Our data here form a new understanding of the unusual regulatory mechanism of erythromycin biosynthesis, and provide a valuable means to improve erythromycin production.

Materials and methods

Strains, plasmids, and culture conditions

All strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. erythraea and its derivatives were grown either in TSB liquid medium for seed culture, DNA extraction and protoplast preparation, or on R3M agar medium for protoplast regeneration or phenotypic observation with thiostrepton or apramycin when appropriate [38,39]. E. coli and B. subtilis strains were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid medium or on LB plates at 37°C [40]. The general techniques in E. coli and S. erythraea were performed as described [38,40].
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Strains or plasmids Description Sources
S. erythraea
A226CGMCC 8279, an erythromycin low producerChina Pharmaceutical Culture Collection
ΔSACE_7301 A226 with SACE_7301 deletedThis study
ΔSACE_7301/pZMWΔSACE_7301 carrying pZMWThis study
ΔSACE_7301/pZMW7301ΔSACE_7301 carrying pZMW7301This study
A226/pZMWA226 carrying pZMWThis study
A226/pZMW7301A226 carrying pZMW7301This study
A226/7301A226 carrying pSET152-7301This study
A226/2×7301A226 carrying pSET152-2×7301This study
A226/3×7301A226 carrying pSET152-3×7301This study
WBCGMCC 8280, an erythromycin industrial overproducerAnhui Wanbei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
WB/7301WB carrying pSET152-7301This study
WB/2×7301WB carrying pSET152-2×7301This study
WB/3×7301WB carrying pSET152-3×7301This study
E. coli
DH5αF recA lacZM15[40]
BL21(DE3)F-ompT hsdSB (rB-mB-) gal dcm (DE3)Novagen
Plasmids
pUCTSRpUC18 derivative containing a 1.36-kb fragment of a thiostrepton resistance cassette in the BamHI/SmaI sites[41]
pUCTSR-Δ7301pUCTSR carrying two 1.5-kb fragments of the flanking sequence of SACE_7301 geneThis study
pZMW E. coli-S. erythraea integrative shuttle vector carrying PermE* [42]
pZMW7301pZMW carrying SACE_7301 This study
pBluescript II SK (+) bla, lacZ orif1 Stratagene
pSK-7301pBluescript II SK (+) carrying SACE_7301 under the control of PermE* This study
pSET152 E. coli-S. erythraea integrative shuttle vector[43]
pSET152-7301pSET152 carrying SACE_7301 under the control of PermE* This study
pSET152-2×7301pSET152 carrying two extra copies of SACE_7301 under the control of PermE* This study
pSET152-3×7301pSET152 carrying three extra copies of SACE_7301 under the control of PermE* This study
pET22bT7 promoter, His-tag, kan Novagen
pET22b-7301pET22b carrying SACE_7301 This study
pET22b-bldDpET22b carrying bldD This study
Strains and plasmids used in this study

Gene inactivation, complementation and overexpression of SACE_7301

With S. erythraea A226 genomic DNA as a template, two 1.5-kb DNA fragments flanking the SACE_7301 gene were amplified by PCR using the primer pairs 7301-P1/7301-P2 and 7301-P3/7301-P4 (Table 2). The two PCR products were respectively digested with EcoRI/KpnI and XbaI/HindIII, and ligated into the corresponding sites of pUCTSR [30], obtaining pUCTSR-Δ7301. By the homologous recombination with linearized fragments [41], the SACE_7301 gene of S. erythraea A226 was replaced with the thiostrepton resistance gene (tsr). The desired thiostrepton-resistant mutant, named ΔSACE_7301, was further confirmed by PCR analysis using the primers 7301-P1/7301-P4 (Table 2).
Table 2

Primers used in this study

Name Sequence (5′-3) (restriction site with italic formatting) Use
7301-P1CGCGAATTCGCATCCTCG AGCACTTCACCG (EcoRI)Inactivation of SACE_7301
7301-P2CCCGGTACCCGGCTCCGGATGGAACCG (KpnI)
7301-P3CTCTCTAGACACCACGGCGGCCTGCCG GC (XbaI)
7301-P4CCAAAGCTTGGAGTCGGCGCATGCTGGTCTC (HindIII)
7301-P5AGACATATGATGAAGGCCGACGTGGAGCAC (NdeI)Complementation and overexpression of SACE_7301
7301-P6GCAGATATCTCACTCCGGTTT CCAGTCGCG (EcoRV)
apr-FGCTCATCGGTCAGCTTCTCA
apr-RTCGCATTCTTCGCATCCC
7301-P7GCTGGGTGTACTCGAAGAACGAqRT-PCR analysis of SACE_7301
7301-P8TGGGGTCGAAGGAGGAGC
7301-P9AGACATATGATGAAAGCCGATGTGGAGCATTCTGATCGTCCGCGTCCGCGTACCAAGCGGCTGCCGCGC (NdeI)Expression of SACE_7301 In E. coli
7301-P10CCCAAGCTTCTCCGGTTTCCAGTCGCGGCC (HindIII)
bldD-FAAACATATGATGGGCGACTACGCCAAGGCGCTGGG (NdeI)Expression of BldD In E. coli
bldD-RTGTAAGCTTCTCCTCCCGGGCCGGGCGC (HindIII)
ermE-FTAATCTAGAGCGAGTGTCCGTTCGAGTGG (XbaI)Cloning of combined DNA fragment containing PermE* and SACE_7301
7301-RGCAACTAGTTCACTCCGGTTTCCAGTCGCG (SpeI)
eryAI-P1CCGCTGATGCCGAACGACqRT-PCR analysis of eryAI
eryAI-P2CACCCTTCCCCGCACTCTG
eryAI-P3CGGAGCATTTGCTCGCTTTCCAGGEMSA of eryAI promoter
eryAI-P4GCGTCCCCCTACTCGACGACCAC
ermE-P1CCTCCAGGCACCAGTCCACqRT-PCR analysis of ermE
ermE-P2AGTCGTTGCGGGAGAAGCT
ermE-P3GCGAGTGTCCGTTCGAGTGGCGGEMSA of ermE promoter
ermE-P4CGCTGGATCCTACCAACCGGCAC
hrdB-FGGTCACGCCGTAGACCTGGCqRT-PCR analysis of hrdB as internal reference
hrdB-RCGGTGTCGTTCACGCTGCTG
Test-FGCCAGTGCCAAGCTTGGGCTGCAGGTCGACPCR analysis of the cassette containing 3 copies of PermE*-SACE_7301
Test-RGAATTCGATATCGCGCGCGGCCGCGGATCC
Using the primers 7301-P5 and 7301-P6 (Table 2), a 0.66-kb DNA fragment containing a full-length SACE_7301 was amplified by PCR with the genomic DNA of A226 as a template. The PCR product was cleaved with NdeI/EcoRV, and inserted into the corresponding sites of integrative plasmid pZMW [42], yielding pZMW-7301. By PEG-mediated protoplast transformation, pZMW7301 was introduced into the ΔSACE_7301 mutant and the parental strain A226, respectively. The complemented strain ΔSACE_7301/pZMW7301 and overexpression strain A226/pZMW7301 were obtained by apramycin resistance screening and confirmed by PCR analysis with the primers apr-F and apr-R (Table 2).

Overexpression of SACE_7301 in S. erythraea

In order to introduce 1 to 3 extra copies of SACE_7301 into the chromosome of S. erythraea, the combined DNA fragment containing PermE* and SACE_7301 from the plasmid pZMW7301 was amplified using the primer pair ermE-F and 7301-R (Table 2). The amplified product was cloned into pBluescript II SK (+) via XbaI and SpeI sites (Figure 4A), and the correct sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The fragment digested with XbaI and SpeI was repeatedly subcloned into XbaI site of pSET152 to generate pSET152-7301, pSET152-2×7301 and pSET152-3×7301, respectively (Figure 4A). Those plasmids were successively introduced into S. erythraea A226 or WB, and corresponding SACE_7301-overexpressed strains were obtained by apramycin screening and PCR confirmation.

Fermentation and erythromycin assay

For flask fermentation of A226 and its derivatives, spores from R3M plates cultured for 4 days were incubated in 250 ml baffled flasks containing 30 ml TSB medium for 2 days at 30°C. Then, 3 ml cultures were inoculated into 250 ml baffled flasks containing 30 ml R5 liquid fermentation medium [38], and shaken for 6 days at 30°C (220 rpm). For flask fermentation of the erythromycin high-yielding strain WB and its derivatives, a liquid industrial medium was used as previously described [32]. After 24 h fermentation, 0.3 ml of n-propanol was added into the cultures and further incubated for 5 days at 30°C (220 rpm). For bioreactor cultures of WB and its SACE_7301-overexpressed strain WB/3×7301, the fermentation experiments were carried out in a 5 L fermentor (Baoxing, Shanghai, China) containing 3 L liquid industrial medium. Seed cultures for the cultivation in bioreactors were prepared as described above, using 450 ml industrial seed medium in 2 L baffled flasks. Bioreactors were inoculated with 30 vol.% seed culture. Dissolved oxygen concentration and pH were monitored using autoclavable electrodes (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland). Dissolved oxygen was maintained about 50% with increasing agitation and aeration rate during the bioprocess, and the pH was kept at 7.0 to 7.2. Foaming was controlled by automatic addition of antifoam. Samples (50 ml) were taken every 24 h for Er-A yield analysis with HPLC as described previously [44]. HPLC analysis was performed on Agilent 1260 HPLC system equipped with an Agilent Extend-C18 column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm), which was equilibrated with 40% solution A (acetonitrile, chromatographic grade) and 60% solution B (potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 0.032 mol/L, pH 6.8). An isocratic program was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min at 29°C using UV detector at 210 nm. For bioassay-based analysis, A226, ΔSACE_7301 and ΔbldD were grown in 30 ml R5 liquid medium in 250 ml flasks for 6 days at 30°C. 5 μl fermentation supernatants from those liquid cultures were added to LB agar plates, which were sprayed with an overnight culture of B. subtilis PUB110. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 12 h, and the erythromycin production was estimated by detecting the growth-inhibition zones as previously demonstrated [31]. Moreover, Er-A produced by A226, WB and their derivatives were quantitatively analyzed by HPLC.

Transcriptional analysis by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The relative transcriptional levels of eryAI and ermE, from erythromycin biosynthetic gene cluster [7], were determined by qRT-PCR analysis. Specific primers were designed as listed in Table 2. According to the manufacturer’s instructions of a RNA extraction/purification kit (SBS), total RNA was extracted from S. erythraea A226 and its derivatives after 2 or 4 days of growth on R5 agar medium [38]. Isolated RNA was treated with DNase I (MBI Fermentas), and reverse transcription was achieved using a cDNA synthesis kit (MBI Fermentas). Quantitative real time PCR reactions were performed on the Applied Biosystems Step-One Plus system with Maxima™ SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (MBI Fermentas). The hrdB gene encoding the major sigma factor in S. erythraea was used as an internal control, and relative quantification was evaluated using a comparative cycle threshold (CT) method [45]. Primers used in this study

Overexpression and purification of SACE_7301 and BldD

As the original SACE_7301 gene could not be expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) initially, we optimized the N-terminal codons during the amplification of SACE_7301 using the primers 7301-P9 and 7301-P10 (Table 2). The PCR product was cloned into NdeI and HindIII restriction sites of pET22b to generate pET22b-7301. Then, pET22b-7301 was introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) for protein production. Gene expression was induced with 1 mM isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG) for 5 h at 30°C. Cells were harvested and followed by sonication treatment. Purification of His6-tagged protein was carried out by use of Ni-NTA Sepharose chromatography [46]. The concentration of purified protein was quantified by BCA assays, and its purity was judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis. Similarly, bldD was amplified with the primers bldD-F and bldD-R (Table 2), and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)

EMSAs were carried out in the light of previously described methods [47]. Using the genomic DNA from S. erythraea A226 as a template, the promoter regions of eryAI and ermE were successively amplified by PCR with their respective primers (Table 2) labeled at 5′ end by the 6-isomer of carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM). Those labeled DNA fragments were independently mixed with purified His6-tagged SACE_7301 or BldD proteins. The binding reaction system consisted of 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM EDTA, 60 mM KCl, 10 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 150 ng labeled probes and 0.5-4 μM purified SACE_7301 or BldD. For competitive inhibition of the binding reaction, 7.5 μg unlabeled above-mentioned DNA fragments or 7.5 μg poly dIdC were added into that reaction system, respectively. After incubation on ice for 10 min, the reactants were run on an 8% TBE polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) with 0.5 × TBE as a running buffer at 30 mA for 1 h.
  42 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Metal chelate affinity chromatography, a new approach to protein fractionation.

Authors:  J Porath; J Carlsson; I Olsson; G Belfrage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The TetR family of transcriptional repressors.

Authors:  Juan L Ramos; Manuel Martínez-Bueno; Antonio J Molina-Henares; Wilson Terán; Kazuya Watanabe; Xiaodong Zhang; María Trinidad Gallegos; Richard Brennan; Raquel Tobes
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Identification of SACE_7040, a member of TetR family related to the morphological differentiation of Saccharopolyspora erythraea.

Authors:  Shu Han; Ping Song; Ting Ren; Xunduan Huang; Cheng Cao; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  In search of the missing ligands for TetR family regulators.

Authors:  Christophe Corre
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2013-02-21

6.  Functional analysis of TetR-family regulator AmtRsav in Streptomyces avermitilis.

Authors:  Yunliang Chen; Hong Zhu; Guosong Zheng; Weihong Jiang; Yinhua Lu
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Genetic modulation of the overexpression of tailoring genes eryK and eryG leading to the improvement of erythromycin A purity and production in Saccharopolyspora erythraea fermentation.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Wei Deng; Jiequn Wu; Jiangchao Qian; Ju Chu; Yingping Zhuang; Siliang Zhang; Wen Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Functional expression of SAV3818, a putative TetR-family transcriptional regulatory gene from Streptomyces avermitilis, stimulates antibiotic production in Streptomyces species.

Authors:  Cac Thi Phung Duong; Han-Na Lee; Si-Sun Choi; Sang Yup Lee; Eung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.351

9.  A novel TetR family transcriptional regulator, SAV576, negatively controls avermectin biosynthesis in Streptomyces avermitilis.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Xuan Zhang; Shuai Luo; Fei He; Zhi Chen; Ying Wen; Jilun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two adjacent and similar TetR family transcriptional regulator genes, SAV577 and SAV576, co-regulate avermectin production in Streptomyces avermitilis.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Xuan Zhang; Zhi Chen; Ying Wen; Jilun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Enhanced lincomycin production by co-overexpression of metK1 and metK2 in Streptomyces lincolnensis.

Authors:  Yurong Xu; Guoqing Tan; Meilan Ke; Jie Li; Yaqian Tang; Sitong Meng; Jingjing Niu; Yansheng Wang; Ruihua Liu; Hang Wu; Linquan Bai; Lixin Zhang; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Joint engineering of SACE_Lrp and its target MarR enhances the biosynthesis and export of erythromycin in Saccharopolyspora erythraea.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Long Li; Yunxia Wang; Bowen Li; Xinlu Cai; Lijuan Tang; Shengnan Dong; Endong Yang; Hang Wu; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Crosstalk of TetR-like regulator SACE_4839 and a nitrogen regulator for erythromycin biosynthesis.

Authors:  Sabir Khan; Xueqi Xu; Jialei Song; Panpan Wu; Xiaobin Liu; Jing Liu; Ketao Chen; Zhenyue Xu; Hang Wu; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.560

4.  TetR-Type Regulator SLCG_2919 Is a Negative Regulator of Lincomycin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces lincolnensis.

Authors:  Yurong Xu; Meilan Ke; Jie Li; Yaqian Tang; Nian Wang; Guoqing Tan; Yansheng Wang; Ruihua Liu; Linquan Bai; Lixin Zhang; Hang Wu; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  TetR Family Transcriptional Regulator PccD Negatively Controls Propionyl Coenzyme A Assimilation in Saccharopolyspora erythraea.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Miaomiao Wang; Bang-Ce Ye
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Streptomyces: host for refactoring of diverse bioactive secondary metabolites.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Randhir Kaur; Richa Salwan
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.893

7.  Inactivation of SACE_3446, a TetR family transcriptional regulator, stimulates erythromycin production in Saccharopolyspora erythraea.

Authors:  Hang Wu; Yansheng Wang; Li Yuan; Yongrong Mao; Weiwei Wang; Lin Zhu; Panpan Wu; Chengzhang Fu; Rolf Müller; David T Weaver; Lixin Zhang; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-16

8.  Transcriptome-guided target identification of the TetR-like regulator SACE_5754 and engineered overproduction of erythromycin in Saccharopolyspora erythraea.

Authors:  Hang Wu; Zuling Chu; Wanxiang Zhang; Chi Zhang; Jingshu Ni; Heshi Fang; Yuhong Chen; Yansheng Wang; Lixin Zhang; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Polyketide Starter and Extender Units Serve as Regulatory Ligands to Coordinate the Biosynthesis of Antibiotics in Actinomycetes.

Authors:  Panpan Wu; Ketao Chen; Bowen Li; Yanni Zhang; Hang Wu; Yuhong Chen; Shaohua Ren; Sabir Khan; Lixin Zhang; Buchang Zhang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 7.867

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.